CASE: Causal Alignment and Structural Enforcement for Improving Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18820v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:56:14 GMT
• Title: CASE: Causal Alignment and Structural Enforcement for Improving Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness
• Abstract summary: Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is widely used to improve both the performance and interpretability of large language models (LLMs)<n>We study this problem from a causal perspective, where a faithful CoT process should follow the chain $Zrightarrow Xrightarrow Y$, with $Z$, $X$, and $Y$ denoting the instruction, reasoning chain, and final answer, respectively.<n>We propose CASE, a framework that combines training-time causal alignment and inference-time structural enforcement.
• Score: 25.486054658242693
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is widely used to improve both the performance and interpretability of large language models (LLMs), yet the generated reasoning may not faithfully support the final answer. We study this problem from a causal perspective, where a faithful CoT process should follow the chain $Z\rightarrow X\rightarrow Y$, with $Z$, $X$, and $Y$ denoting the instruction, reasoning chain, and final answer, respectively. In this process, the instruction should affect the answer only through the reasoning chain. However, conventional autoregressive LLMs condition answer generation on both the instruction and the CoT, which still allows a direct instruction-to-answer shortcut. To address this issue, we propose CASE, a framework that combines training-time causal alignment and inference-time structural enforcement. During training, CASE builds counterfactual-CoT, biased-instruction, and empty-instruction datasets, and applies selective-loss fine-tuning to strengthen CoT-to-answer dependence while suppressing instruction shortcuts. During inference, CASE masks direct attention from instruction tokens to answer tokens, preventing the model from bypassing the generated CoT. We provide an information-theoretic analysis showing how these components promote faithful chains. Experiments on three models and four benchmarks show that CASE achieves a 37\% average per-setting relative improvement in overall CoT faithfulness over the strongest baselines, exhibits stronger cross-dataset faithfulness transfer, and maintains competitive average accuracy. Code is available at https://github.com/oddwang/CASE.

Related papers

• WhisperRec: Latent Reasoning for Efficient Foundation Recommendation Models [51.88075626243057]
  We propose WhisperRec, an efficient latent reasoning framework for foundation recommendation models (FRMs)<n>WhisperRec compresses teacher-generated Chain-of-Thought (CoT) into learnable latent reasoning tokens.<n>We show that WhisperRec consistently outperforms explicit-CoT methods and conventional baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T08:48:35Z)
• Revisiting Chain-of-Thought Reasoning under Limited Supervision: Semi-supervised Chain-of-Thought Learning [17.893249958828218]
  We propose a framework that uses unlabeled questions to construct pseudo reasoning supervision.<n>Semi-CoT samples multiple pseudo-CoTs for each unlabeled question, estimates answer-level semantic entropy, and selects low-entropy reasoning chains as reliable pseudo-CoT demonstrations.<n>Pilot experiments on AQuA, SVAMP, GSM8K, and MultiArith show that the entropy gate selects high-precision pseudo-CoTs, with pseudo-answer precision ranging from $91.36%$ to $100%$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T22:17:39Z)
• Faithfulness as Information Flow: Evaluating and Training Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [10.87972575497941]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is useful for monitoring language models.<n>Models can rely on prompt-to-answer shortcuts that bypass the CoT.<n>We study CoT faithfulness through a structural information-flow perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T23:37:29Z)
• Structural Anchors and Reasoning Fragility:Understanding CoT Robustness in LLM4Code [13.598118096561775]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting is widely used to elicit explicit reasoning from large language models for code (LLM4Code)<n>We study how CoT reshapes internal uncertainty dynamics and why it sometimes harms rather than helps code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T02:48:29Z)
• FACT-E: Causality-Inspired Evaluation for Trustworthy Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [49.65751420291115]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has improved LLM reasoning, but models often generate explanations that appear coherent while containing unfaithful intermediate steps.<n>We propose FACT-E, a causality-inspired framework for evaluating CoT quality.<n>We show that FACT-E improves reasoning-trajectory selection and yields stronger in-context learnings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T15:35:08Z)
• Hierarchical Chain-of-Thought Prompting: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Performance and Efficiency [4.139013391483979]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has significantly improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>In this work, we introduce Hierarchical Chain-of-Thought (Hi-CoT) prompting.<n>Hi-CoT decomposes the reasoning process into hierarchical substeps by alternating between instructional planning and step-by-step execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T18:35:22Z)
• Balancing Faithfulness and Performance in Reasoning via Multi-Listener Soft Execution [79.98699884805636]
  Reasoning Execution by Multiple Listeners (REMUL) is a multi-party reinforcement learning approach.<n>REMUL builds on the hypothesis that reasoning traces which other parties can follow will be more faithful.<n>Speakers are rewarded for producing reasoning that is clear to listeners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T02:55:55Z)
• SIM-CoT: Supervised Implicit Chain-of-Thought [108.30049193668083]
  Implicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methods offer a token-efficient alternative to explicit CoT reasoning in Large Language Models.<n>We identify a core latent instability issue when scaling the computational budget of implicit CoT.<n>We propose SIM-CoT, a plug-and-play training module that introduces step-level supervision to stabilize and enrich the latent reasoning space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T17:01:32Z)
• Fractured Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [61.647243580650446]
  We introduce Fractured Sampling, a unified inference-time strategy that interpolates between full CoT and solution-only sampling.<n>We show that Fractured Sampling consistently achieves superior accuracy-cost trade-offs, yielding steep log-linear scaling gains in Pass@k versus token budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T11:30:41Z)
• To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoning [55.52872152909785]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) via prompting is the de facto method for eliciting reasoning capabilities from large language models (LLMs)<n>We show that CoT gives strong performance benefits primarily on tasks involving math or logic, with much smaller gains on other types of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T17:55:00Z)
• Stress Testing Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Language Models [0.16317061277456998]
  This report examines the effectiveness of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting in improving the multi-step reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the impact of three types of CoT prompt perturbations, namely CoT order, CoT values, and CoT operators on the performance of GPT-3 on various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T17:21:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.