From Vibe to Code -- and Back: Lexical Oscillation in the Formation of Design Intent with Generative AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23126v1
• Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:00:55 GMT
• Title: From Vibe to Code -- and Back: Lexical Oscillation in the Formation of Design Intent with Generative AI
• Abstract summary: We ask how design intent is formed through situated interaction with AI.<n>Five expert UI/UX designers designed landing-page hero sections with a generative AI tool.<n>We position AI as a non-neutral generative interlocutor and ambiguity as a resource for design judgment.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI design tools make natural-language prompts a starting point for design, placing new articulation demands on designers. Rather than treating prompts as the transmission of pre-existing design intent, we ask how design intent is formed through situated interaction with AI. Five expert UI/UX designers (11-20 years' experience, M = 15.4) designed landing-page hero sections with a generative AI tool, recorded through think-aloud and retrospective interviews. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we used lexical granularity (L1 vibe, L2 design-domain, L3 operational language) as a sensitizing lens. Rather than moving from vibe to code unidirectionally, designers showed lexical oscillation, including returns from operational specificity to ambiguity. Mismatches with AI outputs were taken up as occasions for designers to reconsider what they meant, and engagement shifted from instruction to consultation. One non-oscillating trajectory -- a negative case -- suggested conceptual misalignment as a tentative boundary for future examination. We position AI as a non-neutral generative interlocutor and ambiguity as a resource for design judgment.

Related papers

• Design Generative AI for Practitioners: Exploring Interaction Approaches Aligned with Creative Practice [20.726284013271584]
  We present three interaction approaches that distribute control across intent, input, and process.<n>We argue that alignment is a dynamic negotiation, with AI adopting proactive or reactive roles according to designers' instrumental and inspirational needs and the creative stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T15:19:23Z)
• Beyond Pixels: Visual Metaphor Transfer via Schema-Driven Agentic Reasoning [56.24016465596292]
  A visual metaphor constitutes a high-order form of human creativity, employing cross-domain semantic fusion to transform abstract concepts into impactful visual rhetoric.<n>We introduce the task of Visual Metaphor Transfer (VMT), which challenges models to autonomously decouple the "creative essence" from a reference image and re-materialize that abstract logic onto a user-specified subject.<n>Our method significantly outperforms SOTA baselines in metaphor consistency, analogy appropriateness, and visual creativity, paving the way for automated high-impact creative applications in advertising and media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T17:01:36Z)
• Vibe Coding for UX Design: Understanding UX Professionals' Perceptions of AI-Assisted Design and Development [17.585262775172055]
  Generative AI is reshaping UX design practices through "vibe coding," where UX professionals express intent in natural language and AI generates prototypes and code.<n>We show how vibe coding follows a four-stage workflow of ideation, AI generation, debug, and review.<n>We find tensions between efficiency-driven prototyping and reflection, introducing new asymmetries in trust, responsibility, and social stigma within teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T19:28:38Z)
• A vibe coding learning design to enhance EFL students' talking to, through, and about AI [5.671810777243196]
  This article reports on the piloting of vibe coding (using natural language to create software applications with AI) for English as a Foreign Language education.<n>We developed a human-AI meta-languaging framework with three dimensions: talking to AI (prompt engineering), talking through AI (negotiating authorship), and talking about AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-09T00:27:04Z)
• ThematicPlane: Bridging Tacit User Intent and Latent Spaces for Image Generation [49.805992099208595]
  We introduce ThematicPlane, a system that enables users to navigate and manipulate high-level semantic concepts.<n>This interface bridges the gap between tacit creative intent and system control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T06:57:14Z)
• AI-Instruments: Embodying Prompts as Instruments to Abstract & Reflect Graphical Interface Commands as General-Purpose Tools [22.004677014808458]
  Chat-based prompts respond with linear-sequential texts, making it difficult to explore and refine ambiguous intents.<n>We show how AI-Instruments embody "prompts" as interface objects via three key principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T01:11:24Z)
• Sketch2Code: Evaluating Vision-Language Models for Interactive Web Design Prototyping [55.98643055756135]
  We introduce Sketch2Code, a benchmark that evaluates state-of-the-art Vision Language Models (VLMs) on automating the conversion of rudimentary sketches into webpage prototypes. We analyze ten commercial and open-source models, showing that Sketch2Code is challenging for existing VLMs. A user study with UI/UX experts reveals a significant preference for proactive question-asking over passive feedback reception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T17:39:49Z)
• I-Design: Personalized LLM Interior Designer [57.00412237555167]
  I-Design is a personalized interior designer that allows users to generate and visualize their design goals through natural language communication. I-Design starts with a team of large language model agents that engage in dialogues and logical reasoning with one another. The final design is then constructed in 3D by retrieving and integrating assets from an existing object database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T16:17:53Z)
• Designerly Understanding: Information Needs for Model Transparency to Support Design Ideation for AI-Powered User Experience [42.73738624139124]
  Designers face hurdles understanding AI technologies, such as pre-trained language models, as design materials. This limits their ability to ideate and make decisions about whether, where, and how to use AI. Our study highlights the pivotal role that UX designers can play in Responsible AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T02:06:24Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• Object-and-Action Aware Model for Visual Language Navigation [70.33142095637515]
  Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) is unique in that it requires turning relatively general natural-language instructions into robot agent actions. We propose an Object-and-Action Aware Model (OAAM) that processes these two different forms of natural language based instruction separately. This enables each process to match object-centered/action-centered instruction to their own counterpart visual perception/action orientation flexibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T06:32:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.