An Empirical Study for Android-to-OpenHarmony GUI Test Migration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11245v2
• Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 06:46:25 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Study for Android-to-OpenHarmony GUI Test Migration
• Abstract summary: We present the first systematic empirical study of test migration from Android to OpenHarmony.<n>We select two state-of-the-art test migration approaches (i.e., ReSPlay and ITeM) and adapt these two approaches to enable their execution on OpenHarmony.<n>Our results reveal that existing test migration approaches are less effective (15% success-rate on ReSPlay and 26% success-rate on ITeM) in Android-to-OpenHarmony scenarios.
• Score: 23.265004202792724
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: To reduce the substantial engineering effort required to test the corresponding applications from Android to OpenHarmony, migrating existing GUI test cases has become a critical problem. However, current research neither proposes solutions tailored for OpenHarmony nor provides a systematic evaluation of migration approaches on this system, leaving developers with limited empirical guidance in practice. In this paper, we present the first systematic empirical study of test migration from Android to OpenHarmony. Specifically, we first construct a dataset referred to as the ATH Benchmark, comprising 36 commercial applications with an average of over 9 billion downloads, along with 108 manually designed test cases. Second, we select two state-of-the-art test migration approaches (i.e., ReSPlay and ITeM) and adapt these two approaches to enable their execution on OpenHarmony. Third, we use the preceding infrastructure to evaluate these two approaches from three perspectives, including testing performance, root causes of failures, and the impact of OpenHarmony characteristics. Our results reveal that existing test migration approaches are less effective (15% success-rate on ReSPlay and 26% success-rate on ITeM) in Android-to-OpenHarmony scenarios. Through an in-depth analysis of failed cases, we identify that test performance is primarily hindered by OpenHarmony-specific characteristics, including technical architecture differences and unique ecosystem traits. Utilizing these findings, we propose an enhanced approach based on ITeM, referred as ITeM-HM, which incorporates specific OpenHarmony system features. As a result, ITeM-HM successfully achieves a 214% success-rate relative improvement over the original ITeM (from 26% to 81%).

Related papers

• Rewarding the Scientific Process: Process-Level Reward Modeling for Agentic Data Analysis [68.28714988482703]
  Process Reward Models (PRMs) have achieved remarkable success in augmenting the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We present a study revealing that general-domain PRMs struggle to supervise data analysis agents.<n>We introduce DataPRM, a novel environment-aware generative process reward model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T09:00:30Z)
• PRIME: A Process-Outcome Alignment Benchmark for Verifiable Reasoning in Mathematics and Engineering [71.15346406323827]
  We introduce PRIME, a benchmark for evaluating verifiers on Process-Outcome Alignment verification.<n>We find that current verifiers frequently fail to detect derivation flaws.<n>We propose a process-aware RLVR training paradigm utilizing verifiers selected via PRIME.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T04:45:01Z)
• DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems [48.971606069204825]
  DoVer is an intervention-driven debug framework for large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems.<n>It augments hypothesis generation with active verification through targeted interventions.<n>DoVer flips 18-28% of failed trials into successes, achieves up to 16% milestone progress, and validates or refutes 30-60% of failure hypotheses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T09:23:48Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Benchmarks and Solutions in Software Engineering of LLM-Empowered Agentic System [56.40989626804489]
  This survey provides the first holistic analysis of Large Language Models-powered software engineering.<n>We review over 150 recent papers and propose a taxonomy along two key dimensions: (1) Solutions, categorized into prompt-based, fine-tuning-based, and agent-based paradigms, and (2) Benchmarks, including tasks such as code generation, translation, and repair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T06:56:50Z)
• An Empirical Study on Failures in Automated Issue Solving [12.571536148821144]
  We analyze the performance and efficiency of three SOTA tools, spanning both pipeline-based and agentic architectures, in automated issue solving tasks of SWE-Bench-Verified.<n>To move from high-level performance metrics to underlying cause analysis, we conducted a systematic manual analysis of 150 failed instances.<n>The results reveal distinct failure fingerprints between the two architectural paradigms, with the majority of agentic failures stemming from flawed reasoning and cognitive deadlocks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T13:07:52Z)
• VeriMinder: Mitigating Analytical Vulnerabilities in NL2SQL [11.830097026198308]
  Application systems using natural language interfaces to databases (NLIDBs) have democratized data analysis.<n>This has also brought forth an urgent challenge to help users who might use these systems without a background in statistical analysis.<n>We present VeriMinder, https://veriminder.ai, an interactive system for detecting and mitigating such analytical vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T19:48:12Z)
• Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail? [87.90075668488434]
  We introduce MAST-Data, a comprehensive dataset of 1600+ annotated traces collected across 7 popular MAS frameworks.<n>We build the first Multi-Agent System Failure taxonomy (MAST)<n>We leverage MAST and MAST-Data to analyze failure patterns across models (GPT4, Claude 3, Qwen2.5, CodeLlama) and tasks (coding, math, general agent)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T19:04:38Z)
• Navigating the Maze of Explainable AI: A Systematic Approach to Evaluating Methods and Metrics [10.045644410833402]
  We introduce LATEC, a large-scale benchmark that critically evaluates 17 prominent XAI methods using 20 distinct metrics.<n>We showcase the high risk of conflicting metrics leading to unreliable rankings and consequently propose a more robust evaluation scheme.<n>LATEC reinforces its role in future XAI research by publicly releasing all 326k saliency maps and 378k metric scores as a (meta-evaluation) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T09:07:46Z)
• CHASE: A Causal Hypergraph based Framework for Root Cause Analysis in Multimodal Microservice Systems [29.424326542377386]
  We propose a Causal Heterogeneous grAph baSed framEwork for root cause analysis, namely CHASE, for microservice systems with multimodal data.<n> CHASE learns from the constructed hypergraph with hyperedges representing the flow of causality and performs root cause localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T07:46:51Z)
• A Unified Approach Towards Active Learning and Out-of-Distribution Detection [49.334006405481375]
  We introduce SISOM as the first unified solution for both AL and OOD detection.<n>By leveraging feature space distance metrics SISOM combines the strengths of the currently independent tasks to solve both effectively.<n>In AL, SISOM outperforms others and delivers top-1 performance in three benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-18T17:02:57Z)
• Look, Listen, and Answer: Overcoming Biases for Audio-Visual Question Answering [25.577314828249897]
  We propose a novel dataset, MUSIC-AVQA-R, crafted in two steps: rephrasing questions within the test split of a public dataset (MUSIC-AVQA) and introducing distribution shifts to split questions.<n> Experimental results show that this architecture achieves state-of-the-art performance on MUSIC-AVQA-R, notably obtaining a significant improvement of 9.32%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T09:16:02Z)
• FairMOT: On the Fairness of Detection and Re-Identification in Multiple Object Tracking [92.48078680697311]
  Multi-object tracking (MOT) is an important problem in computer vision. We present a simple yet effective approach termed as FairMOT based on the anchor-free object detection architecture CenterNet. The approach achieves high accuracy for both detection and tracking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-04T08:18:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.