Extreme Volatility Warning under Label Scarcity via Multi-Source Anomaly Fusion
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23682v1
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 14:30:58 GMT
- Title: Extreme Volatility Warning under Label Scarcity via Multi-Source Anomaly Fusion
- Abstract summary: In our CSI300 setting, only $sim$80 positive samples are observed across 791 training days, making heavily supervised multi-source models unstable.<n>We propose textbfAAMSF (Anomaly-Augmented Multi-Signal Fusion), a semisupervised framework that combines anomaly scores over market indicators, GDELT events, Chinese financial news, and English media with lightweight Ridge score fusion.<n>On CSI300, AAMSF achieves test AUC-ROC textbf0.680, outperforming the strongest unsupervised baseline (0.630) and neural baseline (0.588
- Score: 9.298391210599604
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Early warning of extreme market volatility is central to financial risk management, but actionable events are rare, nonstationary, and often triggered by exogenous information shocks. In our CSI~300 setting, only $\sim$80 positive samples are observed across 791 training days, making heavily supervised multi-source models unstable. We first analyze a 100K-parameter hierarchical text-signal fusion model (HTSF) and find that added parameterization hurts in this low-label regime. Motivated by this failure, we propose \textbf{AAMSF} (Anomaly-Augmented Multi-Signal Fusion), a semisupervised framework that combines Isolation Forest anomaly scores over market indicators, GDELT events, Chinese financial news, and English media with lightweight Ridge score fusion. We further introduce \textbf{T-AAMSF}, a temporal extension for multi-day anomaly accumulation. On CSI~300 (2018--2023), AAMSF achieves test AUC-ROC \textbf{0.680}, outperforming the strongest unsupervised baseline (0.630) and neural baseline (0.588), while T-AAMSF improves PR-AUC to 0.291. Ablations reveal strong source asymmetry: GDELT and domestic financial news provide complementary risk signals, whereas English media consistently reduces performance, and learned weighting is unreliable under validation noise. These results suggest an empirical design principle for label-scarce financial risk warning: robust anomaly geometry and source reliability can matter more than supervised representation capacity.
Related papers
- Graph-Transformer Fraud Detection with Self-Supervised Pretraining and Conformal Risk Control [0.0]
GTFD fuses structural and temporal evidence from a corporation's payment graph.<n>It reduces the false-positive rate by about 29% relative to the strongest baseline.<n>It retains 89.2% accuracy at perturbation magnitude 0.20 where the next-best model falls to 76.4%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-13T01:56:22Z) - Multi-Agent Framework for Audit Risk Assessment with Explicit Uncertainty and Evidence Conflict Modeling [6.05989830654114]
UMAR is a framework that employs three specialized agents: an MD&A Text Agent, a Financial Ratio Agent, and a CAM Agent.<n>We evaluate UMAR on a U.S. dataset of 3,200 firm-year observations from SEC 10-K filings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-14T07:06:03Z) - From Risk to Rescue: An Agentic Survival Analysis Framework for Liquidation Prevention [46.90931293070464]
We propose an autonomous agent that perceives risk, simulates counterfactual futures, and executes protocol-faithful interventions to proactively prevent liquidations.<n>We validate our approach using a high-fidelity, protocol-faithful Aave v3 simulator on a cohort of 4,882 high-risk user profiles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-16T03:22:05Z) - ATBench: A Diverse and Realistic Agent Trajectory Benchmark for Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis [96.92417622318267]
ATBench is a trajectory-level benchmark for structured, diverse, and realistic evaluation of agent safety.<n>It organizes agentic risk along three dimensions: risk source, failure mode, and real-world harm.<n>It contains 1,000 trajectories (503 safe and 497 unsafe), averaging 9.01 turns and 3.95k tokens, with 1,954 invoked tools drawn from pools spanning 2,084 available tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T13:26:20Z) - Early Rug Pull Warning for BSC Meme Tokens via Multi-Granularity Wash-Trading Pattern Profiling [3.1262100364392205]
