How Data Narratives Go Wrong: A Taxonomy of Issues Across the Data Communication Process

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10523v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 00:54:15 GMT
• Title: How Data Narratives Go Wrong: A Taxonomy of Issues Across the Data Communication Process
• Abstract summary: Data narratives emerge through a broader meaning-making process.<n>TIC organizes recurring breakdowns across six dimensions-data, analysis, visual encoding, text, reasoning, and interpretation.
• Score: 26.086155122956132
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Data narratives increasingly shape public understanding, but their failures are rarely just isolated factual errors or deceptive charts. Instead, they emerge through a broader meaning-making process in which quantitative evidence is transformed into claims, representations, and arguments. While prior work has examined these failures across disparate fields (e.g., statistics, visualization, and fact-checking), the community lacks a holistic lens to explain how these issues arise, propagate, and compound. To address this gap, we introduce TIC, a Taxonomy of Issues in Data Communication, synthesized from prior literature and refined through the qualitative annotation of 700 real-world data narratives from fact-checking sites, research datasets, and controversial media. TIC organizes recurring breakdowns across six dimensions-data, analysis, visual encoding, text, reasoning, and interpretation-and situates them within a framework spanning analysis, narrative construction, and audience reception. Alongside the taxonomy and process framework, we contribute a qualitatively annotated case corpus with coding justifications and an interactive browsing interface. Collectively, these contributions provide a structured lens for diagnosing problematic data narratives and informing future sociotechnical support for trustworthy data communication.

Related papers

• From Data Heterogeneity to Convergence: A Data-Centric Review of Federated Learning [35.26793524140591]
  Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution for data hunger in centralized learning.<n>FL enables privacy with multiple clients to train a shared-task model collaboratively without exposing their local data.<n>While being a key component in any learning system, data is also a primary source of vulnerabilities and challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T09:00:04Z)
• SemanticCite: Citation Verification with AI-Powered Full-Text Analysis and Evidence-Based Reasoning [0.0]
  We introduce SemanticCite, an AI-powered system that verifies citation accuracy through full-text source analysis.<n>Our approach combines multiple retrieval methods with a four-class classification system that captures nuanced claim-source relationships.<n>We contribute a comprehensive dataset of over 1,000 citations with detailed alignments, functional classifications, semantic annotations, and bibliometric metadata.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T10:05:21Z)
• CADS: A Systematic Literature Review on the Challenges of Abstractive Dialogue Summarization [7.234196390284036]
  This article summarizes the research on Transformer-based abstractive summarization for English dialogues.<n>We cover the main challenges present in dialog summarization (i.e., language, structure, comprehension, speaker, salience, and factuality)<n>We find that while some challenges, like language, have seen considerable progress, others, such as comprehension, factuality, and salience, remain difficult and hold significant research opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T17:30:22Z)
• Skews in the Phenomenon Space Hinder Generalization in Text-to-Image Generation [59.138470433237615]
  We introduce statistical metrics that quantify both the linguistic and visual skew of a dataset for relational learning. We show that systematically controlled metrics are strongly predictive of generalization performance. This work informs an important direction towards quality-enhancing the data diversity or balance to scaling up the absolute size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T03:18:39Z)
• How Well Do Text Embedding Models Understand Syntax? [50.440590035493074]
  The ability of text embedding models to generalize across a wide range of syntactic contexts remains under-explored. Our findings reveal that existing text embedding models have not sufficiently addressed these syntactic understanding challenges. We propose strategies to augment the generalization ability of text embedding models in diverse syntactic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T08:51:00Z)
• Enhancing Argument Structure Extraction with Efficient Leverage of Contextual Information [79.06082391992545]
  We propose an Efficient Context-aware model (ECASE) that fully exploits contextual information. We introduce a sequence-attention module and distance-weighted similarity loss to aggregate contextual information and argumentative information. Our experiments on five datasets from various domains demonstrate that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T08:47:10Z)
• Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
  We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs) We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z)
• ConvoSumm: Conversation Summarization Benchmark and Improved Abstractive Summarization with Argument Mining [61.82562838486632]
  We crowdsource four new datasets on diverse online conversation forms of news comments, discussion forums, community question answering forums, and email threads. We benchmark state-of-the-art models on our datasets and analyze characteristics associated with the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:17:13Z)
• Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Data [50.09608320112584]
  We argue that for complex language understanding tasks, all simple feature correlations are spurious. We theoretically analyze the difficulty of creating data for competency problems when human bias is taken into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T21:34:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.