Thinking in Video: Can Video Generators Really Reason About the Real World?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17523v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 03:56:43 GMT
• Title: Thinking in Video: Can Video Generators Really Reason About the Real World?
• Abstract summary: Thinking in Video is where video is not merely an output artifact but a medium for constructing, extending, and verifying causal thought.<n>We introduce the Causal-Generative Dual-Judge (DJCG), auditing World Consistency Model from two perspectives.<n>We show that open-source models produce plausible dynamics despite near-zero explicit causal perception, whereas advanced closed-source systems show stronger but still limited alignment between reasoning and generation.
• Score: 48.57950330221376
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in world models and video generation have given rise to an emerging reasoning paradigm that leverages video generative models to simulate, predict, and reason about real-world dynamics. We redefine this paradigm as Thinking in Video, where video is not merely an output artifact but a medium for constructing, extending, and verifying causal thought. However, this promise remains unverified: convincing rollouts may reflect memorized appearances rather than causal understanding, while existing metrics separate perceptual fidelity from semantic logic. To evaluate whether video generators support such reasoning, we introduce the Causal-Generative Dual-Judge (CGDJ), auditing World Model Consistency from two perspectives. Explicit Causal Perception tests whether a generator reads a video scenario as a reasoning problem through spatio-temporal flattened visual question answering, while Implicit Generative Perception-Prediction Gap evaluates whether it renders the causal consequence as a consistent future video. Applying CGDJ to representative open- and closed-source generators reveals a clear Perception-Prediction Gap: open-source models produce plausible dynamics despite near-zero explicit causal perception, whereas advanced closed-source systems show stronger but still limited alignment between reasoning and generation. Further analysis exposes audio-visual misalignment, where models verbalize correct causal logic more reliably than they render it, challenging the "world simulator" narrative.

Related papers

• Autonomous Video Generation with Counterfactual Controllability for Self-Evolving World Models [40.57509385724164]
  Existing literature claims that video generation essentially is world modelling.<n>In this paper we present a new perspective, i.e., autonomous video generation with counterfactual controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T05:19:47Z)
• WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors [45.545823511469166]
  We introduce WorldReasonBench, which reframes video generation evaluation as world-state prediction.<n>We evaluate generated videos with a human-aligned two-part methodology.<n>WorldRewardBench is a preference benchmark with approximately 6K expert-annotated pairs over 1.4K videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T12:06:57Z)
• MME-CoF-Pro: Evaluating Reasoning Coherence in Video Generative Models with Text and Visual Hints [95.27042253462963]
  MME-CoF-Pro is a benchmark to assess reasoning coherence in video models.<n>MME-CoF-Pro contains 303 samples across 16 categories, ranging from visual logical to scientific reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T17:59:56Z)
• Are Video Models Ready as Zero-Shot Reasoners? An Empirical Study with the MME-CoF Benchmark [124.00111584020834]
  We conduct an empirical study to investigate whether video models are ready to serve as zero-shot reasoners.<n>We focus on the leading and popular Veo-3.<n>We evaluate its reasoning behavior across 12 dimensions, including spatial, geometric, physical, temporal, and embodied logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T17:59:55Z)
• When Thinking Drifts: Evidential Grounding for Robust Video Reasoning [68.75730050161219]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) mechanism has enhanced reasoning in text-based tasks.<n>CoT often degrades performance in video reasoning, generating verbose but misleading internal monologues.<n>Visual Evidence Reward (VER) is a reinforcement learning framework that explicitly rewards the generation of reasoning traces that are verifiably grounded in visual evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T16:03:33Z)
• Counterfactual reasoning: an analysis of in-context emergence [57.118735341305786]
  We show that language models are capable of counterfactual reasoning.<n>We find that self-attention, model depth and pre-training data diversity drive performance.<n>Our findings extend to counterfactual reasoning under SDE dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T16:02:07Z)
• Visual Abductive Reasoning [85.17040703205608]
  Abductive reasoning seeks the likeliest possible explanation for partial observations. We propose a new task and dataset, Visual Abductive Reasoning ( VAR), for examining abductive reasoning ability of machine intelligence in everyday visual situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-26T10:17:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.