Groc-PO: Grounded Context Preference Optimization for Truthful Multimodal LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13712v1
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:28:27 GMT
- Title: Groc-PO: Grounded Context Preference Optimization for Truthful Multimodal LLMs
- Abstract summary: Grounded Context Preference Optimization (Groc-PO) is a grounded preference optimization framework for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>By introducing more explicit preference supervision over multiple grounded stages, Groc-PO strengthens context-dependent reasoning and mitigates cross-stage error propagation.
- Score: 29.829143097768014
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Despite the rapid progress of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), they still suffer from untruthfulness issues, such as visual hallucinations, content fabrication, and unfaithful reasoning, which substantially undermine their faithfulness and practical utility. Alignment methods based on human preference, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), have been widely adopted to address these issues. However, multimodal reasoning errors often propagate across stages, and final-answer errors can often be traced to mistakes in early grounding stages, yet standard DPO typically applies preference optimization at the final-answer level. This credit-assignment challenge means that supervision for early grounding stages is indirect rather than stage-specific, making it difficult to suppress error propagation arising from grounding drift and context inconsistency. To address this, we propose Grounded Context Preference Optimization (Groc-PO), a grounded preference optimization framework for MLLMs. We further construct the Grounded Context Preference Dataset (GCPD), organizing multi-stage preference samples around three stages of Object Grounding, Contextual Grounding, and Grounded Reasoning, to capture the formation, integration, and utilization of grounded context. By introducing more explicit preference supervision over multiple grounded stages, Groc-PO strengthens context-dependent reasoning and mitigates cross-stage error propagation. Extensive experiments show that, compared with standard DPO and other strong baselines, Groc-PO achieves improved performance in hallucination mitigation, faithful reasoning, and overall reliability, supporting the value of more explicit grounded supervision for trustworthy multimodal reasoning.
Related papers
- Linguistic Relative Policy Optimization for Video Anomaly Reasoning [47.9421152257432]
We propose Linguistic Relative Policy Optimization (LRPO), which distills group-relative semantic advantages from multiple reasoning trajectories into a linguistically expressed anomaly experience prior.<n>Experiments on XD-Violence, UCF-Crime, and UBnormal demonstrate that LRPO significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods under tuning-free settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T09:07:04Z) - Hybrid Latent Reasoning with Decoupled Policy Optimization [19.348125016748018]
HyLaR (Hybrid Latent Reasoning) is a framework that seamlessly interleaves discrete text generation with continuous visual latent representations.<n>We show that HyLaR outperforms state-of-the-art latent reasoning approaches across fine-grained perception and general multimodal understanding benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-22T08:22:23Z) - Hit-RAG: Learning to Reason with Long Contexts via Preference Alignment [97.55382322103986]
Hit-RAG is a multi-stage preference alignment framework designed to resolve cognitive bottlenecks.<n>Our approach systematically refines the utilization of external evidence via three distinct stages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-07T04:05:27Z) - Multimodal Fact-Level Attribution for Verifiable Reasoning [80.60864342985748]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used for real-world tasks involving multi-step reasoning and long-form generation.<n>Existing multimodal grounding benchmarks and evaluation methods fail to assess attribution in complex multimodal reasoning.<n>We introduce MuRGAt, a benchmark for evaluating fact-level multimodal attribution in settings that require reasoning beyond direct observation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T03:10:02Z) - MAESTRO: Meta-learning Adaptive Estimation of Scalarization Trade-offs for Reward Optimization [56.074760766965085]
Group-Relative Policy Optimization has emerged as an efficient paradigm for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose MAESTRO, which treats reward scalarization as a dynamic latent policy, leveraging the model's terminal hidden states as a semantic bottleneck.<n>We formulate this as a contextual bandit problem within a bi-level optimization framework, where a lightweight Conductor network co-evolves with the policy by utilizing group-relative advantages as a meta-reward signal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T05:02:48Z) - DA-DPO: Cost-efficient Difficulty-aware Preference Optimization for Reducing MLLM Hallucinations [22.299736215070343]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) tend to overemphasize easily distinguishable preference pairs.<n>We propose Difficulty-Aware Direct Preference Optimization (DA-DPO), a cost-effective framework designed to balance the learning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-02T09:41:54Z) - Multimodal Large Language Models with Adaptive Preference Optimization for Sequential Recommendation [60.33386541343322]
We propose a Multimodal Large Language Models framework that integrates Hardness-aware and Noise-regularized preference optimization for Recommendation (HaNoRec)<n>Specifically, HaNoRec dynamically adjusts optimization weights based on both the estimated hardness of each training sample and the policy model's real-time responsiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-24T04:10:46Z) - Thinking on the Fly: Test-Time Reasoning Enhancement via Latent Thought Policy Optimization [5.674809920704963]
Latent Thought Policy Optimization enhances LLM reasoning entirely at test time.<n>Experiments show that LTPO not only matches or surpasses strong baselines on standard tasks but also demonstrates remarkable robustness where others fail.<n>Most notably, on highly challenging AIME benchmarks where existing latent reasoning baselines collapse to near-zero accuracy, LTPO delivers substantial improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-05T12:50:39Z) - Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [56.84730239046117]
We introduce a novel closed-form formulation for direct preference optimization using multiple reference models.
The resulting algorithm, Multi-Reference Preference Optimization (MRPO), leverages broader prior knowledge from diverse reference models.
Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs finetuned with MRPO generalize better in various preference data, regardless of data scarcity or abundance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-26T00:29:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.