Cross-Architecture LLM Ensembles, Feature-Based Reranking and Retrieval-Augmented Prompting for Legal Information Processing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11400v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 11:07:57 GMT
• Title: Cross-Architecture LLM Ensembles, Feature-Based Reranking and Retrieval-Augmented Prompting for Legal Information Processing
• Abstract summary: We report Team DU's participation in all five tasks of COLIEE 2026.<n>We use open-weight systems for legal case retrieval, case entailment, statute retrieval and entailment, and legal judgment prediction.
• Score: 7.028604573959654
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Legal information processing spans retrieval, entailment and judgment prediction problems, requiring text matching, reasoning and robust generalisation with limited supervision. We report Team DU's participation in all five tasks of COLIEE 2026, using open-weight systems for legal case retrieval, case entailment, statute retrieval and entailment, and legal judgment prediction. For Tasks 3 and 4, all models predate the 15 July 2025 cutoff required by the rules. For Task 4 (statute entailment), a cross-architecture ensemble of nine models from three families achieves 96.3% accuracy, placing first among 33 submissions from 11 teams. For the Pilot Task (tort prediction and rationale extraction), a multi-view system combining five claim-level models and refining the verdict using features derived from the claim predictions achieves 73.1% TP accuracy and 68.2% RE F1 as an unofficial submission, scoring above all official entries on TP and matching the highest on RE. For Task 2 (legal case entailment), changing only the prompt from single- to multi-selection raises F1 from 0.343 to 0.555 in post-competition evaluation on released gold labels, exceeding the best official submission (F1 = 0.490). For Task 3 (statute retrieval and entailment), replacing the entailment model with Qwen3-235B and a structured legal reasoning prompt raises accuracy from 79.3% to 91.5% in post-competition analysis. For Task 1 (legal case retrieval), a learning-to-rank system combining lexical and semantic retrieval with structural, citation authority, and temporal features (34 in total) achieves F1 = 0.314 (rank 11 of 54 submissions from 22 teams). Overall, legal information processing benefits from different inductive biases across tasks, with cross-architecture ensembling, feature-based reranking and retrieval-augmented prompting each proving most effective in different settings.

Related papers

• How AI Models Manage Epistemic Authority: A Taxonomy and Comparative Analysis of Responses to User Disagreement [0.573978744524696]
  We study how a model manages its authority, referring here to its claim to knowledge, competence, or the right to advise, once a user challenges its answer.<n>We construct a new dataset of 2,310 controlled challenge scenarios and 32,340 corresponding responses from 14 models.<n>We find that models show conflicting behaviour: they validate users in 85% of responses but maintain their original claim in 65%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T15:47:29Z)
• NOWJ@COLIEE 2026: Adaptive Pipelines for Legal Retrieval and Reasoning [1.2884266282263097]
  This paper presents the methodologies and results of the NOWJ team's participation across all five tasks of the COLIEE 2026 competition.<n>For Task 1 (Legal Case Retrieval), we propose a four-stage candidate filtering, dense retrieval with complementary embedding models, cross-encoder reranking via fine-tuned generative rerankers.<n>For Task 2 (Legal Case Entailment), we combine BM25-based reranking, attention-based reranking, and consensus ensemble verification.<n>For Task 3 (Statute Law Retrieval and Entailment), we adopt a retrieval-aug
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-18T02:46:06Z)
• ttda704 at SemEval-2026 Task 6: Structured Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Political Evasion Detection [0.006227637802384129]
  This paper describes our system for SemEval-2026 Task 6, which addresses the classification of political evasion strategies in English question-answer pairs extracted from U.S. presidential interviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-14T12:09:23Z)
• Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark [63.143852586221534]
  We introduce KINA, an 899-item benchmark across 261 fine-grained disciplines.<n>We prove a bonus-on-bar tournament weakly FOSD-dominates flat payment in released-review quality.<n>The top model, Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview, reaches 53.17%, followed by Claude-Opus-4.6 at 49.92% and GPT-5.4 at 48.55%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T17:06:49Z)
• Large Language Model-Powered Query-Driven Event Timeline Summarization in Industrial Search [49.02761046363752]
  We present QDET (Query-Driven Event Timeline Summarization), a production system deployed on Baidu Search.<n>QDET identifies and organizes sub-events closely relevant to the query from noisy candidate sets formed by millions of documents retrieved daily.<n>Online A/B tests on Baidu Search validate real-world effectiveness, showing 5.5% CTR improvement, 4.6% longer dwell time, and 4.4% deeper exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T14:16:27Z)
• ScientistOne: Towards Human-Level Autonomous Research via Chain-of-Evidence [57.37494162084001]
  Chain-of-Evidence (CoE) is a verifiability framework requiring every claim to be traceable to its evidence source.<n>CoE Audit is a post-hoc audit whose four integrity checks -- score verification, specification violation, reference verification, and method-code alignment -- apply uniformly to all systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T21:30:27Z)
• Step-wise Rubric Rewards for LLM Reasoning [72.17879367869503]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is widely used to improve reasoning in large language models.<n>We find 18.2% of steps in correct responses are wrong yet positively rewarded.<n>Across six mathematical reasoning benchmarks, SRaR improves average accuracy over RaR by 3.57 points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T07:08:14Z)
• SPECA: Specification-to-Checklist Agentic Auditing for Multi-Implementation Systems -- A Case Study on Ethereum Clients [1.711666249985278]
  SPECA is a Specification-to-Checklist framework that turns normative requirements into checklists.<n>We instantiate SPECA in an in-the-wild security audit contest for the Fusaka upgrade, covering 11 production clients.<n>Our improved agent, evaluated against the ground truth of a competitive audit, achieved a strict recall of 27.3 percent on high-impact vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T12:19:00Z)
• SLEAN: Simple Lightweight Ensemble Analysis Network for Multi-Provider LLM Coordination: Design, Implementation, and Vibe Coding Bug Investigation Case Study [0.0]
  SLEAN operates as a simple prompt bridge between LLMs using.txt templates, requiring no deep technical knowledge for deployment.<n>The three-phase protocol formed by independent analysis, cross-critique, and arbitration, filters harmful AI-generated code suggestions.<n>The file-driven, provider-agnostic architecture enables deployment without specialized coding expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T04:24:04Z)
• Eigen-1: Adaptive Multi-Agent Refinement with Monitor-Based RAG for Scientific Reasoning [53.45095336430027]
  We develop a unified framework that combines implicit retrieval and structured collaboration.<n>On Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Bio/Chem Gold, our framework achieves 48.3% accuracy.<n>Results on SuperGPQA and TRQA confirm robustness across domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T14:05:55Z)
• Classification or Prompting: A Case Study on Legal Requirements Traceability [4.629156733452248]
  Legal requirements traceability is a key task where engineers must analyze technical requirements against target artifacts.<n>In this paper, we investigate two automated solutions based on language models, including large ones (LLMs)<n>The first solution, Kashif, is a classifier that leverages sentence transformers and semantic similarity.<n>The second solution, RICE_LRT, prompts a recent generative LLM based on RICE, a prompt engineering framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T13:33:40Z)
• A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challenges [73.34944216896837]
  Legal judgment prediction (LJP) applies Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to predict judgment results based on fact descriptions automatically. We analyze 31 LJP datasets in 6 languages, present their construction process and define a classification method of LJP. We show the state-of-art results for 8 representative datasets from different court cases and discuss the open challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T04:06:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.