On Test-Time Scaling for Vision-Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28864v2
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 18:10:39 GMT
- Title: On Test-Time Scaling for Vision-Language Models
- Abstract summary: We present the first comprehensive study of test-time scaling for Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>Our main findings are that small, well-performing models benefit the most from test-time scaling, enabling performance improvements of up to around 30%.<n>Visual information is encoded early in the reasoning chain, after which the chain is dominated by text-only reasoning and the contribution of image tokens drops significantly.
- Score: 28.89310866658917
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Test-time scaling is a paradigm where large models use additional compute at inference to achieve better performance, without changing model weights. While it has been widely studied for Large Language Models (LLMs), its applicability to Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) remains less explored and analyzed, with limited analysis of whether, when, and to what extent these approaches transfer to LVLMs. In this work, we ask a simple but fundamental question: can conventional test-time scaling methods developed for LLMs be directly applied to LVLMs? We present the first comprehensive study of test-time scaling for LVLMs, spanning multiple models and model sizes, nine test-time scaling methods, and six diverse benchmarks. Our main findings is that 1) different from previous findings, small, well-performing models benefit the most from test-time scaling, enabling performance improvements of up to around 30\%, reaching large models performance, and often outperforming them, 2) LVLMs lose focus when given more compute than necessary, and 3) Visual information is encoded early in the reasoning chain, after which the chain is dominated by text-only reasoning and the contribution of image tokens drops significantly. Finally, we also provide a global and fine-grained analysis on the quality and information sufficiency of the reasoning chains produced. Overall, our findings and analysis provide practical guidance and insights into LVLMs and their deployment in research and industry.
Related papers
- A Comprehensive Information-Decomposition Analysis of Large Vision-Language Models [24.18585407100395]
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) achieve impressive performance, yet their internal decision-making processes remain opaque.<n>We introduce a novel framework using partial information decomposition (PID) to quantitatively measure the "information spectrum" of LVLMs.<n>Our analysis reveals two key results: (i) two task regimes (synergy-driven vs. knowledge-driven) and (ii) two stable, contrasting family-level strategies (fusion-centric vs. language-centric)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-31T12:32:29Z) - Quantization Meets dLLMs: A Systematic Study of Post-training Quantization for Diffusion LLMs [78.09559830840595]
We present the first systematic study on quantizing diffusion-based language models.<n>We identify the presence of activation outliers, characterized by abnormally large activation values.<n>We implement state-of-the-art PTQ methods and conduct a comprehensive evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-20T17:59:51Z) - Test-Time Learning for Large Language Models [33.11605667376906]
We propose a Test-Time Learning (TTL) paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>LLMs dynamically adapts to target domains using only unlabeled test data during testing.<n>We demonstrate through experiments that TLM improves performance by at least 20% compared to original LLMs on domain knowledge adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T02:18:59Z) - LLaVA-MORE: A Comparative Study of LLMs and Visual Backbones for Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning [39.54891426369773]
Trade-offs between model size, architecture, and performance remain underexplored.<n>In this paper, we introduce LLaVA-MORE, a new family of MLLMs that integrates recent language models with diverse visual backbones.<n>To ensure fair comparisons, we employ a unified training protocol applied consistently across all architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-19T18:10:12Z) - Generalization v.s. Memorization: Tracing Language Models' Capabilities Back to Pretraining Data [76.90128359866462]
We introduce an extended concept of memorization, distributional memorization, which measures the correlation between the output probabilities and the pretraining data frequency.<n>This study demonstrates that memorization plays a larger role in simpler, knowledge-intensive tasks, while generalization is the key for harder, reasoning-based tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-20T21:24:40Z) - SLMRec: Distilling Large Language Models into Small for Sequential Recommendation [38.51895517016953]
Sequential Recommendation task involves predicting the next item a user is likely to interact with, given their past interactions.<n>Recent research demonstrates the great impact of LLMs on sequential recommendation systems.<n>Due to the huge size of LLMs, it is inefficient and impractical to apply a LLM-based model in real-world platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T07:12:06Z) - Temporal Scaling Law for Large Language Models [70.74571133406958]
We propose the novel concept of Temporal Scaling Law, studying how the test loss of an LLM evolves as the training steps scale up.<n>In contrast to modeling the test loss as a whole in a coarse-grained manner, we break it down and dive into the fine-grained test loss of each token position.<n>We derive the much more precise temporal scaling law by studying the temporal patterns of the parameters in the dynamic hyperbolic-law.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-27T05:49:11Z) - Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering.
The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored.
We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z) - Retrieval-based Knowledge Transfer: An Effective Approach for Extreme
Large Language Model Compression [64.07696663255155]
Large-scale pre-trained language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
However, the massive size of these models poses huge challenges for their deployment in real-world applications.
We introduce a novel compression paradigm called Retrieval-based Knowledge Transfer (RetriKT) which effectively transfers the knowledge of LLMs to extremely small-scale models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T07:58:20Z) - To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisis [50.31589712761807]
Large language models (LLMs) are notoriously token-hungry during pre-training, and high-quality text data on the web is approaching its scaling limit for LLMs.
We investigate the consequences of repeating pre-training data, revealing that the model is susceptible to overfitting.
Second, we examine the key factors contributing to multi-epoch degradation, finding that significant factors include dataset size, model parameters, and training objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:02:15Z) - Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding
Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learning [104.58874584354787]
In recent years, pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in achieving an inference-time few-shot learning capability known as in-context learning.
This study aims to examine the in-context learning phenomenon through a Bayesian lens, viewing real-world LLMs as latent variable models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-27T18:59:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.