Selection Shapes the Boundary: A Preregistered Replication of Monotonicity and Label Agreement in Unselected NLI Populations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19231v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:03:05 GMT
- Title: Selection Shapes the Boundary: A Preregistered Replication of Monotonicity and Label Agreement in Unselected NLI Populations
- Abstract summary: An earlier study found that hypotheses containing non-upward monotonicity operators showed lower label agreement.<n>We preregistered a replication of this boundary using the same operator tagger and a four-level ordinal agreement outcome.<n>We conclude that the earlier negative boundary is plausibly a structure conditional on low-agreement selection rather than a population-level property.
- Score: 1.9177583131035885
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Prior work on human label variation (HLV) in natural language inference (NLI) has often relied on re-annotation resources that select items by disagreement level. An earlier study (arXiv:2607.15870) found that hypotheses containing non-upward monotonicity operators showed lower label agreement in ChaosNLI (Cliff's delta = -0.284), which is restricted to items whose majority label carries exactly three of five votes. We preregistered a replication of this boundary in the unselected populations that ChaosNLI was drawn from: the SNLI and MultiNLI development sets, using the same operator tagger and a four-level ordinal agreement outcome. The registered prediction fails. All seven contrasts return a positive Cliff's delta (non-upward items agree slightly more, not less), the only significant confirmatory contrast has the opposite sign to the registration, and every effect is far below our smallest effect size of interest (0.10). Robustness checks support the measurement: simulated tagger misclassification shrinks the effects rather than manufacturing them, and a manual re-tagging audit reaches four-class agreement of 0.875 on a fresh 200-item sample. We conclude that the earlier negative boundary is plausibly a structure conditional on low-agreement selection rather than a population-level property, and that HLV structure claims built on selected re-annotation resources should state their selection conditional explicitly.
Related papers
- Beyond the Name: Demographic Leakage in De-Identified Résumés and Evaluation Artifacts in LLM Bias Audits [4.736836688901646]
We investigate whether eliminating language fields resolves leakage across nine open-weight models and 620 résumés.<n>We isolate unstructured prose across five ethnocultural conditions and three cue-salience tiers.<n>Target-group recovery averages 0.757 overall and saturates at 1.000 under high salience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-15T01:48:44Z) - Abliteration Is Not a Scalpel: Off-Target Effects of Refusal Removal on Decision Disposition Across Model Families [51.56484100374058]
Abliteration - deleting a model's refusal direction from its weights - is the standard recipe behind popular "uncensored" open-weight models.<n>As a disposition probe we use 21,600 decisions under uncertainty, replayed through a frozen pipeline so the decision-layer model is the only variable.<n>Three effects replicate across both families (weeks-clustered CIs excluding zero)<n>A fourth effect reverses sign: the same operation makes Gemma-abliterated less confident and Qwen-abliterated more (family CIs non-overlapping)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-19T22:27:00Z) - How Much Human Label Variation Does Formal Semantic Structure Explain?: Group-Level Effects and Item-Level Ceilings in NLI [1.9177583131035885]
Human label variation in natural language inference is increasingly treated as signal rather than noise.<n>We measure it on the 3,113 SNLI and MNLI items of ChaosNLI using a rule-based operator and monotonicity tagger validated against MED.<n>In this sample, formal semantic structure shifts how much annotators disagree by a small amount and does not detectably change what they disagree about.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-17T11:34:30Z) - Null-Calibrated Conformal Selection via Target-Membership Scores [0.6599344783327052]
Conformal selection aims to identify test candidates whose unknown responses fall in a target region while controlling the false discovery rate.<n>We argue that the natural score for selection is instead the target-membership probability.<n>We study membership-score-based conformal selection and isolate one conformal calibration route, Null-Calibrated Conformal Selection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-21T05:03:04Z) - Multi-Label Test-Time Adaptation with Bayesian Conditional Priors [15.878958356965159]
Conditional Priors Estimation (BCP) is a gradient-free test-time adaptation method that injects label dependency without tuning the backbone.<n>BCP operates without target annotations by estimating anchor-conditioned priors online from the unlabeled test stream.<n>BCP consistently outperforms strong TTA baselines across standard multi-label benchmarks and multiple CLIP backbones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-11T05:29:00Z) - A Held-Out Transition-Pair Falsifier for Long-Horizon Non-Abelian State Tracking [0.5076419064097734]
We introduce a held-out transition-pair falsifier for finite non-Abelian group tracking.<n>In a controlled $S_3 times S_3$ benchmark, a projected recurrent state model trained only on length-8 sequences produces error-free final-state predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-05T13:26:41Z) - Metric-Dependent Annotation Saturation for Learning from Label Distributions [0.0]
We fine-tune NLI models on label distributions subsampled from ChaosNLI.<n>In our 3-class NLI setting, entropy correlation requires N 20-50 annotators to converge.<n>Soft labels carry item-specific signal that label smoothing cannot replicate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T11:46:51Z) - Project-Probe-Aggregate: Efficient Fine-Tuning for Group Robustness [61.45587642780908]
We propose a three-step approach for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of image-text foundation models.<n>Our method improves its two key components: minority samples identification and the robust training algorithm.<n>Our theoretical analysis shows that our PPA enhances minority group identification and is Bayes optimal for minimizing the balanced group error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T15:46:12Z) - Appeal: Allow Mislabeled Samples the Chance to be Rectified in Partial Label Learning [55.4510979153023]
In partial label learning (PLL), each instance is associated with a set of candidate labels among which only one is ground-truth.
To help these mislabeled samples "appeal," we propose the first appeal-based framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T09:09:52Z) - Shrinking Class Space for Enhanced Certainty in Semi-Supervised Learning [59.44422468242455]
We propose a novel method dubbed ShrinkMatch to learn uncertain samples.
For each uncertain sample, it adaptively seeks a shrunk class space, which merely contains the original top-1 class.
We then impose a consistency regularization between a pair of strongly and weakly augmented samples in the shrunk space to strive for discriminative representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-13T14:05:24Z) - Conformal Language Modeling [61.94417935386489]
We propose a novel approach to conformal prediction for generative language models (LMs)
Standard conformal prediction produces prediction sets with rigorous, statistical guarantees.
We demonstrate the promise of our approach on multiple tasks in open-domain question answering, text summarization, and radiology report generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-16T21:55:08Z) - Ambiguity-Resistant Semi-Supervised Learning for Dense Object Detection [98.66771688028426]
We propose a Ambiguity-Resistant Semi-supervised Learning (ARSL) for one-stage detectors.
Joint-Confidence Estimation (JCE) is proposed to quantifies the classification and localization quality of pseudo labels.
ARSL effectively mitigates the ambiguities and achieves state-of-the-art SSOD performance on MS COCO and PASCAL VOC.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-27T07:46:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.