LV-ROVER-MLT: Low-Resource Maltese OCR by Multi-Stream Voting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00250v2
• Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 11:05:21 GMT
• Title: LV-ROVER-MLT: Low-Resource Maltese OCR by Multi-Stream Voting
• Abstract summary: This paper reports results on a benchmark against a fine-tuned Tesseract baseline with a character error rate of 0.0234.<n> Ensemble recognition alone, scored under the same label convention as the baseline, improves character error rate by 44 percent to 0.01317.<n>A post-processing chain that aligns Tesseract's straight-quote and dash output to the benchmark's curly-quote convention, plus one stage that recovers misread diacritics, brings the full pipeline to a character error rate of 0.00700.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Maltese, although a low-resource language, has its own text corpora and pretrained language models, but we are aware of only one real labelled PDF corpus for OCR training, 57 pages, far below what paragraph-level training needs. With no real corpus to train on at scale, we built a synthetic training pipeline and a 5-stream Tesseract ensemble voted under a lexicon-anchored, ROVER-style scheme adapted for a low-resource setting. We call the Maltese submission LV-ROVER-MLT: an engineered adaptation of LV-ROVER's voting algorithm, not a new one, submitted to the DocEng 2026 competition. All results below are dev-set figures from the competition's own benchmark; the held-out real test CER is unknown at the time of writing and this paper does not claim one. We report results on a 422-paragraph benchmark against a fine-tuned Tesseract baseline with a character error rate of 0.0234. Ensemble recognition alone, scored under the same label convention as the baseline, improves character error rate by 44 percent to 0.01317. A post-processing chain that aligns Tesseract's straight-quote and dash output to the benchmark's curly-quote convention, plus one stage that recovers misread diacritics, brings the full pipeline to a character error rate of 0.00700, a 70 percent reduction. We also tested the same method, unchanged, on Hungarian and Luxembourgish: a bootstrap and permutation audit confirms a 33.7 percent character error rate improvement on Luxembourgish, while the Hungarian margin, 0.8 percent, is not statistically significant.

Related papers

• Contrastive ESA: Human Evaluation of Multiple Translations at Once [45.918020796451536]
  We introduce Contrastive Error Span.<n>(cESA) a protocol that presents multiple translations of the source input (text, video, audio, image).<n>In cESA, the annotator sees multiple translations of the same document, marks major and minor error spans, and then assigns a score from 0% to 100% on absolute scale.<n>We validate cESA using a large-scale human evaluation of English->Japanese translations of 12 models, demonstrating reductions in annotation time and noise compared to standard pointwise evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T09:01:59Z)
• Robust Assamese Speech Recognition through Controlled Fine-Tuning of Whisper Models [1.4095958360608893]
  This paper presents a controlled, fine-tuned Whisper-based Assamese ASR system trained on the Mozilla Common Voice 24.0-Assamese corpus.<n>A hardware-aware optimized training pipeline is implemented for resource-constrained environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-19T09:54:52Z)
• Can OCR-VLMs Read Devanagari? A Stress-Test Benchmark and Post-Correction Study [0.0]
  OCR systems report strong results on English and Chinese document benchmarks, yet their behaviour on Indic scripts is largely uncharacterised.<n>We benchmark ten systems on Devanagari (Hindi): classical EasyOCR; open VLMs (Qwen2.5-VL-3B, Qwen3-VL-8B, olmOCR-7B); specialised OCR-VLMs (DeepSeek-OCR, Unlimited-OCR); and frontier closed models (Gemini 2.5 Flash, Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, Mistral OCR)<n>We release the benchmark, code, and models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-28T05:46:05Z)
• Jury Duty: Calibration and Orientation Failures in MLLM-as-a-Judge Under Cultural Ambiguity [43.23157850664282]
  We introduce VOIR DIRE, a multimodal benchmark of 626 culturally paired image-prompt artifacts spanning U.S. and mainland Chinese contexts.<n>Across six MLLMs, the bias decomposes into two failures: a positivity-floor calibration failure and an orientation failure.<n>We recommend reporting alignment against each reference pool separately and treating cross-pool divergence as a judge property.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T15:53:40Z)
• RobustSpeechFlow: Learning Robust Text-to-Speech Trajectories via Augmentation-based Contrastive Flow Matching [10.755921557009307]
  RobustSpeechFlow is a training strategy that improves alignment by extending contrastive flow matching with length-preserving repeat and skip latent augmentations.<n>It reduces word error rate (WER) from 1.44 to 1.38 using only 0.06B parameters.<n>It delivers consistent intelligibility improvements across diverse speaker and prosody conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T07:22:28Z)
• Locale-Conditioned Few-Shot Prompting Mitigates Demonstration Regurgitation in On-Device PII Substitution with Small Language Models [2.2228811750157482]
  PII redaction usually replaces detected entities with placeholder tokens such as [PERSON].<n>We propose a fully on-device pipeline that substitutes PII with consistent, type-preserving fake values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:47:11Z)
• GlotOCR Bench: OCR Models Still Struggle Beyond a Handful of Unicode Scripts [58.92151016423978]
  We introduce GlotOCR Bench, a comprehensive benchmark evaluating OCR across 100+ Unicode scripts.<n>Our benchmark comprises clean and degraded image variants rendered from real multilingual texts.<n>We evaluate a broad suite of open-weight and proprietary vision-language models and find that most perform well on fewer than ten scripts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T17:12:41Z)
• Benchmarking Multilingual Speech Models on Pashto: Zero-Shot ASR, Script Failure, and Cross-Domain Evaluation [0.0]
  Pashto is spoken by approximately 60--80 million people but has no published benchmarks for multilingual automatic speech recognition (ASR) on any shared public test set.<n>This paper reports the first reproducible multi-model evaluation on public Pashto data, covering zero-shot ASR, script-level failure, and cross-domain evaluation of fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T11:23:42Z)
