Trustworthy Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction via Reliability-Aware Multi-Engine Fusion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17601v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 06:42:49 GMT
• Title: Trustworthy Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction via Reliability-Aware Multi-Engine Fusion
• Abstract summary: We introduce RELIABLE-BA, a framework for multi-engine binding affinity prediction.<n>Experiments on the PDBBind and BDB 2020+ benchmarks demonstrate competitive point prediction with substantially improved uncertainty calibration.<n>These uncertainty estimates enable reliable filtering of protein-ligand pairs, reducing prediction error by up to 25% when retaining only high-confidence pairs.
• Score: 17.232816400275727
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Accurate protein-ligand binding affinity prediction is central to computational drug discovery, yet modern docking engines frequently disagree without indicating which prediction to trust. Consensus scoring and ensemble methods improve mean accuracy but treat all predictions identically without interpretable confidence measures or uncertainty decomposition, ignoring the chemical context of each protein-ligand pair. To address this limitation, we introduce RELIABLE-BA (RELIABiLity-aware Evidential fusion for Binding Affinity), an evidential framework for multi-engine binding affinity prediction. Our model comprises three steps: (1) modeling each engine as an evidential expert via Normal-Inverse-Gamma distributions, (2) scaling epistemic uncertainty through learned reliability from molecular context while preserving each expert's predictive mean, and (3) fusing experts through closed-form aggregation that captures both individual uncertainty and inter-engine disagreement. Experiments on the PDBBind and BDB2020+ benchmarks demonstrate competitive point prediction with substantially improved uncertainty calibration, and additional validation on the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro dataset and 5HT2A receptor demonstrates applicability to clinically relevant drug targets. Crucially, these uncertainty estimates enable reliable filtering of protein-ligand pairs, reducing prediction error by up to 25% when retaining only high-confidence pairs. To our knowledge, RELIABLE-BA is the first multi-engine binding affinity prediction framework to combine evidential fusion with context-dependent reliability, offering a principled path toward trustworthy AI-guided drug discovery. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/yongchand/RELIABLE-BA.

Related papers

• $TCP_α$: Margin-Controlled Confidence estimation for reliable Music Information Retrieval [7.679660052685777]
  Deep neural networks are often overconfident, assigning high confidence even to incorrect predictions.<n>Existing targets suffer from inherent ambiguity: they assign overlapping confidence values to correct and incorrect predictions, while errors near the decision boundary receive confidence scores indistinguishable from correct predictions.<n>We propose $ TCP_$, a novel confidence target that resolves these limitations by introducing a margin-controlled penalty for misclassified samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-20T17:58:50Z)
• TIER-MoE: Trust-Informed Expert Routing via Conditional Modality Risk for Multimodal Fusion in Biomedical Classification [17.05370605692998]
  We introduce TIER-MoE, a risk-guided subspace mixture-of-experts model that defines sample-specific modality reliability.<n>We evaluate TIER-MoE on four public multimodal biomedical datasets spanning Alzheimer's disease status, skin-lesion malignancy, and retinal classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T14:55:55Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Trust Estimation for Multi-LLM Systems via Structured Expert Judgement [4.972323953932128]
  We formulate multi-LLM aggregation as a problem of uncertainty-aware trust estimation.<n>We employ Cooke-style log weighting, which penalises overconfident incorrect predictions.<n>We evaluate our approach on MMLU and MMLU-Pro across homogeneous, heterogeneous, and contaminated expert panels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-10T08:47:05Z)
• EnTrust: Modeling Inter-Modal Conflict for Trustworthy Multimodal Medical Image Analysis [41.67522319355107]
  EnTrust is a framework that treats inter-modal conflict as the primary source of predictive uncertainty.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art segmentation accuracy while reducing calibration error by 40% compared to the strongest baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-19T12:43:50Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• When should we trust the annotation? Selective prediction for molecular structure retrieval from mass spectra [3.2012147865361094]
  In high-stakes applications such as clinical metabolomics and environmental screening, incorrect annotations can have serious consequences.<n>We introduce a selective prediction framework for molecular structure retrieval from MS/MS spectra, enabling models to abstain from predictions when uncertainty is too high.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T16:40:50Z)
• Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
  We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z)
• TerraBind: Fast and Accurate Binding Affinity Prediction through Coarse Structural Representations [0.7891868017562221]
  We present TerraBind, a foundation model for protein-ligand structure and binding affinity prediction.<n>It achieves 26-fold faster inference than state-of-the-art methods while improving affinity prediction accuracy by $sim$20%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T00:01:43Z)
• Geometric Calibration and Neutral Zones for Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Class Classification [0.0]
  This work bridges information geometry and statistical learning, offering formal guarantees for uncertainty-aware classification in applications requiring rigorous validation.<n> Empirical validation on Adeno-Associated Virus classification demonstrates that the two-stage framework captures 72.5% of errors while deferring 34.5% of samples, reducing automated decision error rates from 16.8% to 6.9%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T01:29:49Z)
• Adaptive Individual Uncertainty under Out-Of-Distribution Shift with Expert-Routed Conformal Prediction [8.306260695214972]
  We introduce Trustworthy Expert Split-conformal with Scaled Estimation for Efficient Reliable Adaptive intervals (TESSERA)<n>TESSERA provides per-sample uncertainty with reliable coverage guarantee, informative and adaptive prediction interval widths that track the absolute error.<n>We evaluate on protein-ligand binding affinity prediction under both independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) and scaffold-based out-of-distribution (OOD) splits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T01:51:33Z)
• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification.<n>Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data.<n>We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Revisiting Confidence Estimation: Towards Reliable Failure Prediction [53.79160907725975]
  We find a general, widely existing but actually-neglected phenomenon that most confidence estimation methods are harmful for detecting misclassification errors. We propose to enlarge the confidence gap by finding flat minima, which yields state-of-the-art failure prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:44:14Z)
• Conservative Prediction via Data-Driven Confidence Minimization [70.93946578046003]
  In safety-critical applications of machine learning, it is often desirable for a model to be conservative. We propose the Data-Driven Confidence Minimization framework, which minimizes confidence on an uncertainty dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:05:36Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.