ARdena: Scenario-driven control of real-time LLM agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22651v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:58:33 GMT
• Title: ARdena: Scenario-driven control of real-time LLM agents
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces layered scenario-driven LLM control, a framework that enables runtime behavior control through structured prompting.<n>The framework is implemented in ARDena, a real-time multimodal embodied agent that integrates speech interaction, visual perception, tool use, and avatar-based response generation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have enabled increasingly capable conversational agents, but reliably controlling their behavior in real-time interactive environments remains a significant challenge. Existing approaches often rely on model fine-tuning or alignment procedures that are difficult to adapt to changing interaction requirements. This paper introduces layered scenario-driven LLM control, a framework that enables runtime behavior control through structured prompting. By combining persistent context with scenario-specific constraints, the approach allows agent behavior to be modified during interaction without changing the underlying model. The framework is implemented in ARDena, a real-time multimodal embodied agent that integrates speech interaction, visual perception, tool use, and avatar-based response generation. The proposed approach is evaluated with respect to control effectiveness, response latency, and operational stability. The results demonstrate that scenario definitions alone can produce substantially different interaction behaviors while maintaining stable real-time operation, highlighting the effectiveness of scenario-driven prompting for controlling LLM agents.

Related papers

• From Profiling to Synthesis: Benchmarking Implicit Behavioral Alignment in Personalized LLM Agents [56.187590188698955]
  Large Language Models have enabled increasingly capable autonomous agents, yet personalization remains critical for making such agents practically useful.<n>Recent benchmarks have begun evaluating personalization in agents, but they largely rely on static preference snapshots, fixed interaction logs, or question answering over predefined user profiles.<n>We introduce IBA-Bench, a benchmark for implicit behavioral alignment constructed from longitudinal interaction histories.<n>We propose IBA-Agent, an agent framework that reconciles conflicting priorities through broad retrieval and trajectory-level alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T12:52:04Z)
• Learning to Watch: Active Video Anomaly Understanding via Interleaved Policy Optimization [56.150184676745205]
  Video anomaly understanding (VAU) relies on sparse, context-dependent cues.<n>We propose $Anomtext-$, a closed-loop framework that reconceptualizes video understanding as an active sequential decision-making process.<n>Inspired by human video-reviewing behavior, this framework unifies internal cognitive reasoning and strategic evidence acquisition into an interleaved policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T08:41:49Z)
• Proposal-Conditioned Latent Diffusion for Closed-Loop Traffic Scenario Generation [1.6711881128691604]
  We present a diffusion-based scenario generation framework conditioned on instance-centric scene context and multimodal proposal priors.<n>Experiments on the Open Motion dataset demonstrate a favorable balance among realism, safety, and controllability across diverse interactive scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-25T15:01:31Z)
• IDEA: Insensitive to Dynamics Mismatch via Effect Alignment for Sim-to-Real Transfer in Multi-Agent Control [9.294981970003892]
  We propose a sim-to-real method for multi-agent control, which is insensitive to dynamics mismatch via effect alignment.<n>Our method combines random environmental structure with discrete semantic actions through closed-loop control, elevating policy learning to a semantic abstraction level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-25T03:49:25Z)
• SafeCtrl-RL: Inference-Time Adaptive Behaviour Control for LLM Dialogue via RL-Driven Prompt Optimisation [2.0855978149238403]
  We present textbfSafeCtrl-RL, an inference-time behavioural control framework.<n>It enables adaptive safety regulation without model retraining or parameter modification.<n>It consistently improves safety and response quality, outperforms existing prompt-based optimisation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T16:03:38Z)
• OLIVIA: Online Learning via Inference-time Action Adaptation for Decision Making in LLM ReAct Agents [74.20327254615854]
  Large language model agents interleave reasoning, action selection, and observation to solve sequential decision-making tasks.<n>Existing inference-time adaptation methods for LLM agents mainly rely on prompting or retrieval.<n>We propose OLIVIA, an inference-time action adaptation framework for ReAct-style agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T19:28:20Z)
• VITA-E: Natural Embodied Interaction with Concurrent Seeing, Hearing, Speaking, and Acting [66.90028121194636]
  Current Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are often constrained by a rigid, static interaction paradigm.<n>VITA-E is a novel embodied interaction framework designed for both behavioral and nearly real-time interruption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T17:59:56Z)
• ToolACE-MT: Non-Autoregressive Generation for Agentic Multi-Turn Interaction [84.90394416593624]
  Agentic task-solving with Large Language Models (LLMs) requires multi-turn, multi-step interactions.<n>Existing simulation-based data generation methods rely heavily on costly autoregressive interactions between multiple agents.<n>We propose a novel Non-Autoregressive Iterative Generation framework, called ToolACE-MT, for constructing high-quality multi-turn agentic dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T07:38:23Z)
• Dynamic benchmarking framework for LLM-based conversational data capture [0.0]
  This paper introduces a benchmarking framework to assess large language models (LLMs)<n>It integrates generative agent simulation to evaluate performance on key dimensions: information extraction, context awareness, and adaptive engagement.<n>Results show that adaptive strategies improve data extraction accuracy, especially when handling ambiguous responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T15:47:47Z)
• DynaSaur: Large Language Agents Beyond Predefined Actions [126.98162266986554]
  Existing LLM agent systems typically select actions from a fixed and predefined set at every step.<n>We propose an LLM agent framework that can dynamically create and compose actions as needed.<n>In this framework, the agent interacts with its environment by generating and executing programs written in a general-purpose programming language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T02:08:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.