Benchmarking Human and Automatic Speech Recognition of Diverse Speech: Initial Results

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19049v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:37:41 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Human and Automatic Speech Recognition of Diverse Speech: Initial Results
• Abstract summary: We compare state-of-the-art ASR systems and Dutch native listeners on the recognition of "diverse" speech.<n>Google Telephony outperformed the other ASR systems.<n>Slight performance differences between the listeners and ASR systems were found related to speaker's age and regional accents.
• Score: 11.972180644020483
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Humans are often considered to be the best listeners and seen as the upper-bound performance of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. We present a preliminary comparison of the performances of state-of-the-art ASR systems and Dutch native listeners on the recognition of "diverse" speech, specifically Dutch child and older adults' speech and Flemish. Google Telephony outperformed the other ASR systems. Importantly, the ASR systems showed similar performance to the listeners, and in specific cases even outperformed them. Slight performance differences between the listeners and ASR systems were found related to speaker's age and regional accents and utterance length. Future research should focus on making ASR systems more robust to acoustic variability related to aging and regional accents. A comparison of ASR recognition performances on the test stimuli and the full Jasmin-CGN test sets showed the influence of the specific test sets on the conclusions regarding benchmarking human and ASR performance.

Related papers

• RW-Voice-EQ Bench: A Real World Benchmark for Evaluating Voice AI Systems [5.434878413067881]
  We introduce the Real World Voice EQ Bench, a multidimensional benchmark for evaluating voice AI across text-to-speech (TTS), speech-to-speech (STS), speech understanding (SU), and automatic speech recognition (ASR)<n>Our evaluations indicate that performance is highly dimension-specific.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-16T11:15:16Z)
• MUSCAT: MUltilingual, SCientific ConversATion Benchmark [60.87925076316812]
  The goal of multilingual speech technology is to facilitate seamless communication between individuals speaking different languages.<n>To create this experience, speech technology needs to address several challenges: Handling mixed multilingual input, specific vocabulary, and code-switching.<n>We propose a new benchmark to evaluate current Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems, whether they are able to handle these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T10:39:01Z)
• How to Evaluate Automatic Speech Recognition: Comparing Different Performance and Bias Measures [15.722009470067974]
  We compare different performance and bias measures, from literature and proposed, to evaluate end-to-end ASR systems for Dutch.<n>The findings reveal that averaged error rates, a standard in ASR research, alone is not sufficient and should be supplemented by other measures.<n>The paper ends with recommendations for reporting ASR performance and bias to better represent a system's performance for diverse speaker groups, and overall system bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T11:17:13Z)
• ASR Benchmarking: Need for a More Representative Conversational Dataset [3.017953715883516]
  We introduce a multilingual conversational dataset, derived from TalkBank, consisting of unstructured phone conversation between adults. Our results show a significant performance drop across various state-of-the-art ASR models when tested in conversational settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T15:03:04Z)
• Reexamining Racial Disparities in Automatic Speech Recognition Performance: The Role of Confounding by Provenance [7.882996636086014]
  It is important that automatic speech recognition (ASR) models and their use is fair and equitable. The current study seeks to understand the factors underlying this disparity by examining the performance of the current state-of-the-art neural network based ASR system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T02:14:17Z)
• Layer-Wise Analysis of Self-Supervised Acoustic Word Embeddings: A Study on Speech Emotion Recognition [54.952250732643115]
  We study Acoustic Word Embeddings (AWEs), a fixed-length feature derived from continuous representations, to explore their advantages in specific tasks. AWEs have previously shown utility in capturing acoustic discriminability. Our findings underscore the acoustic context conveyed by AWEs and showcase the highly competitive Speech Emotion Recognition accuracies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T21:24:54Z)
• ASR data augmentation in low-resource settings using cross-lingual multi-speaker TTS and cross-lingual voice conversion [49.617722668505834]
  We show that our approach permits the application of speech synthesis and voice conversion to improve ASR systems using only one target-language speaker during model training. It is possible to obtain promising ASR training results with our data augmentation method using only a single real speaker in a target language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T11:55:30Z)
• A study on native American English speech recognition by Indian listeners with varying word familiarity level [62.14295630922855]
  We have three kinds of responses from each listener while they recognize an utterance. From these transcriptions, word error rate (WER) is calculated and used as a metric to evaluate the similarity between the recognized and the original sentences. Speaker nativity wise analysis shows that utterances from speakers of some nativity are more difficult to recognize by Indian listeners compared to few other nativities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T07:43:38Z)
• An Exploration of Self-Supervised Pretrained Representations for End-to-End Speech Recognition [98.70304981174748]
  We focus on the general applications of pretrained speech representations, on advanced end-to-end automatic speech recognition (E2E-ASR) models. We select several pretrained speech representations and present the experimental results on various open-source and publicly available corpora for E2E-ASR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-09T15:06:09Z)
• Accented Speech Recognition: A Survey [0.0]
  We present a survey of current promising approaches to accented speech recognition. The resulting bias in ASR performance across accents comes at a cost to both users and providers of ASR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-21T20:21:06Z)
• Arabic Speech Recognition by End-to-End, Modular Systems and Human [56.96327247226586]
  We perform a comprehensive benchmarking for end-to-end transformer ASR, modular HMM-DNN ASR, and human speech recognition. For ASR the end-to-end work led to 12.5%, 27.5%, 23.8% WER; a new performance milestone for the MGB2, MGB3, and MGB5 challenges respectively. Our results suggest that human performance in the Arabic language is still considerably better than the machine with an absolute WER gap of 3.6% on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T05:55:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.