Bounding the Causal Impact of ML-assisted Decision-Making via Counterfactual Correctness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21806v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:45:10 GMT
• Title: Bounding the Causal Impact of ML-assisted Decision-Making via Counterfactual Correctness
• Abstract summary: We present a partial-identification approach to constructing bounds on the causal effect of a new model.<n>The core innovation in our approach is to leverage assumptions relating fine-grained predictive accuracy to downstream outcomes.
• Score: 2.9267249513932008
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Predictive machine learning (ML) models are increasingly used to aid human decision-makers across various high-risk domains such as healthcare and criminal justice. There is a growing recognition of the need to evaluate the causal impact of deploying these systems on downstream outcomes, such as patient survival or crime recidivism. Randomized control trials (RCTs) can provide high-quality evidence on the impact of a deployed model, but they run into a challenge: it is often infeasible to run repeated trials when models are updated or retrained to improve predictive performance. In this work, we present a partial-identification approach to using prior RCT data to construct bounds on the causal effect of a new model. The core innovation in our approach is to leverage assumptions relating fine-grained predictive accuracy to downstream outcomes. We do so via two monotonicity assumptions: first, on individual-level `counterfactual correctness' (all else being equal, a correct prediction leads to non-inferior outcomes); and second, on the relation between subgroup predictive performance and outcomes, interpretable as an assumption regarding trust in model outputs. We demonstrate our method with a simulation study, illustrating how incorporating this information can lead to more informative bounds compared to prior work.

Related papers

• Probabilistic indirect models for undrained shear strength: addressing significant data missing and variability with advanced imputation and machine learning techniques [3.6913038494792656]
  Accurate prediction of undrained shear strength (su) is crucial for geotechnical design, but is often hampered by substantial uncertainty.<n>This study uses the CLAY/10/7490 global database to develop probabilistic indirect models to predict su.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-14T04:15:16Z)
• On Predicting the Post-training Potential of Pre-trained LLMs [60.07459271263409]
  We introduce a new task of predicting post-training potential - forecasting a base model's performance before post-training.<n>We propose RuDE, a unified framework that bypasses the generation gap of base models by leveraging response discrimination.<n>Experiments demonstrate a correlation greater than 90% with post-training performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T11:33:49Z)
• Observationally Informed Adaptive Causal Experimental Design [55.998153710215654]
  We propose Active Residual Learning, a new paradigm that leverages the observational model as a foundational prior.<n>This approach shifts the experimental focus from learning target causal quantities from scratch to efficiently estimating the residuals required to correct observational bias.<n> Experiments on synthetic and semi-synthetic benchmarks demonstrate that R-Design significantly outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T06:52:37Z)
• Multiply Robust Conformal Risk Control with Coarsened Data [0.0]
  Conformal Prediction (CP) has recently received a tremendous amount of interest.<n>In this paper, we consider the general problem of obtaining distribution-free valid prediction regions for an outcome given coarsened data.<n>Our principled use of semiparametric theory has the key advantage of facilitating flexible machine learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T12:14:44Z)
• Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects [62.56890808004615]
  We propose a novel partial identification framework that enables researchers to answer key questions.<n>Is the causal effect positive or negative? and How severe must assumption violations be to overturn this conclusion?<n>We apply our framework to the Project STAR study, which investigates the effect of classroom size on students' third-grade standardized test performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T07:13:01Z)
• Prediction-Powered Causal Inferences [59.98498488132307]
  We focus on Prediction-Powered Causal Inferences (PPCI)<n>We first show that conditional calibration guarantees valid PPCI at population level.<n>We then introduce a sufficient representation constraint transferring validity across experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T10:52:17Z)
• Quantifying the Prediction Uncertainty of Machine Learning Models for Individual Data [2.1248439796866228]
  This study investigates pNML's learnability for linear regression and neural networks.<n>It demonstrates that pNML can improve the performance and robustness of these models on various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T13:58:19Z)
• Counterfactual Generative Modeling with Variational Causal Inference [1.9287470458589586]
  We present a novel variational Bayesian causal inference framework to handle counterfactual generative modeling tasks.<n>In experiments, we demonstrate the advantage of our framework compared to state-of-the-art models in counterfactual generative modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T16:44:12Z)
• Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Training Deep Networks [83.44219640437657]
  Deep learning models are prone to learning spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues. We propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observable confounders. We conduct experiments on two real-world tasks: Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Image Captioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T17:47:16Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Double Robust Representation Learning for Counterfactual Prediction [68.78210173955001]
  We propose a novel scalable method to learn double-robust representations for counterfactual predictions. We make robust and efficient counterfactual predictions for both individual and average treatment effects. The algorithm shows competitive performance with the state-of-the-art on real world and synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:39:26Z)
• A comprehensive study on the prediction reliability of graph neural networks for virtual screening [0.0]
  We investigate the effects of model architectures, regularization methods, and loss functions on the prediction performance and reliability of classification results. Our result highlights that correct choice of regularization and inference methods is evidently important to achieve high success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T10:13:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.