Comparing and Conceptualizing Data Protection Requirements Worldwide for Privacy Regulatory Compliance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22270v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:08:13 GMT
• Title: Comparing and Conceptualizing Data Protection Requirements Worldwide for Privacy Regulatory Compliance
• Abstract summary: transborder personal data flows (TPDF) are essential to today's economy.<n> organizations managing them must reconcile data protection requirements that differ, sometimes subtly, across jurisdictions.<n>For requirements engineering, this is the central challenge: regulatory data protection requirements (Rs) are complex and not directly translatable into software requirements.<n>We identify common requirements, such as consent, and divergent ones, such as the right to be forgotten.
• Score: 1.8730179018673334
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The growing digitalization of society has intensified the collection, processing, and sharing of personal data, increasingly moving across national borders and regulatory jurisdictions, prompting a proliferation of data protection frameworks worldwide. These transborder personal data flows (TPDF) are essential to today's economy, but organizations managing them must reconcile data protection requirements that differ, sometimes subtly, across jurisdictions. For requirements engineering, this is the central challenge: regulatory data protection requirements (RDPRs) are complex and not directly translatable into software requirements, especially when frameworks impose similar, non-identical, or contradictory obligations. Identifying which requirements are shared and which diverge is therefore critical to managing TPDF, and addressing them late in the software development lifecycle (SDLC) causes costly rework, making early identification essential for compliance and stakeholder communication. This paper identifies and conceptualizes common RDPRs worldwide from the perspective of data protection legal experts, answering: (SQ1) which requirements are common across regulations and how are they conceptualized, and (SQ2) which requirements diverge and how do they differ conceptually. We combine deductive qualitative analysis of interviews with 70 legal experts from G20 economies and other countries and systematic content analysis of these economies' data protection regulations. We identify common requirements, such as consent, and divergent ones, such as the right to be forgotten. Given their impact across the SDLC and enterprise architecture, we translate these findings into a set of Data Protection Officer DPO (DPO) stories, using the user story notation, classified by SDLC phase and enterprise architecture layer, to help organizations manage TPDF compliance.

Related papers

• Security, privacy, and agentic AI in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections [53.468443050795344]
  The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has led to a dynamic regulatory landscape.<n>As AI paradigms shift towards greater autonomy, specifically in the form of agentic AI, it becomes increasingly challenging to articulate regulatory stipulations.<n>This paper reviews the evolving European Union (EU) AI regulatory provisions via analyzing 24 relevant documents published between 2024 and 2025.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T13:50:52Z)
• Analyzing and Internalizing Complex Policy Documents for LLM Agents [53.14898416858099]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agentic systems rely on in-context policy documents encoding diverse business rules.<n>This motivates developing internalization methods that embed policy documents into model priors while preserving performance.<n>We introduce CC-Gen, an agentic benchmark generator with Controllable Complexity across four levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T16:30:07Z)
• Rethinking Data Protection in the (Generative) Artificial Intelligence Era [138.07763415496288]
  We propose a four-level taxonomy that captures the diverse protection needs arising in modern (generative) AI models and systems.<n>Our framework offers a structured understanding of the trade-offs between data utility and control, spanning the entire AI pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T02:45:51Z)
• Modelling Privacy Compliance in Cross-border Data Transfers with Bigraphs [0.0]
  We propose a privacy framework based on Milner's Bigraphical Reactive Systems.<n>We demonstrate the framework's applicability by modelling WhatsApp's privacy policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T11:50:55Z)
• Lawful and Accountable Personal Data Processing with GDPR-based Access and Usage Control in Distributed Systems [0.0]
  This paper proposes a case-generic method for automated normative reasoning that establishes legal arguments for the lawfulness of data processing activities.<n>The arguments are established on the basis of case-specific legal qualifications made by privacy experts, bringing the human in the loop.<n>The resulting system is designed and critically assessed in reference to requirements extracted from the GPDR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T10:49:34Z)
• Data Sharing, Privacy and Security Considerations in the Energy Sector: A Review from Technical Landscape to Regulatory Specifications [49.567747749614924]
  Decarbonization, decentralization and digitalization are the three key elements driving the twin energy transition.<n>This paper conducts a comprehensive review of the data-related issues for the energy system by integrating both technical and regulatory dimensions.<n>We classify the issues into three categories: (i) data-sharing among energy end users and stakeholders (ii) privacy of end users, and (iii) cyber security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T14:23:56Z)
• CBCMS: A Compliance Management System for Cross-Border Data Transfer [0.41942958779358674]
  We propose Cross-Border Compliance Management System (CBCMS) for cross-border data transfer.<n>PDL supports the unified management of data processing policies, bridging the gap between natural language policies and machine-processable expressions.<n>CPGM generates compliant data processing policies with high accuracy, achieving up to 25.16% improvement in F1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T06:48:00Z)
• RIRAG: Regulatory Information Retrieval and Answer Generation [51.998738311700095]
  We introduce a task of generating question-passages pairs, where questions are automatically created and paired with relevant regulatory passages.<n>We create the ObliQA dataset, containing 27,869 questions derived from the collection of Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) financial regulation documents.<n>We design a baseline Regulatory Information Retrieval and Answer Generation (RIRAG) system and evaluate it with RePASs, a novel evaluation metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T14:44:19Z)
• Legal Requirements Analysis [2.3349787245442966]
  We explore a variety of methods for analyzing legal requirements and exemplify them on representations. We describe possible alternatives for creating machine-analyzable representations from regulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T09:31:57Z)
• Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
  We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z)
• The SPECIAL-K Personal Data Processing Transparency and Compliance Platform [0.1385411134620987]
  SPECIAL EU H 2020 project can be used to represent data policies and data and events sharing. System can verify that data processing and sharing complies with the data subjects consent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-26T14:30:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.