A Multi-Model Hybrid Defense Approach Against White-box Adversarial Attacks in Computer Network Traffic

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17105v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 07:20:37 GMT
• Title: A Multi-Model Hybrid Defense Approach Against White-box Adversarial Attacks in Computer Network Traffic
• Abstract summary: Adversarial attacks aim to deceive NIDS by crafting and injecting adversarial examples into the system.<n>We developed a resilient hybrid defense mechanism aimed to mitigate the impact of two potent adversarial attacks.<n>Our proposed hybrid defense method effectively mitigated these adversarial threats, with post-defense accuracy of 96.57% and 89.20%.
• Score: 2.28438857884398
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: It is crucial to safeguard computer networks from evolving network security threats and unknown cyberattacks. An essential tool for protecting computer networks against unknown cyber threats is Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS). However, NIDS faces a major security concern due to its susceptibility to adversarial attacks. Adversarial attacks aim to deceive NIDS by crafting and injecting adversarial examples into the system. These adversarial inputs can deceive the NIDS into misclassifying benign network traffic as malicious. We developed a resilient hybrid defense mechanism aimed to mitigate the impact of two potent adversarial attacks: Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Carlini & Wagner (C&W) attack. Our hybrid defense approach leverages the combined strength of two heuristic defense methods: Adversarial Training (AT) and Gaussian Data Augmentation (GDA). GDA provides multi-directional defense, while AT enhances NIDS robustness against specific adversarial vectors. Under pre-attack scenarios, NIDS demonstrated good accuracy and f1-score. However, in the post-attack scenario, its accuracy significantly dropped under FGSM and C&W attacks (0.2649 and 0.4961, respectively). Our proposed hybrid defense method effectively mitigated these adversarial threats, with post-defense accuracy of 96.57% and 89.20% for FGSM and C&W attacks. We evaluated the defense strategy across a range of epsilon and confidence noise factor values (ranging from 0.0001 to 0.0009). This research provides a good direction for future researchers in the emerging area of adversarial machine learning from a security perspective.

Related papers

• A Defensive Framework Against Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning-Based Network Intrusion Detection Systems [3.155715652244226]
  Traditional signature-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) are inadequate against zero-day attacks.<n>Traditional signature-based NIDS are vulnerable to adversarial evasion attacks that subtly manipulate network traffic to bypass detection.<n>We propose a novel framework that enhances the robustness of ML-based NIDS by simultaneously integrating adversarial training, dataset balancing techniques, advanced feature engineering, ensemble learning, and extensive model fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T16:22:11Z)
• Meta Invariance Defense Towards Generalizable Robustness to Unknown Adversarial Attacks [62.036798488144306]
  Current defense mainly focuses on the known attacks, but the adversarial robustness to the unknown attacks is seriously overlooked. We propose an attack-agnostic defense method named Meta Invariance Defense (MID) We show that MID simultaneously achieves robustness to the imperceptible adversarial perturbations in high-level image classification and attack-suppression in low-level robust image regeneration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T10:10:38Z)
• Untargeted White-box Adversarial Attack with Heuristic Defence Methods in Real-time Deep Learning based Network Intrusion Detection System [0.0]
  In Adversarial Machine Learning (AML), malicious actors aim to fool the Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models to produce incorrect predictions. AML is an emerging research domain, and it has become a necessity for the in-depth study of adversarial attacks. We implement four powerful adversarial attack techniques, namely, Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), Jacobian Saliency Map Attack (JSMA), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) and Carlini & Wagner (C&W) in NIDS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T06:32:56Z)
• A Novel Deep Learning based Model to Defend Network Intrusion Detection System against Adversarial Attacks [0.0]
  The main aim of this research work is to study powerful adversarial attack algorithms and their defence method on DL-based NIDS. As a defence method, Adversarial Training is used to increase the robustness of the NIDS model. The results are summarized in three phases, i.e., 1) before the adversarial attack, 2) after the adversarial attack, and 3) after the adversarial defence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T18:48:39Z)
• Towards Adversarial Realism and Robust Learning for IoT Intrusion Detection and Classification [0.0]
  The Internet of Things (IoT) faces tremendous security challenges. The increasing threat posed by adversarial attacks restates the need for reliable defense strategies. This work describes the types of constraints required for an adversarial cyber-attack example to be realistic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T18:00:28Z)
• Guidance Through Surrogate: Towards a Generic Diagnostic Attack [101.36906370355435]
  We develop a guided mechanism to avoid local minima during attack optimization, leading to a novel attack dubbed Guided Projected Gradient Attack (G-PGA) Our modified attack does not require random restarts, large number of attack iterations or search for an optimal step-size. More than an effective attack, G-PGA can be used as a diagnostic tool to reveal elusive robustness due to gradient masking in adversarial defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-30T18:45:23Z)
• Fixed Points in Cyber Space: Rethinking Optimal Evasion Attacks in the Age of AI-NIDS [70.60975663021952]
  We study blackbox adversarial attacks on network classifiers. We argue that attacker-defender fixed points are themselves general-sum games with complex phase transitions. We show that a continual learning approach is required to study attacker-defender dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T23:42:16Z)
• Adversarial Attack and Defense in Deep Ranking [100.17641539999055]
  We propose two attacks against deep ranking systems that can raise or lower the rank of chosen candidates by adversarial perturbations. Conversely, an anti-collapse triplet defense is proposed to improve the ranking model robustness against all proposed attacks. Our adversarial ranking attacks and defenses are evaluated on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CUB200-2011, CARS196 and Stanford Online Products datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T13:41:45Z)
• Adaptive Feature Alignment for Adversarial Training [56.17654691470554]
  CNNs are typically vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which pose a threat to security-sensitive applications. We propose the adaptive feature alignment (AFA) to generate features of arbitrary attacking strengths. Our method is trained to automatically align features of arbitrary attacking strength.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T17:01:05Z)
• Sparse Coding Frontend for Robust Neural Networks [11.36192454455449]
  Deep Neural Networks are known to be vulnerable to small, adversarially crafted, perturbations. Current defense methods against these adversarial attacks are variants of adversarial training. In this paper, we introduce a radically different defense based on a sparse coding based on clean images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T11:14:32Z)
• A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustness [105.88250594033053]
  Adversarial examples can cause catastrophic mistakes in Deep Neural Network (DNNs) based vision systems. This paper proposes a self-supervised adversarial training mechanism in the input space. It provides significant robustness against the textbfunseen adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T20:42:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.