Child-Oriented AIGC Video Risk Reviewing: A Benchmark and Knowledge-Supported Iterative Reasoning Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22715v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:29:39 GMT
• Title: Child-Oriented AIGC Video Risk Reviewing: A Benchmark and Knowledge-Supported Iterative Reasoning Framework
• Abstract summary: We study child-oriented AIGC video reviewing, making three contributions.<n>First, we construct CAVSR, a benchmark of 605 real-world videos collected from multiple platforms.<n>Second, we propose QVRS-E, a knowledge- and experience-augmented video reviewing framework.
• Score: 18.322787201155048
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence-generated content (AIGC) is reshaping video production and circulation, exposing children to an increasing volume of AIGC videos. Unlike traditionally produced videos, AIGC videos often exhibit greater uncertainty in visual details, narrative coherence, and content expression, which may introduce developmentally inappropriate risks for children. However, existing video safety research is largely designed for general violation detection from an adult perspective and remains insufficient for identifying the fine-grained, implicit, and context-dependent risks that children may encounter when viewing AIGC videos. To address this gap, we study child-oriented AIGC video reviewing, making three contributions. First, we construct CAVSR, a benchmark of 605 real-world videos collected from multiple platforms, and develop a hierarchical risk taxonomy comprising 6 top-level categories and 26 fine-grained labels to support systematic evaluation of children's viewing risks. Second, we propose QVRS-E, a knowledge- and experience-augmented video reviewing framework that combines multi-agent collaboration with expert and experiential knowledge to support targeted evidence acquisition and fact-grounded reviewing decisions. Third, extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the reviewing of child-related risks integrated with vision-language models, and yields more robust review reports.

Related papers

• CAREBench: A Child-Safety Risk Benchmark for Language Models [8.997978966432546]
  CAREBench is a benchmark to assess upstream child-safety risks in language models.<n>It includes grooming and relationship engineering, deception and impersonation, surveillance and privacy, sextortion and sexual abuse.<n>It evaluates whether models recognize, refuse, de-escalate, or redirect risky interactions before harm becomes overt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T01:17:41Z)
• VideoKR: Towards Knowledge- and Reasoning-Intensive Video Understanding [52.925648827667935]
  We introduce VideoKR, the first large-scale training corpus specifically designed to strengthen video understanding.<n>VideoKR comprises 315K video reasoning examples over 145K newly collected, CC-licensed, expert-domain videos.<n>We develop a human-in-the-loop, skill-oriented example generation pipeline that targets progressively deeper video reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T16:14:20Z)
• Are Video Models Zero-Shot Learners and Reasoners in Education? EduVideoBench, A Knowledge-Skills-Attitude Benchmark for Educational Video Generation [11.425144935556789]
  We present EduVideoBench, the first balanced benchmark in the education domain.<n>Our results show substantial room for improvement across knowledge, skills, and attitude before they are classroom-ready.<n>We hope EduVideoBench will guide the development of VGMs that are pedagogically grounded and safe for the classroom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T12:16:41Z)
• Video-MME-v2: Towards the Next Stage in Benchmarks for Comprehensive Video Understanding [98.3098451637867]
  Video-MME-v2 is a comprehensive benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the robustness and faithfulness of video understanding.<n>To guarantee data quality, Video-MME-v2 is constructed through a rigorously controlled human annotation pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T17:59:56Z)
• A Skill-augmented Agentic Framework and Benchmark for Multi-Video Understanding [69.31609753061137]
  Multimodal Large Language Models have achieved strong performance in single-video understanding, yet their ability to reason across multiple videos remains limited.<n>Existing approaches typicallyulate multiple videos into a single input and performulate direct inference, which introduces training-inference mismatch.<n>Current multi-video benchmarks primarily emphasize event-level comparison, leaving identity-level matching, fine-grained discrimination, and structured multi-step reasoning underexplored.<n>We propose SAMA, a Skill-Augmented Agentic Framework for Multi-Video Understanding, which integrates visual tools, task-specific skills, and a conflict-aware verification mechanism
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T02:09:48Z)
• Benchmarking Knowledge-Extraction Attack and Defense on Retrieval-Augmented Generation [50.87199039334856]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a cornerstone of knowledge-intensive applications.<n>Recent studies show that knowledge-extraction attacks can recover sensitive knowledge-base content through maliciously crafted queries.<n>We introduce the first systematic benchmark for knowledge-extraction attacks on RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T01:27:46Z)
• Catching Dark Signals in Algorithms: Unveiling Audiovisual and Thematic Markers of Unsafe Content Recommended for Children and Teenagers [13.39320891153433]
  The prevalence of short form video platforms, combined with the ineffectiveness of age verification mechanisms, raises concerns about the potential harms facing children and teenagers in an algorithm-moderated online environment.<n>We conducted multimodal feature analysis and thematic topic modeling of 4,492 short videos recommended to children and teenagers on Instagram Reels, TikTok, and YouTube Shorts.<n>This feature-level and content-level analysis revealed that unsafe (i.e., problematic, mentally distressing) short videos possess darker visual features and contain explicitly harmful content and implicit harm from anxiety-inducing ordinary content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T18:41:42Z)
• DAVID-XR1: Detecting AI-Generated Videos with Explainable Reasoning [58.70446237944036]
  DAVID-X is the first dataset to pair AI-generated videos with detailed defect-level, temporal-spatial annotations and written rationales.<n>We present DAVID-XR1, a video-language model designed to deliver an interpretable chain of visual reasoning.<n>Our results highlight the promise of explainable detection methods for trustworthy identification of AI-generated video content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T13:39:53Z)
• Video-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Video LVLMs [45.265397990158846]
  Video-SafetyBench is the first benchmark designed to evaluate the safety of LVLMs under video-text attacks.<n>It comprises 2,264 video-text pairs spanning 48 fine-grained unsafe categories.<n>To generate semantically accurate videos for safety evaluation, we design a controllable pipeline that decomposes video semantics into subject images and motion text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T05:06:38Z)
• Generative Ghost: Investigating Ranking Bias Hidden in AI-Generated Videos [106.5804660736763]
  Video information retrieval remains a fundamental approach for accessing video content.<n>We build on the observation that retrieval models often favor AI-generated content in ad-hoc and image retrieval tasks.<n>We investigate whether similar biases emerge in the context of challenging video retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T07:43:47Z)
• T2VSafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Text-to-Video Generative Models [39.15695612766001]
  We introduce T2VSafetyBench, a new benchmark for safety-critical assessments of text-to-video models. We define 12 critical aspects of video generation safety and construct a malicious prompt dataset. No single model excels in all aspects, with different models showing various strengths. There is a trade-off between the usability and safety of text-to-video generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T14:04:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.