JobHop v2: A Large-Scale Career Trajectory Dataset from Unstructured Resumes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11715v2
• Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:13:31 GMT
• Title: JobHop v2: A Large-Scale Career Trajectory Dataset from Unstructured Resumes
• Abstract summary: JobHopv2 is an improved version of the publicly available JobHop dataset constructed through end-to-end large language model (LLM) extraction.<n>The dataset comprises $355,315$ career trajectories annotated with ESCO occupational codes, quarter-level temporal information, and normalized five-level education attainment.
• Score: 44.09276843323847
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large-scale, richly annotated career trajectory data underpins workforce planning, job recommendation, and labour market analysis, yet publicly available datasets are either small, closed to independent use, or built from pre-standardized occupational codes with LLM-synthesized rather than authentic free text. We present JobHop~v2, an improved version of the publicly available JobHop dataset, constructed through end-to-end large language model (LLM) extraction from a corpus of ${\sim}440{,}000$ pseudonymized, multilingual resumes provided by VDAB, the Flemish Public Employment Service. The released dataset comprises $355{,}315$ career trajectories annotated with ESCO occupational codes, quarter-level temporal information, and normalized five-level education attainment, broadening both the coverage and the annotation richness of the original release. Relative to v1, JobHop~v2 introduces a redesigned extraction pipeline based on reasoning-controlled LLM inference with a retry mechanism (achieving a 100% JSON parse rate), a richer extraction schema, and a revised evaluation protocol scored against three complementary annotation baselines. Evaluated against these baselines, our best extractor comes closest to the inter-annotator agreement ceiling among all compared models, trailing it by only 1.1-2.7 percentage points. The dataset and code are publicly released to support reproducible career-trajectory research.

Related papers

• Cross-modal Retrieval Models for Stripped Binary Analysis [62.89251403093734]
  BinSeek is the first two-stage cross-modal retrieval framework for stripped binary code analysis.<n>It consists of two models: BinSeekEmbedding is trained on large-scale dataset to learn the semantic relevance of the binary code.<n>BinSeek-Reranker learns to carefully judge the relevance of the candidate code to the description with context augmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T07:58:10Z)
• AgentExpt: Automating AI Experiment Design with LLM-based Resource Retrieval Agent [36.65355075707938]
  One key application in AI research is to automate experiment design through agentic and baseline retrieval.<n>We present a comprehensive framework for baseline and dataset recommendation.<n>We develop a reasoning-augmented reranker that exact interaction chains to construct explicit reasoning chains and finetunes a large language model to produce interpretable justifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T01:51:56Z)
• JobHop: A Large-Scale Dataset of Career Trajectories [43.84577100931558]
  JobHop is a large-scale public dataset derived from anonymized resumes provided by VDAB, the public employment service in Flanders, Belgium.<n>We process unstructured resume data to extract structured career information, which is normalized to standardized ESCO occupation codes.<n>This results in a rich dataset of over 1.67 million work experiences, extracted from and grouped into more than 361,000 user resumes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T15:22:29Z)
• A Benchmark for End-to-End Zero-Shot Biomedical Relation Extraction with LLMs: Experiments with OpenAI Models [8.888403936226185]
  We study patterns in the performance of OpenAI LLMs across a diverse sampling of biomedical relation extraction tasks.<n>Our work is the first to study and compare the performance of the GPT-4, o1 and GPT-OSS for the end-to-end zero-shot biomedical RE task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T07:08:54Z)
• Enhancing Talent Employment Insights Through Feature Extraction with LLM Finetuning [0.0]
  We develop a robust pipeline to identify variables such as remote work availability, remuneration structures, educational requirements, and work experience preferences.<n>Our methodology combines semantic chunking, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and fine-tuning DistilBERT models to overcome the limitations of traditional parsing tools.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation of our fine-tuned models and analyze their strengths, limitations, and potential for scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T19:49:49Z)
• KARRIEREWEGE: A Large Scale Career Path Prediction Dataset [29.24421465266904]
  We introduce KARRIEREWEGE, a comprehensive, publicly available dataset containing over 500k career paths.<n>To tackle the problem of free-text inputs typically found in resumes, we enhance it by synthesizing job titles and descriptions.<n>This allows for accurate predictions from unstructured data, closely aligning with real-world application challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T08:02:08Z)
• Leveraging Foundation Language Models (FLMs) for Automated Cohort Extraction from Large EHR Databases [50.552056536968166]
  We propose and evaluate an algorithm for automating column matching on two large, popular and publicly-accessible EHR databases.<n>Our approach achieves a high top-three accuracy of $92%$, correctly matching $12$ out of the $13$ columns of interest, when using a small, pre-trained general purpose language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T06:19:35Z)
• A Bayesian Approach to Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Authorship Attribution [57.309390098903]
  Authorship attribution aims to identify the origin or author of a document. Large Language Models (LLMs) with their deep reasoning capabilities and ability to maintain long-range textual associations offer a promising alternative. Our results on the IMDb and blog datasets show an impressive 85% accuracy in one-shot authorship classification across ten authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T04:14:23Z)
• AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotators [98.11286353828525]
  GPT-3.5 series models have demonstrated remarkable few-shot and zero-shot ability across various NLP tasks. We propose AnnoLLM, which adopts a two-step approach, explain-then-annotate. We build the first conversation-based information retrieval dataset employing AnnoLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T17:03:21Z)
• Summary-Source Proposition-level Alignment: Task, Datasets and Supervised Baseline [94.0601799665342]
  Aligning sentences in a reference summary with their counterparts in source documents was shown as a useful auxiliary summarization task. We propose establishing summary-source alignment as an explicit task, while introducing two major novelties. We create a novel training dataset for proposition-level alignment, derived automatically from available summarization evaluation data. We present a supervised proposition alignment baseline model, showing improved alignment-quality over the unsupervised approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T17:27:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.