The Storyteller in the Model: Narrative Pattern Inheritance, Escalation Dynamics, and Alignment Governance in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20449v1
• Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 22:22:04 GMT
• Title: The Storyteller in the Model: Narrative Pattern Inheritance, Escalation Dynamics, and Alignment Governance in LLMs
• Abstract summary: Narrative conventions embedded in human-authored text are rarely examined as a source of systematic behavioral influence.<n>This paper considers whether the storytelling patterns inherent in published human writing, including archetypal roles such as protagonist, antagonist, and underdog, are absorbed during training.<n>The findings reveal three key patterns. First, LLMs reproduce statistical patterns from their training data rather than reasoning independently. Second, measurable latent traits, including sycophancy and deceptiveness, emerge reliably across unrelated prompts. Third, fine-tuning on a narrow narrative task can produce unintended behavioral changes well beyond that task.
• Score: 1.3112847740767446
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: LLMs are trained predominantly on human-authored text, yet the structural and narrative conventions embedded in that text are rarely examined as a source of systematic behavioral influence, or as a governance risk in deployed systems. This paper considers whether the storytelling patterns inherent in published human writing, including archetypal roles such as protagonist, antagonist, and underdog, as well as tension-and-resolution narrative arcs, are absorbed during training and subsequently surface in LLM outputs, causing responses to drift toward unexpected, adversarial, or rhetorically enticing behaviors over extended interactions. Through a systematic literature review and cross-paper analysis of recent empirical studies on LLM alignment, persona dynamics, emergent misalignment, and user interaction patterns, we observe evidence bearing on this hypothesis. The findings reveal three key patterns. First, LLMs reproduce statistical patterns from their training data rather than reasoning independently. Second, measurable latent traits, including sycophancy and deceptiveness, emerge reliably across unrelated prompts. Third, fine-tuning on a narrow narrative task can produce unintended behavioral changes well beyond that task. Furthermore, evidence suggests that persuasive, narrative-style outputs are among the most common LLM products in real-world usage, amplifying these risks. Narrative drift constitutes an unmonitored escalation pathway in deployed AI systems, one that evades discrete-incident detection mechanisms and requires dedicated monitoring instruments.

Related papers

• LLMs Reading the Rhythms of Daily Life: Aligned Understanding for Behavior Prediction and Generation [53.62804271492357]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising direction due to their semantic richness, strong interpretability, and generative capabilities.<n>We propose Behavior Understanding Alignment (BUA), a novel framework that integrates LLMs into human behavior modeling through a structured curriculum learning process.<n>BUA employs sequence embeddings from pretrained behavior models as alignment anchors and guides the LLM through a three-stage curriculum, while a multi-round dialogue setting introduces prediction and generation capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T07:34:37Z)
• Enhancing Structural Mapping with LLM-derived Abstractions for Analogical Reasoning in Narratives [13.352345916789337]
  Analogical reasoning is a key driver of human generalization in problem-solving and argumentation.<n>We propose a modular framework named YARN, which uses LLMs to decompose narratives into units, abstract these units, and then passes them to a mapping component that aligns elements across stories to perform analogical reasoning.<n>Our experiments reveal that abstractions consistently improve model performance, resulting in competitive or better performance than end-to-end LLM baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T16:57:11Z)
• Self-Consolidation for Self-Evolving Agents [51.94826934403236]
  Large language model (LLM) agents operate as static systems, lacking the ability to evolve through lifelong interaction.<n>We propose a novel self-evolving framework for LLM agents that introduces a complementary evolution mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T11:16:07Z)
• Living the Novel: A System for Generating Self-Training Timeline-Aware Conversational Agents from Novels [50.43968216132018]
  We present an end-to-end system that transforms any literary work into an immersive, multi-character conversational experience.<n>This system is designed to solve two fundamental challenges for LLM-driven characters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T11:57:46Z)
• Belief Dynamics Reveal the Dual Nature of In-Context Learning and Activation Steering [22.666436755894328]
  Large language models (LLMs) can be controlled at inference time through prompts (in-context learning) and internal activations (activation steering)<n>This work offers a unified account of prompt-based and activation-based control of LLM behavior, and a methodology for empirically predicting the effects of these interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T16:46:03Z)
• The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMs [60.15472325639723]
  Personality traits have long been studied as predictors of human behavior.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) suggest similar patterns may emerge in artificial systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T21:27:10Z)
• Your AI Bosses Are Still Prejudiced: The Emergence of Stereotypes in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems [3.35957402502816]
  We investigate the emergence and evolution of stereotypes in AI-based multi-agent systems.<n>Our findings reveal that AI agents develop stereotype-driven biases in their interactions despite beginning without predefined biases.<n>These systems exhibit group effects analogous to human social behavior, including halo effects, confirmation bias, and role congruity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T14:25:43Z)
• A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet their propensity for hallucination remains a critical challenge.<n>This report provides a comprehensive taxonomy of LLM hallucinations, beginning with a formal definition and a theoretical framework.<n>It analyzes the underlying causes, categorizing them into data-related issues, model-related factors, and prompt-related influences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T14:37:16Z)
• If an LLM Were a Character, Would It Know Its Own Story? Evaluating Lifelong Learning in LLMs [55.8331366739144]
  We introduce LIFESTATE-BENCH, a benchmark designed to assess lifelong learning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our fact checking evaluation probes models' self-awareness, episodic memory retrieval, and relationship tracking, across both parametric and non-parametric approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T16:50:57Z)
• Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives [51.19592551510628]
  We investigate the interaction between world knowledge and logical reasoning.<n>We find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial generalizations.<n>We show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:48:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.