MemOps: Benchmarking Lifecycle Memory Operations in Long-Horizon Conversations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12893v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:33:44 GMT
• Title: MemOps: Benchmarking Lifecycle Memory Operations in Long-Horizon Conversations
• Abstract summary: We introduce MemOps, a benchmark that reformulates conversational memory as a sequence of lifecycle operations.<n>MemOps represents each memory event with a structured trace specifying its trigger, target, scope, state transition, and supporting evidence.<n>Across long-context, retrieval-based, parametric and managed-memory systems, MemOps disentangles failure modes that final-answer accuracy alone conceals.
• Score: 50.24315431387575
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Long-term memory has become a foundational capability for LLM-based agents that accompany users across extended, multi-session interactions. Existing benchmarks, however, evaluate such memory almost exclusively through downstream question answering, scoring only the correctness of a final answer. This black-box formulation conflates the heterogeneous causes of memory failure, such as missing the introduction of a relevant fact, binding an operation to the wrong target, or relying on stale values after a correction. As a result, it can credit correct answers despite their reliance on inconsistent or unsafe memory states. In this paper, we argue that, in dynamic long-horizon interactions, memory is not a static collection of facts but a lifecycle of explicit operations, including remembering, forgetting, updating, reflecting, and their compositions. We introduce MemOps, a benchmark that reformulates conversational memory as a sequence of lifecycle operations and represents each memory event with a structured trace specifying its trigger, target, scope, state transition, and supporting evidence. A controllable generation pipeline embeds these operations into long, task-oriented conversations and produces gold operation traces together with six categories of operation-level probes, evaluated under both adjacent-evidence and long-context settings. Across long-context, retrieval-based, parametric and managed-memory systems, MemOps disentangles failure modes that final-answer accuracy alone conceals, revealing that current systems remain far from uniformly reliable. For instance, session-level retrieval outperforms turn-level retrieval, and long-context models remain notably weak at reconstructing ordered memory-state trajectories. These results move long-term memory evaluation from final-answer scoring toward interpretable, operation-level diagnosis.

Related papers

• MemPrism: Task-Conditioned Relational Memory Views for Long-Horizon Agents [14.296334759650918]
  Long-horizon agents rely on memory to reuse experiences, yet existing memory systems assume that evidence can be directly consumed through a fixed representation.<n>MemPrism is a task-conditioned relational memory framework that separates persistent experience storage from decision-time working memory.<n>MemPrism consistently improves the task performance, especially as trajectories become longer, while reducing memory token consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-07T03:13:43Z)
• MEMPROBE: Probing Long-Term Agent Memory via Hidden User-State Recovery [58.64329475683699]
  We argue that long-term memory should be evaluated as an auditable post-interaction artifact.<n>We instantiate this view in MEMPROBE, a benchmark in which a memory-equipped agent assists simulated users.<n>We find that successful assistance and recoverable memory behave as distinct capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T13:52:46Z)
• RaMem: Contextual Reinstatement for Long-term Agentic Memory [21.228780482661076]
  We propose Contextual Reinstatement for Agentic Memory (RaMem), a framework that turns retrieved memory fragments into contextually evidence.<n>RaMem operates through four coordinated stages: (i) evidence anchoring grounds each memory in its original episodic conditions, especially event time, mention time, session span, and participants; (ii) recall condition induction derives the evidence conditions implied by the query; (iii) validity-aware retrieval uses these conditions to prioritize context-compatible memories while retaining content-relevant candidates as fallback evidence; and (iv) context-preserved synthesis keeps the selected memories' structured context available to the generator
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T04:41:14Z)
• REAL: A Reasoning-Enhanced Graph Framework for Long-Term Memory Management of LLMs [17.526686616588794]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to interact with users over long time horizons.<n>LLMs cannot retain all past interactions, making long-term memory management essential for storing, updating, and retrieving historical information.<n> REAL constructs long-term conversational memory as a temporal and confidence-aware directed property graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T10:53:10Z)
• Memory is Reconstructed, Not Retrieved: Graph Memory for LLM Agents [51.30250860677378]
  We propose MRAgent, a framework that combines an associative memory graph with an active reconstruction mechanism.<n>Running on a Cue-Tag-Content graph, our active reconstruction mechanism integrates reasoning directly into memory access.<n>Experiments on the LoCoMo benchmark and LongMemEval benchmark demonstrate significant improvements over strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T11:29:46Z)
• Causal Intervention-Based Memory Selection for Long-Horizon LLM Agents [0.33842793760651557]
  We propose a causal memory-selection technique that estimates how candidate memories affect the model's answer under controlled interventions.<n>Results show that CMI achieves a stronger balance between answer quality and robustness to misleading memory, suggesting that reliable long-term memory requires selecting context based on causal usefulness rather than relevance alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T20:21:55Z)
• Is One Score Enough? Rethinking the Evaluation of Sequentially Evolving LLM Memory [50.857546269660276]
  We introduce SeqMem-Eval, a diagnostic evaluation framework for sequentially evolving large language models (LLMs) memory.<n>Rather than focusing only on final performance, SeqMem-Eval evaluates how memory states evolve, generalize, consolidate experience, and retain useful information during sequential inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T20:15:22Z)
• MemGround: Long-Term Memory Evaluation Kit for Large Language Models in Gamified Scenarios [33.8882826707344]
  MemGround is a rigorous long-term memory benchmark grounded in rich, gamified interactive scenarios.<n>To comprehensively quantify both memory utilization and behavioral trajectories, we propose a multi-dimensional metric suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T02:57:39Z)
• MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks [55.145729491377374]
  Existing evaluations of agents with memory typically assess memorization and action in isolation.<n>We introduce MemoryArena, a unified evaluation gym for benchmarking agent memory in multi-session Memory-Agent-Environment loops.<n> MemoryArena supports evaluation across web navigation, preference-constrained planning, progressive information search, and sequential formal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T09:49:14Z)
• AMA: Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration [54.490349689939166]
  We propose Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration (AMA), a novel framework that leverages coordinated agents to manage memory across multiple granularities.<n>AMA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines while reducing token consumption by approximately 80% compared to full-context methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T08:09:49Z)
• Mem2ActBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Long-Term Memory Utilization in Task-Oriented Autonomous Agents [20.357475946040054]
  We introduce textscMem2ActBench, a benchmark for evaluating whether agents can proactively leverage long-term memory to execute tool-based actions.<n>A reverse-generation method produces 400 tool-use tasks, with human evaluation confirming 91.3% are strongly memory-dependent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T06:22:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.