Search for Truth from Reasoning: A Dynamic Representation Editing Framework for Steering LLM Trajectories
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28589v2
- Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 05:26:35 GMT
- Title: Search for Truth from Reasoning: A Dynamic Representation Editing Framework for Steering LLM Trajectories
- Abstract summary: We investigate the geometry of truth within unfolding reasoning chains.<n>We propose DynaSteer, a dynamic Representation Editing framework.<n>Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/tianlwang/DynaSteer.
- Score: 41.42484801242256
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Current approaches to enhance Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning, such as Chain-of-Thought and "Wait" prompts, primarily encourage models to think more, yet often fail to guide them toward Truth. While Representation Editing (RepE) offers a intrinsic control, its application to dynamic reasoning trajectories remains underexplored. In this work, we bridge this gap by investigating the geometry of truth within unfolding reasoning chains. We uncover three critical insights: (1) Truth is encoded at the sentence level and is entangled with latent reasoning patterns; (2) Effective intervention follows an Uncertainty Principle and a Decay Effect, requiring localization to early, high-entropy forks; (3) Naive steering vectors suffer from noise, risking collateral damage to correct trajectories. Based on these findings, we propose DynaSteer, a dynamic RepE framework. DynaSteer employs pattern clustering to disentangle reasoning manifolds and utilizes Fisher-LDA to project purified truth. By dynamically monitoring lookahead entropy, it selectively steers and rolls back trajectories only when necessary. Comprehensive experimental results on several MATH benchmark verify the effectiveness of DynaSteer, and experiments on out-of-domain coding tasks further confirm its generalization ability. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/tianlwang/DynaSteer.
Related papers
- The Tell-Tale Norm: $\ell_2$ Magnitude as a Signal for Reasoning Dynamics in Large Language Models [18.187988335064716]
We demonstrate that the l2 norm of hidden states serves as an endogenous signal of the model's reasoning intensity.<n>Motivated by this pattern, we establish a formal link between reasoning intensity and the model's latent geometry.<n> Experiments across model architectures and benchmarks show that l2-norm-based techniques significantly improve reasoning performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T13:59:07Z) - AnE: Pushing the Reasoning Frontier of Multimodal LLMs via Anchor Evolution [61.593935260052795]
Post-training viaSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) is crucial for enhancing reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>Existing paradigms often reach a performance bottleneck due to the limitations of static data.<n>We propose Anchor Evolution (AnE), a new paradigm that integrates truth-anchored data curation and model evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-25T08:26:34Z) - Internalizing LLM Reasoning via Discovery and Replay of Latent Actions [4.830503861275364]
Internalization of chain-of-thought processes into hidden states has emerged as a highly efficient paradigm for scaling test-time compute.<n>We propose STIR (Self-Distilled Tools for Internal Reasoning), a framework that reformulates reasoning enhancement as a dynamic latent trajectory control problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T08:44:57Z) - CoG: Controllable Graph Reasoning via Relational Blueprints and Failure-Aware Refinement over Knowledge Graphs [53.199517625701475]
CoG is a training-free framework inspired by Dual-Process Theory that mimics the interplay between intuition and deliberation.<n>CoG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both accuracy and efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T07:27:40Z) - RISER: Orchestrating Latent Reasoning Skills for Adaptive Activation Steering [62.63376387138257]
We propose a plug-and-play intervention framework that adaptively steers large language models (LLMs) reasoning in activation space.<n>RISER constructs a library of reusable reasoning vectors and employs a lightweight Router to dynamically compose them for each input.<n>The Router is optimized via reinforcement learning under task-level rewards, activating latent cognitive primitives in an emergent and compositional manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T08:04:33Z) - Rethinking Reasoning Quality in Large Language Models through Enhanced Chain-of-Thought via RL [19.659532349434418]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently become the dominant paradigm for strengthening the reasoning abilities of large language models.<n>Yet the rule-based reward functions commonly used on mathematical or programming benchmarks assess only answer format and correctness.<n>We propose Dynamic Reasoning Efficiency Reward (DRER) -- a plug-and-play RL reward framework that reshapes both reward and advantage signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-07T11:52:18Z) - SEAL: Steerable Reasoning Calibration of Large Language Models for Free [58.931194824519935]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated compelling capabilities for complex reasoning tasks via the extended chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning mechanism.<n>Recent studies reveal substantial redundancy in the CoT reasoning traces, which negatively impacts model performance.<n>We introduce SEAL, a training-free approach that seamlessly calibrates the CoT process, improving accuracy while demonstrating significant efficiency gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T02:42:07Z) - Unveiling the Magic of Code Reasoning through Hypothesis Decomposition and Amendment [54.62926010621013]
We introduce a novel task, code reasoning, to provide a new perspective for the reasoning abilities of large language models.<n>We summarize three meta-benchmarks based on established forms of logical reasoning, and instantiate these into eight specific benchmark tasks.<n>We present a new pathway exploration pipeline inspired by human intricate problem-solving methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T10:39:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.