Beyond AI-Generated Labels: Watermarking, Co-Creation, and Conflation of AI-Generation with Disinformation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13082v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 08:44:12 GMT
• Title: Beyond AI-Generated Labels: Watermarking, Co-Creation, and Conflation of AI-Generation with Disinformation
• Abstract summary: We argue that extending watermark-based approaches to settings is conceptually and practically misguided.<n>We propose an alternative approach centered on process transparency and information literacy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Watermarking is often presented as a straightforward solution for distinguishing AI-generated from human-generated content, enabling platforms and regulators to trace synthetic content and detect AI-generated outputs at scale. This paper examines whether such mechanisms meaningfully address the epistemic and ethical challenges that arise in domains where the central concern is not the automation of content production, but the accuracy, intent, and deceptive potential of messages. We argue that extending watermark-based approaches to these settings is conceptually and practically misguided. Invisible watermarking encodes only model origin; when operationalized into visible AI-generated labels, it reduces complex creative processes to a misleading binary and provides no information about truthfulness. Such labels may stigmatize legitimate uses of generative tools while encouraging misplaced trust in unmarked content. Here we propose an alternative approach centered on process transparency and information literacy. We argue that these measures address the epistemic and ethical dimensions of AI-generated disinformation more effectively than visible watermark labels, reframing authorship as a transparent human practice rather than a binary indicator of machine involvement.

Related papers

• Watermarks Without Verification: AI Text Watermarking After the EU AI Act [49.51124343181601]
  Article 50 of the EU AI Act requires generative AI providers to mark the content their systems produce and ensure it can be detected as AI-generated.<n>Anthropic disclosed that every Claude model released after that date embeds a watermark based on SynthID-Text in all generated text, enabled by default with no user opt-out.<n>We argue that neither the objections nor the assurances can currently be verified and that this unverifiability, rather than watermarking itself, is the substantive governance failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T01:56:17Z)
• From Forensics to Ecosystems: Rethinking Watermarks for Generative AI Oversight [3.5885818925274715]
  We explore the challenges and opportunities of using digital watermarking for AI governance.<n>We propose reconceptualizing digital watermarks as tools for understanding the impacts of synthetic content on media ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-07T15:32:04Z)
• DAVID-XR1: Detecting AI-Generated Videos with Explainable Reasoning [58.70446237944036]
  DAVID-X is the first dataset to pair AI-generated videos with detailed defect-level, temporal-spatial annotations and written rationales.<n>We present DAVID-XR1, a video-language model designed to deliver an interpretable chain of visual reasoning.<n>Our results highlight the promise of explainable detection methods for trustworthy identification of AI-generated video content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T13:39:53Z)
• On-Device Watermarking: A Socio-Technical Imperative For Authenticity In The Age of Generative AI [0.0]
  We argue that we are adopting the wrong approach, and should instead focus on watermarking via cryptographic signatures.<n>For audio-visual content, in particular, all real content is grounded in the physical world and captured via hardware sensors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T20:36:52Z)
• SoK: Watermarking for AI-Generated Content [112.9218881276487]
  Watermarking schemes embed hidden signals within AI-generated content to enable reliable detection.<n>Watermarks can play a crucial role in enhancing AI safety and trustworthiness by combating misinformation and deception.<n>This work aims to guide researchers in advancing watermarking methods and applications, and support policymakers in addressing the broader implications of GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T16:22:33Z)
• Topic-Based Watermarks for Large Language Models [46.71493672772134]
  We propose a lightweight, topic-guided watermarking scheme for Large Language Model (LLM) output.<n>Our method achieves comparable perplexity to industry-leading systems, including Google's SynthID-Text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T17:49:40Z)
• Improving the Generation Quality of Watermarked Large Language Models via Word Importance Scoring [81.62249424226084]
  Token-level watermarking inserts watermarks in the generated texts by altering the token probability distributions. This watermarking algorithm alters the logits during generation, which can lead to a downgraded text quality. We propose to improve the quality of texts generated by a watermarked language model by Watermarking with Importance Scoring (WIS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T08:36:00Z)
• Evading Watermark based Detection of AI-Generated Content [45.47476727209842]
  A generative AI model can generate extremely realistic-looking content. Watermark has been leveraged to detect AI-generated content. A content is detected as AI-generated if a similar watermark can be decoded from it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T19:20:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.