ATM: CID-Brokered Pre-Write Admission for Multi-Agent Code Co-Synthesis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00041v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:02:38 GMT
• Title: ATM: CID-Brokered Pre-Write Admission for Multi-Agent Code Co-Synthesis
• Abstract summary: The AI-Atomic-Framework (ATM) is a specification-grounded governance substrate for software agents operating within a single governance domain.<n>ATM binds task intent, repository scope, write admission, validation, and evidence obligations into one governance chain.<n>The results support feasibility, auditability, and bounded recoverability within the observed single-domain settings, but do not claim broad comparative superiority or cross-clone governance.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-agent LLM systems can decompose software-engineering work into planning, generation, validation, and repair, but a narrower systems problem remains: before any governed shared mutation is applied, a system must decide which concurrently formed write intents may proceed in parallel, which require deterministic composition or serialization, and which must take a fail-closed path. We address this problem with the AI-Atomic-Framework (ATM), a specification-grounded governance substrate for software agents operating within a single governance domain. ATM binds task intent, repository scope, write admission, validation, and evidence obligations into one governance chain. A Content Identifier (CID) broker serves as the shared-mutation admission subsystem. Adapter-guided atomization maps write intents to semantic atoms and bounded regions; when persistent atom-map coverage is incomplete, virtual atoms provide temporary auditable governance units for conservative comparison and routing. Governed shared writes are ultimately applied by a neutral steward rather than directly by proposing agents. Evaluation combines controlled, field, adoption, and extension evidence, including a 12-scenario deterministic design matrix, three archived runner cases, ATM-AdmissionBench, three archived same-file boundary cases, a three-week external-adopter study, and an operational recovery-routing benchmark. The results support feasibility, auditability, and bounded recoverability within the observed single-domain settings, but do not claim broad comparative superiority or cross-clone governance.

Related papers

• AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities [55.23913617185508]
  Agent is an open-source, lightweight, and infrastructure for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs)-based agents.<n>It organizes the evaluation process around three independent components, namely Benchmark, Harness and Environment.<n>It features a fault-tolerant runtime and comprehensive trajectory analysis tools to transparently diagnose failure modes like reward-hacking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T11:11:17Z)
• EfficientGraph-RAG: Structured Retrieval-State Management for Cross-Task Retrieval-Augmented Generation [45.66803833786235]
  Retrieval-augmented generation has become the standard way to ground large language models in external knowledge.<n> EfficientGraph-RAG ranks first on the reported answer-quality metrics averaged over the three evaluated LongBench retrieval-style subsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T03:08:53Z)
• PRIMA: Operational Patterns for Resilient Multi-Agent Research with Verifiable Identity and Convergent Feedback [0.0]
  PRIMA operates as coordinated multi-agent research systems over multi-hour runs.<n>Main contributions are three operational patterns for surviving failure modes.<n>A Graph Isomorphism case study grounds the architectural claims in a generated artifact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T23:27:46Z)
• SARC: A Governance-by-Architecture Framework for Agentic AI Systems [0.0]
  Agentic AI systems increasingly act through tools, sub-agents, and external services, but governance controls are still commonly attached to prompts, dashboards, or post-hoc documentation.<n>We introduce SARC, a runtime governance architecture for tool-using agents that treats constraints as first-class specification objects alongside state, action space, and reward.<n>SARC executes zero hard-constraint violations under exact predicates; its declared PAA throttling response reduces soft-window overages by 89.5% relative to policy-as-code-only.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T13:34:36Z)
• Authorization Propagation in Multi-Agent AI Systems: Identity Governance as Infrastructure [0.0]
  We call this problem authorization propagation.<n>It is not reducible to prompt injection and is not fully addressed by classical access-control models such as RBAC, ABAC, or ReBAC.<n>The paper formalizes authorization propagation as a workflow-level property, identifies three sub-problems, and derives seven structural requirements for authorization architectures in multi-agent AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T20:56:17Z)
• A Trace-Based Assurance Framework for Agentic AI Orchestration: Contracts, Testing, and Governance [0.22940141855172028]
  This paper presents an assurance framework for Agentic AI systems using Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Executions are instrumented as Message-Action Traces (MAT) with explicit step and trace contracts.<n>The framework includes stress testing, formulated as a budgeted counterexample search over bounded perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T10:23:48Z)
• From Prompt-Response to Goal-Directed Systems: The Evolution of Agentic AI Software Architecture [0.0]
  Agentic AI denotes an architectural transition from stateless, prompt-driven generative models toward goal-directed systems.<n>This paper examines this transition by connecting intelligent agent theories, with contemporary LLM-centric approaches.<n>The study identifies a convergence toward standardized agent loops, registries, and auditable control mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T03:34:48Z)
• NEMO: Execution-Aware Optimization Modeling via Autonomous Coding Agents [41.70615840873279]
  We present NEMO, a system that translates Natural-language descriptions of decision problems into formal Executable Mathematical Optimization implementations.<n>NEMO centers on remote interaction with autonomous coding agents (ACAs), treated as a first-class abstraction analogous to API-based interaction with LLMs.<n>Because ACAs execute within sandboxed environments, code produced by NEMO is executable by construction, allowing automated validation and repair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T07:57:23Z)
• From Laboratory to Real-World Applications: Benchmarking Agentic Code Reasoning at the Repository Level [38.24989792739013]
  We present RepoReason, a diagnostic benchmark centered on abductive assertion verification.<n>We implement an execution-driven mutation framework that utilizes the environment as a semantic to regenerate ground-truth states.<n>Our findings provide granular white-box insights for optimizing the next generation of agentic software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T09:22:28Z)
• Laser: Governing Long-Horizon Agentic Search via Structured Protocol and Context Register [38.329346729947304]
  We introduce Laser, a framework for stabilizing and scaling agentic search.<n>Laser organizes agent behaviors into three spaces: planning, task-solving, and retrospection.<n>Laser consistently outperforms existing agentic search baselines under both prompting-only and fine-tuning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T15:53:33Z)
• AI Bill of Materials and Beyond: Systematizing Security Assurance through the AI Risk Scanning (AIRS) Framework [31.261980405052938]
  Assurance for artificial intelligence (AI) systems remains fragmented across software supply-chain security, adversarial machine learning, and governance documentation.<n>This paper introduces the AI Risk Scanning (AIRS) Framework, a threat-model-based, evidence-generating framework designed to operationalize AI assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-16T16:10:38Z)
• Diagnose, Localize, Align: A Full-Stack Framework for Reliable LLM Multi-Agent Systems under Instruction Conflicts [75.20929587906228]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-powered multi-agent systems (MAS) have rapidly advanced collaborative reasoning, tool use, and role-specialized coordination in complex tasks.<n>However, reliability-critical deployment remains hindered by a systemic failure mode: hierarchical compliance under instruction conflicts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T08:43:34Z)
• MA-RAG: Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Collaborative Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [36.3918410061572]
  MA-RAG addresses the inherent ambiguities and reasoning challenges in complex information-seeking tasks.<n>Unlike conventional RAG methods that rely on end-to-end fine-tuning or isolated component enhancements, MA-RAG orchestrates a collaborative set of specialized AI agents.<n>Our results highlight the effectiveness of collaborative, modular reasoning in retrieval-augmented systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:05:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.