\k{appa}-LoRA: Condition Numbers Reveal Which LoRA Matrices Worth Updating

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22489v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:00:40 GMT
• Title: \k{appa}-LoRA: Condition Numbers Reveal Which LoRA Matrices Worth Updating
• Abstract summary: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a technique for efficient neural network fine-tuning.<n>kappa-LoRA focuses updates on the matrices with the largest condition numbers.<n>kappa-LoRA halves the trainable parameter count and correspondingly reduces compute and memory cost.
• Score: 24.538290063991997
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become a widely adopted technique for efficient neural network fine-tuning, decomposing model updates into low-rank matrices. However, LoRA remains computationally costly because it updates all matrices uniformly, regardless of their actual contribution to adaptation. This cost is especially prohibitive for large-scale models with billions of parameters and for resource-constrained settings such as edge deployment and on-device fine-tuning. We show for the first time that not all LoRA matrices are equally worth tuning: matrices with smaller condition numbers (the ratio of largest to smallest singular value) are already well-balanced across directions and contribute only marginally to adaptation, whereas matrices with larger condition numbers contain underdeveloped directions that span richer subspaces and drive most of the performance gains. This observation itself is a key contribution of our work, and it motivates a more selective approach to fine-tuning. Building on this insight, we propose \k{appa}-LoRA, a method that optimizes LoRA by focusing updates on the matrices with the largest condition numbers, which capture the most informative directions of change. By restricting LoRA updates to the top 50% of weight matrices ranked by condition number, \k{appa}-LoRA halves the trainable parameter count and correspondingly reduces compute and memory cost. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks show that this design cuts fine-tuning time by 16.2% on average while matching the accuracy of standard LoRA and reducing memory cost by 4.5%. Further analysis reveals that the condition numbers of the selected matrices consistently decrease over training, suggesting that \k{appa}-LoRA's effectiveness stems from targeted spectral rebalancing rather than parameter selection alone.

Related papers

• SMoA: Spectrum Modulation Adapter for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning [57.85676271833619]
  Low-rank Adaptation (LoRA) uses a low-rank update method to simulate full parameter fine-tuning.<n>As the rank increases, more principal singular directions are preserved, which generally improves the model's performance.<n>We propose SMoA, a textbfSpectrum textbfModulation textbfAdapter that enlarges the accessible family of spectrum-aware updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T13:19:28Z)
• Faster Than SVD, Smarter Than SGD: The OPLoRA Alternating Update [50.36542772932594]
  Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tunes large models by learning low-rank updates on top of frozen weights.<n>There is still a gap between full training with low-rank projections (SVDLoRA) and LoRA fine-tuning, indicating that LoRA steps can be further improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T10:32:50Z)
• QR-LoRA: QR-Based Low-Rank Adaptation for Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models [0.0]
  Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a technique for reducing the number of trainable parameters by applying low-rank updates to pretrained weights.<n>We show that QR-LoRA matches or exceeds the performance of full fine-tuning, standard LoRA, and SVD-LoRA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T17:47:27Z)
• BeamLoRA: Beam-Constraint Low-Rank Adaptation [51.52097743781401]
  Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has been widely adopted as one of the most effective parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods.<n>We propose BeamLoRA, which conceptualizes each LoRA module as a beam where each rank naturally corresponds to a potential sub-solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T10:33:22Z)
• GeLoRA: Geometric Adaptive Ranks For Efficient LoRA Fine-tuning [2.7446241148152253]
  Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is computationally intensive because it requires updating all parameters.<n>Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) improves efficiency by modifying only a subset of weights but introduces a trade-off between expressivity and computational cost.<n>We propose Geometric Low-Rank Adaptation (GeLoRA), a novel framework that computes the intrinsic dimensionality of hidden state representations to adaptively select LoRA ranks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T13:04:54Z)
• LoRA vs Full Fine-tuning: An Illusion of Equivalence [73.5303340531806]
  We study how Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and full-finetuning change pre-trained models.<n>We find that LoRA and full fine-tuning yield weight matrices whose singular value decompositions exhibit very different structure.<n>We extend the finding that LoRA forgets less than full fine-tuning and find its forgetting is vastly localized to the intruder dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T17:14:01Z)
• LoRA Done RITE: Robust Invariant Transformation Equilibration for LoRA Optimization [78.93425154518705]
  Low-rank adaption (LoRA) is a widely used parameter-efficient finetuning method for LLM that reduces memory requirements.<n>This paper introduces LoRA-RITE, a novel adaptive matrix preconditioning method for LoRA optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T22:57:12Z)
• CoRA: Optimizing Low-Rank Adaptation with Common Subspace of Large Language Models [7.108651381160281]
  Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) strategy balances efficiency and performance in fine-tuning large models. We propose textbfCoRA: leveraging shared knowledge to optimize LoRA training by substituting its matrix $B$ with a common subspace from large models. Our experiments show that the first approach achieves the same efficacy as the original LoRA fine-tuning while being more efficient than halving parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-31T12:48:27Z)
• LoRA-Pro: Are Low-Rank Adapters Properly Optimized? [121.0693322732454]
  Low-rank adaptation, also known as LoRA, has emerged as a prominent method for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of foundation models.<n>Despite its computational efficiency, LoRA still yields inferior performance compared to full fine-tuning.<n>We introduce LoRA-Pro, a method that enhances LoRA's performance by strategically adjusting the gradients of low-rank matrices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T17:57:12Z)
• SBoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation with Regional Weight Updates [19.15481369459963]
  This paper introduces Standard Basis LoRA (SBoRA), a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning approach for Large Language Models. SBoRA reduces the number of trainable parameters by half or doubles the rank with the similar number of trainable parameters as LoRA. Our results demonstrate the superiority of SBoRA-FA over LoRA in various fine-tuning tasks, including commonsense reasoning and arithmetic reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T15:37:13Z)
• LoRA-XS: Low-Rank Adaptation with Extremely Small Number of Parameters [11.23006032094776]
  We introduce LoRA-XS, a novel fine-tuning method backed by a theoretical derivation.<n>LoRA-XS drastically reduces trainable parameters by incorporating a small, trainable weight matrix.<n>It can scale from a single parameter per module to arbitrarily large values, adapting to any storage or computational constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T19:07:13Z)
• Chain of LoRA: Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models via Residual Learning [31.036465632204663]
  We introduce Chain of LoRA, an iterative optimization framework inspired by the Frank-Wolfe algorithm. We demonstrate that COLA can consistently outperform LoRA without additional computational or memory costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-08T14:26:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.