Answer Set Programming Energised! End-to-End Neurosymbolic Reasoning and Learning with ASP and Energy Based Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08136v1
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 06:18:35 GMT
- Title: Answer Set Programming Energised! End-to-End Neurosymbolic Reasoning and Learning with ASP and Energy Based Models
- Abstract summary: We present a general neurosymbolic reasoning and learning methodology based on a modular integration of answer set programming with an energy based model substrate.<n>Key contributions are: (1) supporting joint optimisation in the continuous latent space through explicit ASP-based declarative semantics fully incorporating background knowledge, constraints, non-monotonic inference; and (2) advancing recent works at the interface of answer sets, probabilistic logic, and answer set modulo theories.
- Score: 2.258835270146628
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: We present a general neurosymbolic reasoning and learning methodology based on a modular integration of answer set programming with an energy based model substrate. Key contributions are: (1) supporting joint optimisation in the continuous latent space through explicit ASP-based declarative semantics fully incorporating background knowledge, constraints, non-monotonic inference; and (2) advancing recent works at the interface of answer sets, probabilistic logic, and answer set modulo theories by providing a generalised model and practical platform for ASP-centric robust, end-to-end training for applications in dynamic domains (e.g., involving perception and interaction). We provide a practical implementation, and demonstrate basic use and application (with MNIST), and evaluate with the visual question-answering benchmark Clevr and the multi-object tracking benchmark MOT.
Related papers
- Reward-Driven LLM Agent Workflows: Synthesizing POMDP Routing and Self-Correction for Autonomous Decision-Making [0.0]
This paper addresses key technical challenges in current large language model (LLM) agent applications, including long-horizon planning, sparse reward attribution, and dynamic environmental interaction.<n>The proposed architecture is based on the synthesis of core AI paradigms: Visual, Language, Generative, Graph, Multimodal, Reinforcement, and Agent Intelligence.<n>Ultimately, the resulting architecture offers a practical, scalable reference framework for developing artificial intelligence technologies in complex, multi-step autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-19T02:51:41Z) - Forging Spatial Intelligence: A Roadmap of Multi-Modal Data Pre-Training for Autonomous Systems [75.78934957242403]
Self-driving vehicles and drones require true Spatial Intelligence from multi-modal onboard sensor data.<n>This paper presents a framework for multi-modal pre-training, identifying the core set of techniques driving progress toward this goal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-30T17:58:01Z) - Foundation Model for Skeleton-Based Human Action Understanding [56.89025287217221]
This paper presents a Unified Skeleton-based Dense Representation Learning framework.<n>USDRL consists of a Transformer-based Dense Spatio-Temporal (DSTE), Multi-Grained Feature Decorrelation (MG-FD), and Multi-Perspective Consistency Training (MPCT)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-18T02:42:16Z) - Feature-Based vs. GAN-Based Learning from Demonstrations: When and Why [50.191655141020505]
This survey provides a comparative analysis of feature-based and GAN-based approaches to learning from demonstrations.<n>We argue that the dichotomy between feature-based and GAN-based methods is increasingly nuanced.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-08T11:45:51Z) - Integrating Neural and Symbolic Components in a Model of Pragmatic Question-Answering [9.043409663314419]
We propose a neuro-symbolic framework that enhances probabilistic cognitive models.<n>We examine various approaches to incorporating neural modules into the cognitive model.<n>We find that hybrid models can match or exceed the performance of traditional probabilistic models in predicting human answer patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T09:34:37Z) - KORGym: A Dynamic Game Platform for LLM Reasoning Evaluation [78.96590724864606]
We introduce the Knowledge Orthogonal Reasoning Gymnasium (KORGym), a dynamic evaluation platform inspired by KOR-Bench and Gymnasium.<n>KORGym offers over fifty games in either textual or visual formats and supports interactive, multi-turn assessments with reinforcement learning scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T16:06:32Z) - A Concept-Centric Approach to Multi-Modality Learning [3.828996378105142]
We introduce a new multi-modality learning framework to create a more efficient AI system.<n>Our framework achieves on par with benchmark models while demonstrating more efficient learning curves.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-18T13:40:21Z) - A Large-Scale Evaluation of Speech Foundation Models [110.95827399522204]
We establish the Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark (SUPERB) to study the effectiveness of the foundation model paradigm for speech.
We propose a unified multi-tasking framework to address speech processing tasks in SUPERB using a frozen foundation model followed by task-specialized, lightweight prediction heads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T00:03:16Z) - Entropy-Regularized Token-Level Policy Optimization for Language Agent Reinforcement [67.1393112206885]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise as intelligent agents in interactive decision-making tasks.
We introduce Entropy-Regularized Token-level Policy Optimization (ETPO), an entropy-augmented RL method tailored for optimizing LLMs at the token level.
We assess the effectiveness of ETPO within a simulated environment that models data science code generation as a series of multi-step interactive tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-09T07:45:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.