Operator-on-F complements value-equivalence: a planning-time diagnostic for latent world models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04464v1
• Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2026 19:09:07 GMT
• Title: Operator-on-F complements value-equivalence: a planning-time diagnostic for latent world models
• Abstract summary: We introduce a complementary diagnostic, operator-on-F, that compares a model's k-step latent pushforward to the environment's on an observable subset F.<n>On a TD-MPC2 size sweep over cheetah-run, reward-prediction error stays within [0.028, 0.091] for every model size.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: World-model evaluation for model-based reinforcement learning typically asks whether the learned model predicts reward and value well, which can leave planning-relevant errors in the model's latent rollouts unmeasured. We introduce a complementary diagnostic, operator-on-F, that compares a model's k-step latent pushforward to the environment's on an observable subset F, using the model's own predictor. On a TD-MPC2 size sweep over cheetah-run, reward-prediction error stays within [0.028, 0.091] for every model size - only about 3x variation - so an unnormalized reward-fit check has narrow resolution to distinguish them; the (unnormalized) Bellman residual and reward error themselves have weak relationships with return (Spearman -0.10 and -0.30). Operator error spans 0.28 to 2.62 over the same sizes. At 317M the operator error is 2.62 - an order of magnitude above the 0.28-0.36 cluster - and the planning return collapses to 0.9, while reward-prediction error (0.091) is the highest of the five but stays within the same small [0.028, 0.091] range as the rest of the sweep. The rank correlation between operator error and return loss is -0.90 (anchor-bootstrap 95% CI [-0.90, -0.70] at n=5 sizes; leave-one-out removal of any single size leaves it at -0.80 or stronger). The operator also returns informative, architecture-discriminating estimates in a cross-architecture comparison between TD-MPC2 and a pure-SSL latent world model. The operator diagnostic complements value-equivalence rather than replacing it.

Related papers

• Agent Behavioral Contracts II: Certifying Compositional Reliability Without Assuming Independence [0.0]
  Two instances of one model, in a two-agent handoff, co-fail on 90.0% of the missions on which either fails.<n>Substituting a different model reduces the association in six of six contrasts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T07:25:05Z)
• Accurate Ensembles, Fragile Narratives: Multi-Scale Stacking and a Fidelity Audit of LLM-Generated Explanations for Credit Risk [0.0]
  Credit scoring increasingly relies on models whose decision logic cannot be read off their parameters.<n>A common proposal closes that gap with a language model: compute feature attributions, hand them to an LLM, and let it write the rationale.<n>We build such a system end to end and test whether the second half of the promise holds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T13:22:14Z)
• Support Operation Factorization: Compositional Readout of Frozen Vision Encoders under Controlled Interventions [87.95757610455173]
  We introduce an injectively aligned leave-one-cell-out protocol over support x operation grids and SO-OPF.<n>We separate two questions that aggregate scores conflate: whether the carrier composes held-out bindings when the grid is known, and whether that grid can be recovered from flat cell labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T15:38:55Z)
• Distribution-First Population Simulation: Collapse, Calibration, and Recall in Non-WEIRD LLM Persona Modeling [0.0]
  Synthetic-population tools run every individual as an independent large language model (LLM) agent.<n>We show that this paradigm has a basic failure mode, and we set a distribution-first corrective against it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T15:45:57Z)
• Modeling Normal Is All You Need: Joint Latent Clustering for Anomaly Detection in Multimodal Cyber-Physical Systems [47.027290803102666]
  Normal behaviour is the union of many imbalanced, curved, thin-fringed operating regimes.<n>We model the normal law with a jointly learned latent representation plus explicit Gaussian-mixture mode clustering.<n>We evaluate under a deliberately fair protocol: raw point-wise metrics with no point adjustment, a trivial-detector difficulty split, prevalence-matched F1, and train-normal-only calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T10:10:00Z)
• When Does Combining Language Models Help? A Co-Failure Ceiling on Routing, Voting, and Mixture-of-Agents Across 67 Frontier Models [0.0]
  Multi-model LLM systems are used to beat single-model accuracy.<n>We show that their gain is capped by a quantity the field rarely reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-25T17:06:06Z)
• Perplexity Can Miss SAE Feature Damage Under Quantization [0.16921396880325779]
  Quantized models are judged acceptable when perplexity or downstream accuracy remains close to the full-precision original.<n>We test this by using a frozen sparse-autoencoder (SAE) as a fixed measurement basis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T01:17:05Z)
• Amplifying, Not Learning: Fine-Tuned AI Text Detectors Amplify a Pretrained Direction [51.56484100374058]
  Text detectors amplify a pretrained typicality axis; they do not construct an AI-vs-human boundary.<n>On raw encoders before any task supervision, projecting onto centroid(AI)-centroid(HC3) achieves NYT-vs-HC3 AUROC 0.806/0.944/0.834 across three architectures.<n>On RoBERTa-base, raw projection exceeds fine-tuning; on RoBERTa-base, full fine-tuning reduces discrimination below raw on both fluent-formal populations tested.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T19:08:38Z)
• ERRORQUAKE: Heavy-Tailed Error Severity Distributions in Open-Weight Large Language Models [0.0]
  Hallucination benchmarks report a single error count and treat all errors as equivalent, yet a wrong date and a fabricated court ruling differ by orders of magnitude.<n>We introduce Errorquake-10k, a benchmark scoring each response on a continuous 0-4 severity scale across 8 domains and 5 difficulty tiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T09:22:46Z)
• Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Recurrence Classification Using Machine Learning Models and Bayesian Neural Networks with Varying Priors: A SHAP-Based Interpretation of the Best Performing Model [0.0]
  Differentiated thyroid cancer DTC recurrence is a major public health concern.<n>This study introduces a comprehensive framework for DTC recurrence classification using a dataset containing 383 patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T06:31:31Z)
• Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendation [59.500347564280204]
  We propose a new Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation (AUR) framework. AUR consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model. As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T04:32:51Z)
• Interpretable (not just posthoc-explainable) medical claims modeling for discharge placement to prevent avoidable all-cause readmissions or death [2.198760145670348]
  We developed an inherently interpretable multilevel Bayesian framework for representing variation in regression coefficients. We used the framework to formulate a survival model for using medical claims to predict hospital readmission and death. We trained the model on a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2008 and 2011, based on their 2009--2011 inpatient episodes, and then tested the model on 2012 episodes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-28T06:19:32Z)
• Mismatched No More: Joint Model-Policy Optimization for Model-Based RL [172.37829823752364]
  We propose a single objective for jointly training the model and the policy, such that updates to either component increases a lower bound on expected return. Our objective is a global lower bound on expected return, and this bound becomes tight under certain assumptions. The resulting algorithm (MnM) is conceptually similar to a GAN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-06T13:43:27Z)
• Probing Model Signal-Awareness via Prediction-Preserving Input Minimization [67.62847721118142]
  We evaluate models' ability to capture the correct vulnerability signals to produce their predictions. We measure the signal awareness of models using a new metric we propose- Signal-aware Recall (SAR) The results show a sharp drop in the model's Recall from the high 90s to sub-60s with the new metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-25T20:05:23Z)
• TACRED Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the TACRED Relation Extraction Task [80.38130122127882]
  TACRED is one of the largest, most widely used crowdsourced datasets in Relation Extraction (RE) In this paper, we investigate the questions: Have we reached a performance ceiling or is there still room for improvement? We find that label errors account for 8% absolute F1 test error, and that more than 50% of the examples need to be relabeled.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T15:07:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.