Bridging the Sim-to-Real Gap under Real-Time Constraints in Autonomous Racing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18586v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:45:46 GMT
• Title: Bridging the Sim-to-Real Gap under Real-Time Constraints in Autonomous Racing
• Abstract summary: This paper frames sim-to-real transfer in autonomous racing as a full-stack, real-time systems problem.<n>We present diagnostic metrics beyond nominal lap time, including performance flip, stability-oriented measures, sensitivity to delay and noise, and latency distribution characterization.<n>We outline benchmarking guidelines that enable reproducible and fair sim-to-real evaluation under compute and timing constraints.
• Score: 3.751342183022128
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous racing exposes the sim-to-real gap under extreme operating conditions characterized by high speed, tight stability margins, and stringent real-time constraints. Although simulation is indispensable for development, controllers that perform well in simulation often degrade abruptly on physical platforms due to interacting effects of dynamics mismatch, estimation delay, and execution-layer latency. This paper frames sim-to-real transfer in autonomous racing as a full-stack, real-time systems problem. We introduce a structured three-layer perspective (Physical/Cyber/Execution) to analyze how mismatches propagate and amplify through closed-loop feedback. We present diagnostic metrics beyond nominal lap time, including performance flip, stability-oriented measures, sensitivity to delay and noise, and latency distribution characterization. Mitigation strategies are synthesized from a deployment-oriented viewpoint, emphasizing execution-aware and delay-aware design. Finally, we outline benchmarking guidelines that enable reproducible and fair sim-to-real evaluation under compute and timing constraints. The resulting framework clarifies cross-layer failure mechanisms and provides practical design principles for deployable autonomous racing systems operating near dynamic limits.

Related papers

• WorldSimProbe: Diagnosing Simulator Faithfulness in Action-Conditioned World Models for Embodied Manipulation [85.15806404962193]
  Action-conditioned world models (ACWMs) promise to provide embodied AI with scalable predictive simulators for planning, policy evaluation, and data generation.<n>We evaluate ACWMs through the observable capabilities expected of physical simulators.<n>WorldSimProbe reveals systematic action-realization degradation across control variation, structured failures in interaction grounding and dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T08:48:06Z)
• A Task-Space Receding Horizon Controller for Fast Collision Avoidance [0.08594140167290099]
  Real-time collision avoidance for robotic manipulators requires fast reactions to unexpected obstacle motion.<n>Full model predictive control can provide this foresight, but its online cost may grow quickly with horizon length, model fidelity, and the number of active geometric constraints.<n>We present a task-space receding-horizon controller that uses a short contact-consistent rollout to generate a terminal kinematic reference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T08:13:12Z)
• PIER-Flow: Physics-Informed Efficient Rectified Flow for Real-Time Mobile Robot Navigation [10.164953732323463]
  PIER-Flow is a lightweight navigation policy for mobile robots.<n>It achieves a 98.85% success rate and zero collisions, with an average inference of $sim$1.29 ms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-11T12:34:28Z)
• Bench2Drive-Robust: Benchmarking Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving under Deployment Perturbations [122.22391796628408]
  We present Bench2Drive-Robust, to our knowledge the first device-centric robustness benchmark for closed-loop end-to-end autonomous driving.<n>We systematically evaluate deployment-oriented perturbations arising from three major sources: camera-stream failures, ego-state estimation errors, and compute-induced control delay.<n>Our results show that these deployment-related perturbations can substantially degrade closed-loop driving performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T08:45:24Z)
• F2F-AP: Flow-to-Future Asynchronous Policy for Real-time Dynamic Manipulation [62.06267255986041]
  Asynchronous inference has emerged as a prevalent paradigm in robotic manipulation.<n>In this paper, we propose a novel framework that leverages predicted object flow to synthesize future observations.<n>Our approach significantly enhances responsiveness and success rates in complex dynamic manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T17:57:15Z)
• FASTER: Rethinking Real-Time Flow VLAs [82.58822112377923]
  Real-time execution is crucial for deploying Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models in the physical world.<n>We show that reaction time follows a uniform distribution determined jointly by the Time to First Action (TTFA) and the execution horizon.<n>We propose Fast Action Sampling for ImmediaTE Reaction (FASTER) to overcome this issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T17:51:37Z)
• Sim2Act: Robust Simulation-to-Decision Learning via Adversarial Calibration and Group-Relative Perturbation [54.29523408543184]
  Simulation-to-decision learning enables safe policy training in digital environments without risking real-world deployment.<n>Existing approaches either focus on improving average simulation fidelity or adopt conservative regularization.<n>We propose Sim2Act, a robust simulation-to-decision framework that addresses both simulator and policy robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T00:51:47Z)
• ARTIS: Agentic Risk-Aware Test-Time Scaling via Iterative Simulation [72.78362530982109]
  ARTIS, Agentic Risk-Aware Test-Time Scaling via Iterative Simulation, is a framework that decouples exploration from commitment.<n>We show that naive LLM-based simulators struggle to capture rare but high-impact failure modes.<n>We introduce a risk-aware tool simulator that emphasizes fidelity on failure-inducing actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T06:33:22Z)
• Real-Time Robot Execution with Masked Action Chunking [38.37108371991901]
  Real-time execution is essential for cyber-physical systems such as robots.<n>Asynchronous inference has recently emerged as a system-level paradigm for real-time robot manipulation.<n>We propose REMAC, which learns corrective adjustments on the pretrained policy through masked action chunking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T23:48:32Z)
• Fast and Realistic Automated Scenario Simulations and Reporting for an Autonomous Racing Stack [1.40300365696538]
  We describe the automated simulation and reporting pipeline implemented for our autonomous racing stack, ur.autopilot.<n>The pipeline can execute the software stack and the simulation up to three times faster than real-time.<n>We describe how we implemented a fault injection module, capable of introducing sensor delays and perturbations as well as modifying outputs of any node of the stack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T18:36:20Z)
• RIFT: Group-Relative RL Fine-Tuning for Realistic and Controllable Traffic Simulation [13.319344167881383]
  We introduce a dual-stage AV-centric simulation framework that conducts imitation learning pre-training in a data-driven simulator.<n>We then learn fine-tuning in a physics-based simulator to enhance style-level controllability.<n>In the fine-tuning stage, we propose RIFT, a novel group-relative RL fine-tuning strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T09:12:37Z)
• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.