Know Before Fix: QA-Driven Repository Knowledge Acquisition for Software Issue Resolution

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11111v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 05:41:01 GMT
• Title: Know Before Fix: QA-Driven Repository Knowledge Acquisition for Software Issue Resolution
• Abstract summary: ACQUIRE is a QA-driven framework for software issue resolution.<n>Mirroring how developers first comprehend unfamiliar code before attempting a fix, ACQUIRE explicitly acquires repository knowledge prior to repair.
• Score: 14.539105528943958
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: LLM-based coding agents have significantly advanced automated software issue resolution, yet they remain highly prone to factual errors caused by insufficient repository understanding. Recent methods attempt to mitigate this limitation through pre-repair repository exploration; however, their fix-driven strategies explore repositories without identifying the agent's knowledge gaps, often yielding imprecise context that fails to bridge the underlying understanding deficit. In this paper, we propose ACQUIRE, a QA-driven framework for software issue resolution. Mirroring how experienced developers first comprehend unfamiliar code before attempting a fix, ACQUIRE explicitly acquires repository knowledge prior to repair. The framework decouples knowledge acquisition from patch generation through two stages: in the first stage, a Questioner and an Answerer collaborate to acquire structured repository knowledge, where the Questioner poses targeted questions and the Answerer produces evidence-grounded answers through autonomous exploration; in the second stage, the Resolver leverages the resulting QA knowledge to generate informed patches. By transforming implicit knowledge gaps into explicit, factually reliable understanding, ACQUIRE accelerates knowledge-intensive repair stages and enables more accurate resolution. Experiments on SWE-bench Verified demonstrate that ACQUIRE consistently outperforms representative pre-repair methods, raising Pass@1 by up to 4.4 percentage points with modest additional cost and time.

Related papers

• SkillForge: Self-Distilling Agents for Project-Specific Issue Resolution [21.5992590228819]
  Large language model (LLM) based agents have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in automated software issue resolution.<n>They often struggle to resolve issues in a specific repository because they lack project-specific knowledge.<n>We propose SkillForge, a framework that proactively acquires project-specific knowledge from the repository itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-19T14:01:13Z)
• Knowledge-Enhanced Agentic Vulnerability Repair [20.715227299482947]
  KeaRepair is a novel agentic approach that grounds patch generation in verified program facts and high-level vulnerability knowledge.<n>It significantly outperforms existing approaches on 55 C/C++ vulnerabilities.<n>When paired with Gemini-3.1-Pro, KeaRepair successfully repairs 46 vulnerabilities, achieving a repair rate of 83.64%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T11:42:25Z)
• DeepRefine: Agent-Compiled Knowledge Refinement via Reinforcement Learning [60.35032268606525]
  Agent-compiled knowledge bases provide persistent external knowledge for large language model (LLM) agents in downstream tasks.<n>Yet their quality is systematically limited by emphincompleteness, emphincorrectness, and emphredundancy
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T12:48:31Z)
• Inferential Question Answering [67.54465021408724]
  We introduce Inferential QA -- a new task that challenges models to infer answers from answer-supporting passages which provide only clues.<n>To study this problem, we construct QUIT (QUestions requiring Inference from Texts) dataset, comprising 7,401 questions and 2.4M passages.<n>We show that methods effective on traditional QA tasks struggle in inferential QA: retrievers underperform, rerankers offer limited gains, and fine-tuning provides inconsistent improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T14:02:43Z)
• Multi-Agent End-to-End Vulnerability Management for Mitigating Recurring Vulnerabilities [9.2997229083124]
  Traditional static analysis methods struggle to precisely capture contextual dependencies.<n> recurring vulnerabilities emerge repeatedly due to code reuse and shared logic.<n>We present MAVM, a multi-agent framework for end-to-end recurring vulnerability management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T09:35:05Z)
• Lingxi: Repository-Level Issue Resolution Framework Enhanced by Procedural Knowledge Guided Scaling [17.25732448913281]
  Lingxi is an issue resolution framework that leverages procedural knowledge extracted from historical issue-fixing data.<n>Our comprehensive ablation study confirms that the success of Lingxi comes directly from its use of procedural knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T18:45:04Z)
• Scalable and Robust LLM Unlearning by Correcting Responses with Retrieved Exclusions [49.55618517046225]
  Language models trained on web-scale corpora risk memorizing and exposing sensitive information.<n>We propose Corrective Unlearning with Retrieved Exclusions (CURE), a novel unlearning framework.<n>CURE verifies model outputs for leakage and revises them into safe responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T09:07:45Z)
• Enhancing repository-level software repair via repository-aware knowledge graphs [13.747293341707563]
  Repository-level software repair faces challenges in bridging semantic gaps between issue descriptions and code patches.<n>Existing approaches, which rely on large language models (LLMs), are hindered by semantic ambiguities, limited understanding of structural context, and insufficient reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose a novel repository-aware knowledge graph (KG) that accurately links repository artifacts (issues and pull requests) and entities (files, classes, and functions)<n>A path-guided repair mechanism that leverages KG-mined paths, tracing through which allows us to augment contextual information along with explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T17:21:47Z)
• Fine-Grained Knowledge Structuring and Retrieval for Visual Question Answering [12.622529359686016]
  Visual Question Answering (VQA) focuses on providing answers to natural language questions by utilizing information from images.<n>Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) leveraging external knowledge bases (KBs) emerges as a promising approach.<n>This study presents two key innovations. First, we introduce fine-grained knowledge units that consist of multimodal data fragments.<n>Second, we propose a knowledge unit retrieval-augmented generation framework (KU-RAG) that seamlessly integrates fine-grained retrieval with MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T11:25:38Z)
• Self-Bootstrapped Visual-Language Model for Knowledge Selection and Question Answering [11.183845003492964]
  We use Passage Retrieval (DPR) to retrieve related knowledge to help the model answer questions. DPR conduct retrieving in natural language space, which may not ensure comprehensive acquisition of image information. We propose a novel framework that leverages the visual-language model to select the key knowledge retrieved by DPR and answer questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T07:44:20Z)
• Merging Generated and Retrieved Knowledge for Open-Domain QA [72.42262579925911]
  COMBO is a compatibility-Oriented knowledge Merging for Better Open-domain QA framework. We show that COMBO outperforms competitive baselines on three out of four tested open-domain QA benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T19:37:06Z)
• Decker: Double Check with Heterogeneous Knowledge for Commonsense Fact Verification [80.31112722910787]
  We propose Decker, a commonsense fact verification model that is capable of bridging heterogeneous knowledge. Experimental results on two commonsense fact verification benchmark datasets, CSQA2.0 and CREAK demonstrate the effectiveness of our Decker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T06:28:16Z)
• Incremental Knowledge Based Question Answering [52.041815783025186]
  We propose a new incremental KBQA learning framework that can progressively expand learning capacity as humans do. Specifically, it comprises a margin-distilled loss and a collaborative selection method, to overcome the catastrophic forgetting problem. The comprehensive experiments demonstrate its effectiveness and efficiency when working with the evolving knowledge base.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T09:03:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.