MET: Theory-Grounded and Culture-Aware Multilingual Moral Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11736v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:59:25 GMT
• Title: MET: Theory-Grounded and Culture-Aware Multilingual Moral Reasoning
• Abstract summary: We introduce MCLASH, a multilingual moral decision-making benchmark to capture culturally situated moral intuitions and social norms across languages.<n>Second, we propose MET (Multilingual Ethics with Theory-grounded reasoning), a two-step prompting method built on expert-curated, theory-based grounds.<n>Third, we introduce MET-D (MET-Distillation), which enhances the second step through a self-distillation training stage that requires no external supervision.
• Score: 9.704767095270453
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Language models are increasingly used for moral decision-making across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts, yet existing work overlooks multilinguality on three aspects: 1) multilingual evaluation benchmarks use direct translation, failing to adapt culture-specific items; 2) inference-time methods for moral reasoning rely on static, English-centric scaffolds and lack grounding in moral theory; 3) training methods for moral decision-making typically require expensive supervision from stronger models or human annotators. We address these gaps with three contributions. First, we introduce MCLASH, a multilingual moral decision-making benchmark to capture culturally situated moral intuitions and social norms across languages. Second, we propose MET (Multilingual Ethics with Theory-grounded reasoning), a two-step prompting method built on expert-curated, theory-based grounds drawn from psychology and philosophy: the model first selects situation- and culture-specific grounds, then reasons over them in the native language of the user. Third, we introduce MET-D (MET-Distillation), which enhances the second step through a self-distillation training stage that requires no external supervision. MET-D improves macro-F1 over the base model on all three models of different sizes and families (Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-8B, Gemma3-4B), by an average of 3.71 points on MCLASH and 4.23 on MMoralExceptQA, with a peak MCLASH gain of 12.94 points for Malay on Qwen3-8B. We further reveal that MET-D increases native-language reasoning by 62.13 points on average, and that beneficial grounds differ systematically across cultures. Together, these contributions open the path for culture-aligned, theory-grounded multilingual moral reasoning.

Related papers

• CultureForest: Understanding and Evaluating Cultural Norm Grounded Reasoning in LLMs [59.09971492475217]
  We introduce CultureForest, a benchmark for textitCultural Norm Grounded Reasoning<n>CultureForest comprises 5,378 examples across 8 domains and 53 countries/regions.<n>Extensive experiments reveal that even top-tier models degrade substantially in open-ended settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T08:25:12Z)
• Untangling Input Language from Reasoning Language: A Diagnostic Framework for Cross-Lingual Moral Alignment in LLMs [10.386888517619997]
  Two factors could drive such differences: the language of the dilemma itself, or the language in which the model reasons.<n>Standard evaluation conflates these by testing only matched conditions.<n>We introduce a methodology that separately manipulates each factor, covering also mismatched conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T10:26:29Z)
• CRaFT: An Explanation-Based Framework for Evaluating Cultural Reasoning in Multilingual Language Models [0.42970700836450487]
  We introduce CRaFT, an explanation-based multilingual evaluation framework designed to assess how large language models (LLMs) reason across cultural contexts.<n>We apply the framework to 50 culturally grounded questions from the World Values Survey, translated into Arabic, Bengali, and Spanish, and evaluate three models (GPT, DeepSeek, and FANAR) across over 2,100 answer-explanation pairs.<n>Results reveal significant cross-lingual variation in reasoning: Arabic reduces fluency, Bengali enhances it, and Spanish remains largely stable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T18:49:10Z)
• I Am Aligned, But With Whom? MENA Values Benchmark for Evaluating Cultural Alignment and Multilingual Bias in LLMs [5.060243371992739]
  We introduce MENAValues, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the cultural alignment and multilingual biases of large language models (LLMs)<n> Drawing from large-scale, authoritative human surveys, we curate a structured dataset that captures the sociocultural landscape of MENA with population-level response distributions from 16 countries.<n>Our analysis reveals three critical phenomena: "Cross-Lingual Value Shifts" where identical questions yield drastically different responses based on language, "Reasoning-Induced Degradation" where prompting models to explain their reasoning worsens cultural alignment, and "Logit Leakage" where models refuse sensitive questions while internal probabilities reveal strong hidden
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T05:10:57Z)
• MMA-ASIA: A Multilingual and Multimodal Alignment Framework for Culturally-Grounded Evaluation [91.22008265721952]
  MMA-ASIA centers on a human-curated, multilingual, and multimodally aligned benchmark covering 8 Asian countries and 10 languages.<n>This is the first dataset aligned at the input level across three modalities: text, image (visual question answering), and speech.<n>We propose a five-dimensional evaluation protocol that measures: (i) cultural-awareness disparities across countries, (ii) cross-lingual consistency, (iii) cross-modal consistency, (iv) cultural knowledge generalization, and (v) grounding validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T14:12:12Z)
• One Model, Many Morals: Uncovering Cross-Linguistic Misalignments in Computational Moral Reasoning [23.56514813420256]
  We investigate how language mediates moral decision-making in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our analysis reveals significant inconsistencies in LLMs' moral judgments across languages, often reflecting cultural misalignment.<n>We distill our insights into a structured typology of moral reasoning errors that calls for more culturally-aware AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T19:14:17Z)
• MultiNRC: A Challenging and Native Multilingual Reasoning Evaluation Benchmark for LLMs [56.87573414161703]
  We introduce the Multilingual Native Reasoning Challenge (MultiNRC), a benchmark to assess Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>MultiNRC covers four core reasoning categories: language-specific linguistic reasoning, wordplay & riddles, cultural/tradition reasoning, and math reasoning with cultural relevance.<n>For cultural/tradition reasoning and math reasoning with cultural relevance, we also provide English equivalent translations of the multilingual questions by manual translation from native speakers fluent in English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T12:56:31Z)
• Whose Morality Do They Speak? Unraveling Cultural Bias in Multilingual Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have become integral tools in diverse domains, yet their moral reasoning capabilities remain underexplored.<n>This study investigates whether multilingual LLMs, such as GPT-3.5-Turbo, reflect culturally specific moral values or impose dominant moral norms.<n>Using the updated Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ-2) in eight languages, the study analyzes the models' adherence to six core moral foundations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-25T10:17:15Z)
• Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in Large Language Models [89.94270049334479]
  This paper identifies a cultural dominance issue within large language models (LLMs) LLMs often provide inappropriate English-culture-related answers that are not relevant to the expected culture when users ask in non-English languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T05:38:23Z)
• Speaking Multiple Languages Affects the Moral Bias of Language Models [70.94372902010232]
  Pre-trained multilingual language models (PMLMs) are commonly used when dealing with data from multiple languages and cross-lingual transfer. Do the models capture moral norms from English and impose them on other languages? Our experiments demonstrate that, indeed, PMLMs encode differing moral biases, but these do not necessarily correspond to cultural differences or commonalities in human opinions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T20:08:54Z)
• Do Multilingual Language Models Capture Differing Moral Norms? [71.52261949766101]
  Massively multilingual sentence representations are trained on large corpora of uncurated data. This may cause the models to grasp cultural values including moral judgments from the high-resource languages. The lack of data in certain languages can also lead to developing random and thus potentially harmful beliefs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-18T12:26:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.