ProACT: Towards Breakdown-Aware Proactive Agent in Multi-User Collaboration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03730v1
• Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 06:36:06 GMT
• Title: ProACT: Towards Breakdown-Aware Proactive Agent in Multi-User Collaboration
• Abstract summary: ProACT is a breakdown-aware agent framework for multi-user collaboration.<n>It determines whether the current turn contains a collaboration breakdown requiring intervention, decides whether the agent should stay silent or speak, and, when speaking is needed, routes the case to a targeted collaboration skill.<n>It consistently improves collaborative appropriateness, non-interruptiveness, conciseness, and judged intervention quality over direct chat.
• Score: 12.930055759552616
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Conversational agents are increasingly embedded in human collaborative work, yet they remain fundamentally passive and reactive: they respond to explicit user requests rather than proactively recognizing moments when a team would benefit from timely intervention as human collaborators often do. This reactive design substantially limits the use of agents as active participants in multi-user collaboration, where disagreements, ambiguous goals, forgotten constraints, underspecified plans, discussion loops, and imbalanced participation can gradually undermine group progress. To move agents from passive assistants toward active participants in multi-user collaboration, we introduce ProACT, a breakdown-aware agent framework grounded in theories of common ground, collaborative planning, and coordination work. ProACT observes the speaker-attributed conversation history, determines whether the current turn contains a collaboration breakdown requiring intervention, decides whether the agent should stay silent or speak, and, when speaking is needed, routes the case to a targeted collaboration skill. We further introduce the first multi-user collaboration benchmark for evaluating proactive agents across project planning, product design, research collaboration, logistics, education, and resource-constrained decision making. Across 3,244 turn-level examples and five LLM backbones, ProACT consistently improves collaborative appropriateness, non-interruptiveness, conciseness, and judged intervention quality over direct chat.

Related papers

• PACT: Proactive Asking for Continual Task Assistance in Human-Robot Collaboration [62.13457838323877]
  We propose PACT (Proactive Asking for Continual Task Assistance), an ask-or-act framework that determines whether clarification should be sought before taking action.<n>We implement its primary learned instantiation using reinforcement learning and evaluate alternative instantiations under the same framework.<n>Experiments in multi-day embodied collaboration scenarios demonstrate that, compared with passive inference baselines, PACT consistently improves both assistance accuracy and clarification utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T02:22:02Z)
• SpeakRL: Synergizing Reasoning, Speaking, and Acting in Language Models with Reinforcement Learning [46.70182219204539]
  We introduce SpeakRL, a reinforcement learning (RL) method that enhances agents' conversational capabilities by rewarding proactive interactions with users.<n>We present a systematic analysis of reward design for conversational proactivity and propose a principled reward formulation for teaching agents to balance asking with acting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T10:08:53Z)
• Completion $\neq$ Collaboration: Scaling Collaborative Effort with Agents [48.95020665909723]
  We argue for a shift from building and assessing task completion agents to developing collaborative agents.<n>We introduce collaborative effort scaling, a framework that captures how an agent's utility grows with increasing user involvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T17:47:18Z)
• Learning "Partner-Aware" Collaborators in Multi-Party Collaboration [12.287537011305497]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly bring deployed in agentic settings where they act as collaborators with humans.<n>This paper builds on the AI alignment and safe interruptability literature to offer novel theoretical insights on collaborative behavior.<n>We propose Interruptible Collaborative Roleplayer (ICR)-a novel partner-aware learning algorithm to train CG-optimal collaborators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T00:05:48Z)
• Let's Roleplay: Examining LLM Alignment in Collaborative Dialogues [11.888786446094057]
  This paper examines how different alignment methods affect Large Language Models' effectiveness as partners in multiturn, multiparty collaborations.<n>Using a roleplay methodology, we evaluate interventions from differently-trained friction agents in collaborative task conversations.<n>Our results show that a friction-aware approach significantly outperforms common alignment baselines in helping both convergence to a common ground, or agreed-upon task-relevant propositions, and correctness of task outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T00:58:10Z)
• Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration [50.657070334404835]
  Collaborative Gym is a framework enabling asynchronous, tripartite interaction among agents, humans, and task environments.<n>We instantiate Co-Gym with three representative tasks in both simulated and real-world conditions.<n>Our findings reveal that collaborative agents consistently outperform their fully autonomous counterparts in task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T09:21:15Z)
• Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
  We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z)
• Interacting with Non-Cooperative User: A New Paradigm for Proactive Dialogue Policy [83.61404191470126]
  We propose a new solution named I-Pro that can learn Proactive policy in the Interactive setting. Specifically, we learn the trade-off via a learned goal weight, which consists of four factors. The experimental results demonstrate I-Pro significantly outperforms baselines in terms of effectiveness and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-07T14:11:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.