The Hitchhiker's Guide to Monoculture

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13077v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 21:01:06 GMT
• Title: The Hitchhiker's Guide to Monoculture
• Abstract summary: I examine code homogenization using Kaggle contest submissions from 2019 to mid-2026.<n>I first document widespread convergence toward the random seed value 42, consistent with LLMs.<n>I find little evidence of semantic homogenization, individually and collectively.
• Score: 0.7614628596146601
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often produce homogeneous outputs, raising concerns that AI coding assistants may lead to convergence in the software artifacts that developers create. Whether this occurs in practice is unclear because developers interactively prompt, evaluate, modify, and reject model outputs, and because outputs vary with prompt and repository context. I examine code homogenization using Kaggle contest submissions from 2019 to mid-2026. I first document widespread convergence toward the random seed value 42, consistent with LLMs reinforcing a longstanding convention in programming culture. I then study homogenization more broadly, at two levels of aggregation and abstraction. At the submission level, I measure the average pairwise similarity of submissions within contests. At the contest level, I measure the conceptual span of submitted code, motivating distinct measures for each: TF-IDF representations, which capture surface syntax, and Voyage 3 code embeddings, which capture code intent and semantics. The results demonstrate substantial syntactic homogenization at both the individual and collective levels: individual submissions have become more alike in literal syntax and code structure, while the latent dimensionality of syntactic variation has narrowed. In contrast, I find little evidence of semantic homogenization, individually and collectively. Average semantic distance remains essentially flat, and the contest-level latent dimensional span of semantic approaches remains stable, with evidence suggesting it has even expanded modestly. These findings suggest that AI coding assistants are certainly standardizing implementation details, yet they have not yet produced evidence of homogenization in the approaches and problem-solving strategies coders employ.

Related papers

• Where Does Generative Difficulty Reside? An Empirical Study of Target Representations [62.54876287800644]
  The target representation defines the distribution an image generator must learn, yet it is often treated as an interchangeable interface.<n>We study raw pixels, SD-VAE latents and DINOv2 as well as MAE representation-autoencoder features within a unified masked autoregressive rectified-flow model.<n>Our results show that compression, reconstruction fidelity, token dimensionality, and visible semantic clustering do not individually predict generative behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-01T12:32:31Z)
• CAPT: Confusion-Aware Prompt Tuning for Reducing Vision-Language Misalignment [15.634714514096487]
  Vision-language models like CLIP suffer from systematic misclassifications among visually and semantically similar categories.<n>We propose CAPT, a Confusion-Aware Prompt Tuning framework that enables models to learn from their own misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T03:20:23Z)
• Bidirectional Logits Tree: Pursuing Granularity Reconcilement in Fine-Grained Classification [89.20477310885731]
  This paper addresses the challenge of Granularity Competition in fine-grained classification tasks.<n>Existing approaches typically develop independent hierarchy-aware models based on shared features extracted from a common base encoder.<n>We propose a novel framework called the Bidirectional Logits Tree (BiLT) for Granularity Reconcilement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T10:42:19Z)
• Localizing Factual Inconsistencies in Attributable Text Generation [74.11403803488643]
  We introduce QASemConsistency, a new formalism for localizing factual inconsistencies in attributable text generation.<n>We show that QASemConsistency yields factual consistency scores that correlate well with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T22:53:48Z)
• Towards Unsupervised Recognition of Token-level Semantic Differences in Related Documents [61.63208012250885]
  We formulate recognizing semantic differences as a token-level regression task. We study three unsupervised approaches that rely on a masked language model. Our results show that an approach based on word alignment and sentence-level contrastive learning has a robust correlation to gold labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:58:04Z)
• Multifactor Sequential Disentanglement via Structured Koopman Autoencoders [2.7759072740347017]
  We consider multifactor disentanglement in which multiple semantic disentangled components are generated. Key to our approach is a strong inductive bias where we assume that the underlying dynamics can be represented linearly in the latent space. We propose a simple and easy to code new deep model that is fully unsupervised and it supports multifactor disentanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T10:01:58Z)
• Generate, Discriminate and Contrast: A Semi-Supervised Sentence Representation Learning Framework [68.04940365847543]
  We propose a semi-supervised sentence embedding framework, GenSE, that effectively leverages large-scale unlabeled data. Our method include three parts: 1) Generate: A generator/discriminator model is jointly trained to synthesize sentence pairs from open-domain unlabeled corpus; 2) Discriminate: Noisy sentence pairs are filtered out by the discriminator to acquire high-quality positive and negative sentence pairs; 3) Contrast: A prompt-based contrastive approach is presented for sentence representation learning with both annotated and synthesized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-30T10:15:21Z)
• Evaluation of Semantic Answer Similarity Metrics [0.0]
  We propose cross-encoder augmented bi-encoder and BERTScore models for semantic answer similarity, trained on a new dataset consisting of name pairs of US-American public figures. We provide the first dataset of co-referent name string pairs along with their similarities, which can be used for training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-25T14:40:36Z)
• Unsupervised Mismatch Localization in Cross-Modal Sequential Data [5.932046800902776]
  We develop an unsupervised learning algorithm that can infer the relationship between content-mismatched cross-modal data. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian deep learning model, named mismatch localization variational autoencoder (ML-VAE), that decomposes the generative process of the speech into hierarchically structured latent variables. Our experimental results show that ML-VAE successfully locates the mismatch between text and speech, without the need for human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T14:23:27Z)
• Contextualized Semantic Distance between Highly Overlapped Texts [85.1541170468617]
  Overlapping frequently occurs in paired texts in natural language processing tasks like text editing and semantic similarity evaluation. This paper aims to address the issue with a mask-and-predict strategy. We take the words in the longest common sequence as neighboring words and use masked language modeling (MLM) to predict the distributions on their positions. Experiments on Semantic Textual Similarity show NDD to be more sensitive to various semantic differences, especially on highly overlapped paired texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T03:59:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.