Explaining and Tuning Transformer-based LLMs in Arithmetic Tasks with Human Strategies
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17166v1
- Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 09:57:41 GMT
- Title: Explaining and Tuning Transformer-based LLMs in Arithmetic Tasks with Human Strategies
- Abstract summary: Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) continue to achieve state-of-the-art performance across various natural language processing tasks.<n>Their subpar performance on seemingly elementary problems, such as basic arithmetic, raises concerns about model reliability, safety, and ethical deployment.<n>We demonstrate that the performance of a vanilla Transformer model trained on integer arithmetic tasks can be improved using methods effective for human learners.
- Score: 17.888876226760576
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) continue to achieve state-of-the-art performance across various natural language processing tasks. However, their subpar performance on seemingly elementary problems, such as basic arithmetic, raises concerns about model reliability, safety, and ethical deployment. In this study, we demonstrate that the performance of a vanilla Transformer model trained on integer arithmetic tasks can be improved using methods effective for human learners. We begin by decomposing the arithmetic task into well-defined subtasks and conducting loss convergence order analysis together with ablation studies for each subtask. Our findings reveal that LLMs exhibit learning patterns similar to those of human learners, with a faster learning speed for simpler subtasks compared to more complex ones. In addition, we successfully improved the accuracy of LLMs by applying problem-solving strategies and cognitive empowerment methods shown to enhance the performance of human learners. This suggests that transformer-based LLMs may share cognitive processes with human learners in arithmetic. Lastly, we provide a comprehensive demonstration of our method's effectiveness, including significant accuracy improvement experiments, visualization verification, and explanation-based analysis to illuminate the intricacies of LLMs in arithmetic learning. In general, this work explores the potential similarities between transformer-based LLMs and human learners, supported by explainable AI (XAI) verifications, ultimately fostering trust in LLMs for critical and high-stakes applications.
Related papers
- How Reliable are LLMs for Reasoning on the Re-ranking task? [3.282961543904818]
We analyze how different training methods affect the semantic understanding of the re-ranking task in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>In newly developed systems with limited user engagement and insufficient ranking data, accurately re-ranking content remains a significant challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-25T19:48:39Z) - Teaching LLMs According to Their Aptitude: Adaptive Reasoning for Mathematical Problem Solving [55.895917967408586]
Existing approaches to mathematical reasoning with large language models rely on Chain-of-Thought (CoT) for generalizability or Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) for precise computation.<n>We propose TATA (Teaching LLMs According to Their Aptitude), an adaptive framework that enables LLMs to personalize their reasoning strategy spontaneously.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T16:56:23Z) - Task Arithmetic Through The Lens Of One-Shot Federated Learning [3.8230727103887943]
Task Arithmetic is a model merging technique that enables the combination of multiple models' capabilities into a single model.<n>We show that Task Arithmetic is mathematically equivalent to the commonly used algorithm in Federated Learning.<n>We adapt several algorithms from Federated Learning to improve the effectiveness of Task Arithmetic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-27T18:53:41Z) - Unraveling Arithmetic in Large Language Models: The Role of Algebraic Structures [2.8311048083168657]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable mathematical capabilities, largely driven by chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting.<n>We propose that LLMs learn arithmetic by capturing algebraic structures, such as commutativity and identity properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T10:23:11Z) - EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For In-Context Exploration [76.66831821738927]
Large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty.<n>We measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications.<n>Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T17:54:03Z) - Deconfounded Causality-aware Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Problem-Solving Improvement of LLMs [12.48241058167222]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in tackling various tasks based on human instructions.
But studies reveal that they often struggle with tasks requiring reasoning, such as math or physics limitation.
This raises questions about whether LLMs truly comprehend embedded knowledge or merely learn to replicate the token distribution without a true understanding of the content.
We propose Decon Causal Adaptation (DCA), a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) method to enhance the model's reasoning capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-04T13:17:09Z) - Interpreting and Improving Large Language Models in Arithmetic Calculation [72.19753146621429]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential across numerous applications.
In this work, we delve into uncovering a specific mechanism by which LLMs execute calculations.
We investigate the potential benefits of selectively fine-tuning these essential heads/MLPs to boost the LLMs' computational performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-03T07:01:46Z) - CoMMIT: Coordinated Multimodal Instruction Tuning [90.1532838391285]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) generally involve cooperative learning between a backbone LLM and a feature encoder of non-text input modalities.<n>In this paper, we analyze the MLLM instruction tuning from both theoretical and empirical perspectives.<n>We propose a Multimodal Balance Coefficient that enables quantitative measurement of the balance of learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T23:18:55Z) - From Summary to Action: Enhancing Large Language Models for Complex
Tasks with Open World APIs [62.496139001509114]
We introduce a novel tool invocation pipeline designed to control massive real-world APIs.
This pipeline mirrors the human task-solving process, addressing complicated real-life user queries.
Empirical evaluations of our Sum2Act pipeline on the ToolBench benchmark show significant performance improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T08:42:23Z) - How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback.
Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities.
We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z) - Accelerating LLaMA Inference by Enabling Intermediate Layer Decoding via
Instruction Tuning with LITE [62.13435256279566]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across a wide variety of natural language tasks.
However, their large size makes their inference slow and computationally expensive.
We show that it enables these layers to acquire 'good' generation ability without affecting the generation ability of the final layer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-28T04:07:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.