Beyond the Single Camera: Agentic Multi-View Reasoning in Sports Video Understanding
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11844v1
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:34:36 GMT
- Title: Beyond the Single Camera: Agentic Multi-View Reasoning in Sports Video Understanding
- Abstract summary: We introduce SportMV-Bench, a benchmark for multi-view sports video understanding.<n>Our analysis shows that current MLLMs fail to effectively exploit multi-view information.<n>We propose SportMV-Agent, an agentic framework that orchestrates an iterative loop of active view selection, perception tool execution, and evidence-grounded reasoning.
- Score: 21.581174236498196
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on single-view video understanding benchmarks. However, sports videos involve dense occlusion, rapid motion, and complex interactions that are difficult to resolve from a single viewpoint. In practice, sports events are recorded from multiple camera angles, providing complementary evidence used by referees. Yet, no existing benchmark evaluates MLLMs on multi-view sports video understanding. To address this gap, we introduce SportMV-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark built from official match recordings, through a dedicated pipeline combining LLM-based generation, MLLM-based verification, and human filtering to ensure quality and consistency. SportMV-Bench containing 787 multi-view video bundles and 2592 question-answer pairs across three categories: Perception-Aware Recognition (PAR), Rule-aware Event Interpretation (REI), and Adjudicative Decision Reasoning(ADR). Our analysis shows that current MLLMs fail to effectively exploit multi-view information, with the bottlenecks lying in fine-grained visual perception and view selection rather than logical reasoning or domain knowledge. We propose SportMV-Agent, an agentic framework that orchestrates an iterative loop of active view selection, perception tool execution, and evidence-grounded reasoning, achieving a significant 14.46% relative improvement over the strongest MLLM baseline.
Related papers
- Benchmarking Visual State Tracking in Multimodal Video Understanding [67.73383974166462]
We introduce Visual STAte Tracking benchmark (VSTAT) to diagnose visual state tracking in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>VSTAT consists of 834 clips drawn from both synthetic and real-world videos, paired with 1,500 questions that cannot be answered from any single frame or short segment.<n>We find that MLLMs reason and track correctly in text, but fail at visually perceiving the events they need to track.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T17:12:05Z) - A Skill-augmented Agentic Framework and Benchmark for Multi-Video Understanding [69.31609753061137]
Multimodal Large Language Models have achieved strong performance in single-video understanding, yet their ability to reason across multiple videos remains limited.<n>Existing approaches typicallyulate multiple videos into a single input and performulate direct inference, which introduces training-inference mismatch.<n>Current multi-video benchmarks primarily emphasize event-level comparison, leaving identity-level matching, fine-grained discrimination, and structured multi-step reasoning underexplored.<n>We propose SAMA, a Skill-Augmented Agentic Framework for Multi-Video Understanding, which integrates visual tools, task-specific skills, and a conflict-aware verification mechanism
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-16T02:09:48Z) - SportR: A Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoning in Sports [21.410115837645318]
SportR is the first multi-sports large-scale benchmark designed to train and evaluate MLLMs on the fundamental reasoning required for sports intelligence.<n>Our benchmark provides a dataset of 5,017 images and 2,101 videos.<n>For the most advanced tasks requiring multi-step reasoning, such as determining penalties or explaining tactics, we provide 7,118 high-quality, human-authored Chain of Thought annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-09T18:55:20Z) - An Empirical Study for Representations of Videos in Video Question Answering via MLLMs [4.726627693005334]
Multimodal large language models have recently achieved remarkable progress in video question answering.<n>It remains unclear which video representations are most effective for MLLMs, and how different modalities balance task accuracy against computational efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-14T09:02:22Z) - A Survey on Video Temporal Grounding with Multimodal Large Language Model [107.24431595873808]
Recent advancement in temporal grounding (VTG) has significantly enhanced fine-grained video understanding.<n>With superior multimodal comprehension and reasoning abilities, VTG approaches based on MLLMs (VTG-MLLMs) are gradually surpassing traditional fine-tuned methods.<n>Despite extensive surveys on general video-language understanding, comprehensive reviews specifically addressing VTG-MLLMs remain scarce.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-07T08:52:11Z) - Enhancing Sports Strategy with Video Analytics and Data Mining: Assessing the effectiveness of Multimodal LLMs in tennis video analysis [0.0]
We aim to assess the effectiveness of MLLMs in analysing sports videos, focusing mainly on tennis videos.<n>Despite research done on tennis analysis, there remains a gap in models that are able to understand and identify the sequence of events in a tennis rally.<n>We will mainly assess the MLLMs on their ability to fill this gap - to classify tennis actions, as well as their ability to identify these actions in a sequence of tennis actions in a rally.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-24T06:08:35Z) - Perception-R1: Advancing Multimodal Reasoning Capabilities of MLLMs via Visual Perception Reward [77.34936657745578]
We propose Perception-R1, which introduces a novel visual perception reward that explicitly encourages MLLMs to perceive the visual content accurately.<n>We show that Perception-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance on most benchmarks using only 1,442 training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-08T16:48:42Z) - MAGNET: A Multi-agent Framework for Finding Audio-Visual Needles by Reasoning over Multi-Video Haystacks [67.31276358668424]
We introduce a novel task named AV-HaystacksQA, where the goal is to identify salient segments across different videos in response to a query and link them together to generate the most informative answer.<n> AVHaystacks is an audio-visual benchmark comprising 3100 annotated QA pairs designed to assess the capabilities of LMMs in multi-video retrieval and temporal grounding task.<n>We propose a model-agnostic, multi-agent framework to address this challenge, achieving up to 89% and 65% relative improvements over baseline methods on BLEU@4 and GPT evaluation scores in QA task on our proposed AVHaystack
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-08T06:34:29Z) - Seeing from Another Perspective: Evaluating Multi-View Understanding in MLLMs [41.072699990427374]
Multi-view understanding is a fundamental challenge in Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to be used as embodied agents.<n>We propose All-Angles Bench, a benchmark of over 2,100 human carefully annotated multi-view question-answer pairs across 90 real-world scenes.<n>Our experiments, benchmark on 27 representative MLLMs including Gemini-2.0-Flash, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, and GPT-4o against human evaluators reveals a substantial performance gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T17:59:53Z) - VOILA: Evaluation of MLLMs For Perceptual Understanding and Analogical Reasoning [63.0285363282581]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a powerful tool for integrating visual and textual information.<n>We introduce VOILA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' perceptual understanding and abstract relational reasoning.<n>We reveal that current MLLMs struggle to comprehend inter-image relationships and exhibit limited capabilities in high-level relational reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T23:36:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.