• Omnilingual SONAR: Cross-Lingual and Cross-Modal Sentence Embeddings Bridging Massively Multilingual Text and Speech [61.759910921200834]
  Cross-lingual sentence encoders typically cover only a few hundred languages.<n>We introduce OmniSONAR, a new family of omnilingual, cross-lingual and cross-language sentence embedding models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T14:47:35Z)
• The Patrologia Graeca Corpus: OCR, Annotation, and Open Release of Noisy Nineteenth-Century Polytonic Greek Editions [0.0]
  We present the Patrologia Graeca Corpus, the first large-scale open OCR and linguistic resource for nineteenthcentury editions of Ancient Greek.<n>The collection covers the remaining undigitized volumes of the Patrologia Graeca (PG), printed in complex bilingual (Greek-Latin) layouts and characterized by highly degraded polytonic Greek typography.<n>We achieve a character error rate (CER) of 1.05% and a word error rate (WER) of 4.69%, largely outperforming existing OCR systems for polytonic Greek.<n>The resulting corpus contains around six million lemmatized and part-of-speech tagged tokens, aligned with full
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T10:21:54Z)
• From Black Box to Glass Box: Cross-Model ASR Disagreement to Prioto Review in Ambient AI Scribe Documentation [43.148402136307716]
  Cross-model disagreement among heterogeneous ASR systems can act as a reference-free uncertainty signal.<n>We transcribed 50 publicly available medical audio clips with eight ASR systems spanning commercial APIs and open-source engines.<n>Low-agreement regions were enriched for content disagreements, with the content fraction increasing from 53.9% to 73.9% across quintiles of high-risk mass.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T13:02:13Z)
• Why Stop at Words? Unveiling the Bigger Picture through Line-Level OCR [4.917745659609699]
  We propose a natural progression from word level OCR to line-level OCR.<n>We show that the proposed technique not only improves the accuracy but also efficiency of OCR.<n>Our experimentation revealed a notable end-to-end accuracy improvement of 5.4%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T15:02:11Z)
• KITAB-Bench: A Comprehensive Multi-Domain Benchmark for Arabic OCR and Document Understanding [24.9462694200992]
  KITAB-Bench is a comprehensive Arabic OCR benchmark that fills the gaps in current evaluation systems.<n>Modern vision-language models (such as GPT-4o, Gemini, and Qwen) outperform traditional OCR approaches by an average of 60% in Character Error Rate (CER)<n>This work establishes a rigorous evaluation framework that can drive improvements in Arabic document analysis methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T18:41:23Z)
• CC-OCR: A Comprehensive and Challenging OCR Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models in Literacy [50.78228433498211]
  CC-OCR comprises four OCR-centric tracks: multi-scene text reading, multilingual text reading, document parsing, and key information extraction.<n>It includes 39 subsets with 7,058 full annotated images, of which 41% are sourced from real applications, and released for the first time.<n>We evaluate nine prominent LMMs and reveal both the strengths and weaknesses of these models, particularly in text grounding, multi-orientation, and hallucination of repetition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T07:03:25Z)
• Scaling A Simple Approach to Zero-Shot Speech Recognition [45.83866201822545]
  MMS Zero-shot reduces the average character error rate by a relative 46% over 100 unseen languages. Our approach is only 2.5x higher compared to in-domain supervised baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T08:08:55Z)
• LOCR: Location-Guided Transformer for Optical Character Recognition [55.195165959662795]
  We propose LOCR, a model that integrates location guiding into the transformer architecture during autoregression. We train the model on a dataset comprising over 77M text-location pairs from 125K academic document pages, including bounding boxes for words, tables and mathematical symbols. It outperforms all existing methods in our test set constructed from arXiv, as measured by edit distance, BLEU, METEOR and F-measure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T15:34:12Z)
• User-Centric Evaluation of OCR Systems for Kwak'wala [92.73847703011353]
  We show that utilizing OCR reduces the time spent in the manual transcription of culturally valuable documents by over 50%. Our results demonstrate the potential benefits that OCR tools can have on downstream language documentation and revitalization efforts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-26T21:41:15Z)
• Few-Shot Cross-lingual Transfer for Coarse-grained De-identification of Code-Mixed Clinical Texts [56.72488923420374]
  Pre-trained language models (LMs) have shown great potential for cross-lingual transfer in low-resource settings. We show the few-shot cross-lingual transfer property of LMs for named recognition (NER) and apply it to solve a low-resource and real-world challenge of code-mixed (Spanish-Catalan) clinical notes de-identification in the stroke.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-10T21:46:52Z)
• Lexically Aware Semi-Supervised Learning for OCR Post-Correction [90.54336622024299]
  Much of the existing linguistic data in many languages of the world is locked away in non-digitized books and documents. Previous work has demonstrated the utility of neural post-correction methods on recognition of less-well-resourced languages. We present a semi-supervised learning method that makes it possible to utilize raw images to improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-04T04:39:02Z)
• Neural OCR Post-Hoc Correction of Historical Corpora [4.427447378048202]
  We propose a neural approach based on a combination of recurrent (RNN) and deep convolutional network (ConvNet) to correct OCR transcription errors. We show that our models are robust in capturing diverse OCR transcription errors and reduce the word error rate of 32.3% by more than 89%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-01T01:35:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.