Chiral Analysis of Smart Contracts: Detecting Vulnerabilities from Relational Inconsistencies Across Business Paths
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17987v1
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:17:00 GMT
- Title: Chiral Analysis of Smart Contracts: Detecting Vulnerabilities from Relational Inconsistencies Across Business Paths
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces chiral analysis, a relational model that treats paired business paths as implicit specifications for each other.<n>We implement this idea in ChiralDetector, a Solidity prototype that extracts business paths.<n>ChiralDetector reduced 3,217 statically ranked path pairs to 1,643 semantic candidates, produced 101 deduplicated finding groups, and retained 44 strict-validator positives that manually collapsed to 13 unique issues.
- Score: 1.5217170480235822
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Smart-contract vulnerabilities often arise from inconsistencies between business paths that should correspond to one another, such as single and batch entry points, direct and adapter-based flows, quote and execution paths, or inverse operations such as buy and sell. Existing analyzers are effective for many local syntactic and data-flow patterns, but they provide limited support for bugs whose oracle is relational: whether two semantically paired paths preserve compatible guards, state transitions, value flows, and failure behavior. This paper introduces chiral analysis, a relational model that treats paired business paths as implicit specifications for each other. We formalize chiral relations as static analogues of metamorphic relations, derive obligations over guards, actors, state, value, ordering, failure behavior, and external interactions, and report a vulnerability when a violated obligation has security impact. We implement this idea in ChiralDetector, a Solidity prototype that extracts business paths, ranks candidate pairs with static facts, applies LLM-based semantic filtering and detection, and validates and deduplicates findings. In a preliminary evaluation on the Phi protocol, ChiralDetector reduced 3,217 statically ranked path pairs to 1,643 semantic candidates, produced 101 deduplicated finding groups, and retained 44 strict-validator positives that manually collapsed to 13 effective unique issues. These include cross-art Merkle proof reuse, fee unit mismatches, public state-tracking helpers, and refund propagation gaps. The results suggest that chiral analysis can expose business-logic bug classes that are difficult to express as single-function rules while providing a structured way to control LLM cost and validator precision.
Related papers
- AI Slop and Hallucinations in Vulnerability Assessment: A Survey on Reasoning Failures and Trustworthy Mitigation [48.55515767840701]
"AI slop" is artifacts, hallucinated vulnerabilities, plausible but incorrect patches, and semantically repackaged bug reports.<n>This paper surveys the empirical evidence, identifies a unifying mechanism, and traces a path toward trustworthy triage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-26T11:48:38Z) - Beyond Shapley: An Influence-Based Data Auditing Pipeline for LLM Alignment and Evaluation [2.733105115068754]
We introduce a scalable, inference-only data valuation pipeline that approximates the Shapley value without iterative model retraining.<n>We demonstrate the pipeline's efficacy in sanitizing two heavily vetted alignment datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-24T03:31:44Z) - Semantic Drift in Bug Resolution: How Behavioral Signals Propagate from Reports to Tests and Patches [18.727291516223115]
Desc2Fix is a framework for measuring semantic alignment between bug reports, triggering tests, and developer-written fixes.<n>We analyze 2,857 report-test-patch triplets from Defects4J and SWT-Bench using GPT-4o and DeepSeek-Chat.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-20T22:32:23Z) - GoAT-X: A Graph of Auditing Thoughts for Securing Token Transactions in Cross-Chain Contracts [52.51342355102833]
Cross-chain bridges, the critical infrastructure of the multi-chain ecosystem, have become a primary target for attackers.<n>Existing defenses, such as bytecode-level static analysis, are ill-equipped to handle the semantic complexity of cross-chain interactions.<n>We propose GoAT-X, a framework that shifts automated cross-chain smart contracts auditing from pattern matching toward systematic first-principles verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T11:34:21Z) - PSR2: A Phase-based Semantic Reasoning Framework for Atomicity Violation Detection via Contract Refinement [9.36682660657815]
PSRtextsuperscript2 is a novel collaborative static analysis framework that integrates structural path searching with deterministic semantic reasoning.<n>Experiments on 1,600 contract samples demonstrate that PSRtextsuperscript2 significantly outperforms pattern-matching baselines.<n>Our fusion logic effectively reduces the false-positive rate by nearly half compared to single module analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-08T11:46:01Z) - Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z) - TraceGuard: Process-Guided Firewall against Reasoning Backdoors in Large Language Models [19.148124494194317]
We propose TraceGuard, a process-guided security framework that transforms small-scale models into robust reasoning firewalls.<n>Our approach treats the reasoning trace as an untrusted payload and establishes a defense-in-depth strategy.<n>We demonstrate robustness against adaptive adversaries in a grey-box setting, establishing TraceGuard as a viable, low-latency security primitive.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T22:19:13Z) - The Semantic Trap: Do Fine-tuned LLMs Learn Vulnerability Root Cause or Just Functional Pattern? [14.472036099680961]
We propose TrapEval, a comprehensive evaluation framework designed to disentangle vulnerability root cause from functional pattern.<n>We fine-tune five representative state-of-the-art LLMs across three model families and evaluate them under cross-dataset testing, semantic-preservings, and varying degrees of semantic gap measured by CodeBLEU.<n>Our findings serve as a wake-up call: high benchmark scores on traditional datasets may be illusory, masking the model's inability to understand the true causal logic of vulnerabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T07:19:17Z) - DeLeaker: Dynamic Inference-Time Reweighting For Semantic Leakage Mitigation in Text-to-Image Models [55.30555646945055]
Text-to-Image (T2I) models are vulnerable to semantic leakage.<n>We introduce DeLeaker, a lightweight approach that mitigates leakage by directly intervening on the model's attention maps.<n>SLIM is the first dataset dedicated to semantic leakage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T17:39:21Z) - BURN: Backdoor Unlearning via Adversarial Boundary Analysis [73.14147934175604]
Backdoor unlearning aims to remove backdoor-related information while preserving the model's original functionality.<n>We propose Backdoor Unlearning via adversaRial bouNdary analysis (BURN), a novel defense framework that integrates false correlation decoupling, progressive data refinement, and model purification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-14T17:13:06Z) - Lie Detector: Unified Backdoor Detection via Cross-Examination Framework [68.45399098884364]
We propose a unified backdoor detection framework in the semi-honest setting.<n>Our method achieves superior detection performance, improving accuracy by 5.4%, 1.6%, and 11.9% over SoTA baselines.<n> Notably, it is the first to effectively detect backdoors in multimodal large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T06:12:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.