Relevance-Based Embeddings: Lightweight Candidate Retrieval via Heavy-Ranker Calls
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03515v1
- Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 17:41:37 GMT
- Title: Relevance-Based Embeddings: Lightweight Candidate Retrieval via Heavy-Ranker Calls
- Abstract summary: In machine learning applications, the most relevant items for a query should be efficiently retrieved.<n>A typical solution is to train another model that separately embeds queries and items to a vector space.<n>This allows one to search the relevant items through fast approximate nearest neighbor search at the cost of some reduction in quality.
- Score: 13.621771270112802
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In many machine learning applications, the most relevant items for a query should be efficiently retrieved. The relevance function is usually an expensive similarity model, making the exhaustive search infeasible. A typical solution is to train another model that separately embeds queries and items to a vector space, where similarity is defined via the dot product or cosine similarity. This allows one to search the relevant items through fast approximate nearest neighbor search at the cost of some reduction in quality. To compensate for this reduction, the found items (candidates) are re-ranked by the expensive ranking model. In this paper, we investigate an alternative approach to candidate selection that utilizes the scores of the expensive model to improve the representations of queries and items. The idea is to describe each query (item) by its relevance to a set of support items (queries) and use these new representations to obtain query (item) embeddings. We theoretically prove that such embeddings are powerful enough to approximate any complex similarity model (under mild conditions). We also investigate the choice of support items, which is a crucial ingredient of the proposed approach. The experiments on diverse academic and production datasets illustrate the power of our method.
Related papers
- DISCO: Diversifying Sample Condensation for Efficient Model Evaluation [59.01400190971061]
Costly evaluation reduces inclusivity, slows the cycle of innovation, and worsens environmental impact.<n>We argue that promoting diversity among samples is not essential; what matters is to select samples thatmaximise diversity in model responses.<n>Our method, $textbfDiversifying Sample Condensation (DISCO)$, selects the top-k samples with the greatest model disagreements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T08:53:59Z) - MultiConIR: Towards multi-condition Information Retrieval [38.864056667809095]
MultiConIR is a benchmark designed to evaluate retrieval and reranking models under nuanced multi-condition query scenarios.<n>Most retrievers and rerankers exhibit severe performance degradation as query complexity increases.<n>This work delves into the factors contributing to reranker performance deterioration and examines how condition positioning within queries affects similarity assessment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T05:02:03Z) - Relevance Filtering for Embedding-based Retrieval [46.851594313019895]
In embedding-based retrieval, Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) search enables efficient retrieval of similar items from large-scale datasets.
This paper introduces a novel relevance filtering component (called "Cosine Adapter") for embedding-based retrieval to address this challenge.
We are able to significantly increase the precision of the retrieved set, at the expense of a small loss of recall.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-09T06:21:20Z) - Retrieval with Learned Similarities [2.729516456192901]
State-of-the-art retrieval algorithms have migrated to learned similarities.<n>We show that Mixture-of-Logits (MoL) can be realized empirically to achieve superior performance on diverse retrieval scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T08:19:34Z) - Group Testing for Accurate and Efficient Range-Based Near Neighbor Search for Plagiarism Detection [2.3814052021083354]
This work presents an adaptive group testing framework for the range-based high dimensional near neighbor search problem.
Our method efficiently marks each item in a database as neighbor or non-neighbor of a query point, based on a cosine distance threshold without exhaustive search.
We show that, using softmax-based features, our method achieves a more than ten-fold speed-up over exhaustive search with no loss of accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-05T06:12:03Z) - Semantic Equivalence of e-Commerce Queries [6.232692545488813]
This paper introduces a framework to recognize and leverage query equivalence to enhance searcher and business outcomes.
The proposed approach addresses three key problems: mapping queries to vector representations of search intent, identifying nearest neighbor queries expressing equivalent or similar intent, and optimizing for user or business objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T18:40:13Z) - Answering Compositional Queries with Set-Theoretic Embeddings [43.926610595182126]
Box embeddings are a region-based representation that can be thought of as learnable Venn diagrams.
We present experiments and analysis providing insights into the behavior of both.
We find that, while vector and box embeddings are equally suited to single attribute queries, for compositional queries box embeddings provide substantial advantages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T04:04:36Z) - Query Expansion Using Contextual Clue Sampling with Language Models [69.51976926838232]
We propose a combination of an effective filtering strategy and fusion of the retrieved documents based on the generation probability of each context.
Our lexical matching based approach achieves a similar top-5/top-20 retrieval accuracy and higher top-100 accuracy compared with the well-established dense retrieval model DPR.
For end-to-end QA, the reader model also benefits from our method and achieves the highest Exact-Match score against several competitive baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-13T15:18:04Z) - CODER: An efficient framework for improving retrieval through
COntextualized Document Embedding Reranking [11.635294568328625]
We present a framework for improving the performance of a wide class of retrieval models at minimal computational cost.
It utilizes precomputed document representations extracted by a base dense retrieval method.
It incurs a negligible computational overhead on top of any first-stage method at run time, allowing it to be easily combined with any state-of-the-art dense retrieval method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-16T10:25:26Z) - How to Query An Oracle? Efficient Strategies to Label Data [59.89900843097016]
We consider the basic problem of querying an expert oracle for labeling a dataset in machine learning.
We present a randomized batch algorithm that operates on a round-by-round basis to label the samples and achieves a query rate of $O(fracNk2)$.
In addition, we present an adaptive greedy query scheme, which achieves an average rate of $approx 0.2N$ queries per sample with triplet queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-05T20:15:35Z) - Online Learning of Optimally Diverse Rankings [63.62764375279861]
We propose an algorithm that efficiently learns the optimal list based on users' feedback only.
We show that after $T$ queries, the regret of LDR scales as $O((N-L)log(T))$ where $N$ is the number of all items.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-13T12:13:20Z) - IRLI: Iterative Re-partitioning for Learning to Index [104.72641345738425]
Methods have to trade between obtaining high accuracy while maintaining load balance and scalability in distributed settings.
We propose a novel approach called IRLI, which iteratively partitions the items by learning the relevant buckets directly from the query-item relevance data.
We mathematically show that IRLI retrieves the correct item with high probability under very natural assumptions and provides superior load balancing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-17T23:13:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.