Open Source Is Not One Thing: A Typology of Open-Source Software Sub-Genres

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01750v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 06:07:12 GMT
• Title: Open Source Is Not One Thing: A Typology of Open-Source Software Sub-Genres
• Abstract summary: We argue that open source software (OSS) comprises distinguishable sub-genres.<n>We place the sub-genres in a framework that records each one's primary driver, governance, and funding.<n>We present a research agenda whose central question is whether findings established on one sub-genre transfer to others.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Open source software (OSS) is not homogeneous. A project's purpose, governance, and funding shape how its community forms, who contributes, and how the software is maintained, yet empirical research often samples OSS broadly and reports findings as if they held for open source as a whole. We argue that OSS comprises distinguishable sub-genres, and that the sub-genre a study samples bounds how far its findings generalize. Using a light, multi-source review that screens 3,925 unique papers, we synthesize a typology of fourteen OSS sub-genres, from well-studied ones such as community-driven, company-backed, foundation-governed, research and scientific, and open source for social good (OSS4SG), to under-studied ones such as multi-company co-opetition, protestware, and open-source appropriate technology. We place the sub-genres in a framework that records each one's primary driver, governance, and funding, with its maturity in the literature and representative projects, and we present a research agenda whose central question is whether findings established on one sub-genre transfer to others. The contribution is the typology and the agenda rather than a complete census, and we mark the sub-genres whose empirical support is thin.

Related papers

• Personalized Auto-Research: Towards a True AI Co-Scientist [90.01790420664169]
  Given a research goal, state-of-the-art systems remain researcher-agnostic.<n>What counts as novel, valuable, or feasible depends on the researcher.<n>We propose a framework that threads a graph-grounded researcher context through retrieval, hypothesis search, experimentation, writing, and review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-14T20:43:27Z)
• OmniRetrieval: Unified Retrieval across Heterogeneous Knowledge Sources [67.62754856088591]
  Existing retrievers operate over one source at a time under a fixed query language.<n>We present OmniRetrieval, a framework that takes any natural-language query and identifies appropriate knowledge sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:10:35Z)
• Paper Circle: An Open-source Multi-agent Research Discovery and Analysis Framework [82.66443886385125]
  Paper Circle is a discovery and analysis system designed to reduce the effort required to find, assess, organize, and understand academic literature.<n>The system comprises two complementary pipelines: (1) a Discovery Pipeline that integrates offline and online retrieval from multiple sources, multi-agent scoring, diversity-aware ranking, and structured outputs; and (2) an Analysis Pipeline that transforms individual papers into structured knowledge graphs with typed nodes such as concepts, methods, and figures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T17:59:58Z)
• An Automated Grey Literature Extraction Tool for Software Engineering [3.3367150713199636]
  We present GLiSE, a prompt-driven tool that turns a research topic prompt into platform-specific queries.<n>It gathers results from common software-engineering web sources (GitHub, Stack Overflow) and Google Search.<n>It uses embedding-based semantic classifiers to filter and rank results according to their relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-28T20:20:58Z)
• Open Source Software Lifecycle Classification: Developing Wrangling Techniques for Complex Sociotechnical Systems [0.0]
  This paper reviews previous attempts to classify open source software and other organizational ecosystems.<n>It examines the divergent and sometimes conflicting purposes that may exist for classifying open source projects and how these competing interests impede our progress in developing a comprehensive understanding of how open source software projects and companies operate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T12:37:53Z)
• Discovering Ideologies of the Open Source Software Movement [7.737205032218083]
  Open source software (OSS) development has expanded to broader social movements from the initial product development aims.<n>We developed a comprehensive empirical framework of OSS ideology.<n>A framework of OSS ideology emerged with six key categories: membership, norms/values, goals, activities, resources, and positions/group relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T04:26:27Z)
• Towards An Empirical Theory of Ideologies in the Open Source Software Movement [7.737205032218083]
  The literature on open source ideology is often fragile, or lacking in empirical evidence. We analyzed data from 22 semi-structured interviews and 41 video recordings of Open Source Initiative (OSI) board members' public speeches. An empirical theory of OSS ideology emerged, with six key categories: membership, norms/values, goals, activities, resources, and positions/group relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T20:43:59Z)
• Towards Corpus-Scale Discovery of Selection Biases in News Coverage: Comparing What Sources Say About Entities as a Start [65.28355014154549]
  This paper investigates the challenges of building scalable NLP systems for discovering patterns of media selection biases directly from news content in massive-scale news corpora. We show the capabilities of the framework through a case study on NELA-2020, a corpus of 1.8M news articles in English from 519 news sources worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T23:36:45Z)
• Deep learning for table detection and structure recognition: A survey [49.09628624903334]
  The goal of this survey is to provide a profound comprehension of the major developments in the field of Table Detection. We provide an analysis of both classic and new applications in the field. The datasets and source code of the existing models are organized to provide the reader with a compass on this vast literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T19:42:27Z)
• "Don't quote me on that": Finding Mixtures of Sources in News Articles [85.92467549469147]
  We construct an ontological labeling system for sources based on each source's textitaffiliation and textitrole We build a probabilistic model to infer these attributes for named sources and to describe news articles as mixtures of these sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T21:57:11Z)
• Which contributions count? Analysis of attribution in open source [0.0]
  We characterize contributor acknowledgment models in open source by analyzing thousands of projects. We find that community-generated systems of contribution acknowledgment make work like idea generation or bug finding more visible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-19T20:14:40Z)
• Domain Generalization: A Survey [146.68420112164577]
  Domain generalization (DG) aims to achieve OOD generalization by only using source domain data for model learning. For the first time, a comprehensive literature review is provided to summarize the ten-year development in DG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-03T16:12:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.