High-frequency issuance and short-cycle speculation of meme tokens in decentralized finance (DeFi) have significantly amplified rug-pull risk.<n>Existing approaches still struggle to provide stable early warning under scarce anomalies, incomplete labels, and limited interpretability.<n>To address this issue, an end-to-end warning framework is proposed for BSC meme tokens, consisting of four stages: dataset construction and labeling, wash-trading pattern feature modeling, risk prediction, and error analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-14T08:25:42Z) - Uncertainty-Gated Generative Modeling [0.3437656066916039]
Financial time-series forecasting is a high-stakes problem where regime shifts and shocks make point-accurate yet overconfident models dangerous.<n>We propose Uncertainty-Gated Generative Modeling (UGGM), which treats uncertainty as an internal control signal.<n>Our UG-WIAE-GPF significantly improves risk-sensitive forecasting, delivering a 63.5% MSE reduction on NYISO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-08T18:02:00Z) - Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z) - Statistical Estimation of Adversarial Risk in Large Language Models under Best-of-N Sampling [50.872910438715486]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are typically evaluated for safety under single-shot or low-budget adversarial prompting.<n>We propose a scaling-aware Best-of-N estimation of risk, SABER, for modeling jailbreak vulnerability under Best-of-N sampling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T06:54:35Z) - Risk-Aware Financial Forecasting Enhanced by Machine Learning and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making [7.394315090978424]
The framework fuses structured financial data, unstructured text data, and macroeconomic indicators to enhance predictive accuracy and robustness.<n>It incorporates a hybrid suite of models, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), long short-term memory (LSTM) network, graph neural network (GNN)<n>The empirical results demonstrate high forecasting accuracy, with a net profit mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 3.03% and narrow 95% confidence intervals for key financial indicators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-11T04:19:26Z) - Bayesian Modeling for Uncertainty Management in Financial Risk Forecasting and Compliance [0.0]
We develop an integrated approach that consistently enhances the handling of risk in market volatility forecasting, fraud detection, and compliance monitoring.<n>We evaluate the performance of one-day-ahead 95% Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecasts on daily S&P 500 returns, with a training period from 2000 to 2019 and an out-of-sample test period spanning 2020 to 2024.<n>Our proposed discount-factor DLM model produces a slightly liberal VaR estimate, with evidence of clustered violations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-06T23:00:19Z) - A FEDformer-Based Hybrid Framework for Anomaly Detection and Risk Forecasting in Financial Time Series [0.8065001399110248]
This study proposes a FEDformer-Based Hybrid Framework for Anomaly Detection and Risk Forecasting in Financial Time Series.<n>It integrates the Frequency Enhanced Decomposed Transformer (FEDformer) with a residual-based anomaly detector and a risk forecasting head.<n>Experiments conducted on the S&P 500, NASDAQ Composite, and Brent Crude Oil datasets (2000-2024) demonstrate the superiority of the proposed model over benchmark methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-17T04:09:04Z) - The Sound of Risk: A Multimodal Physics-Informed Acoustic Model for Forecasting Market Volatility and Enhancing Market Interpretability [45.501025964025075]
We propose a novel framework for financial risk assessment that integrates textual sentiment with paralinguistic cues derived from executive vocal tract dynamics in earnings calls.<n>Using a dataset of 1,795 earnings calls, we construct features capturing dynamic shifts in executive affect between scripted presentation and spontaneous Q&A exchanges.<n>Our key finding reveals a pronounced divergence in predictive capacity: while multimodal features do not forecast directional stock returns, they explain up to 43.8% of the out-of-sample variance in 30-day realized volatility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-26T03:51:03Z) - Beyond Benchmarks: Dynamic, Automatic And Systematic Red-Teaming Agents For Trustworthy Medical Language Models [87.66870367661342]
Large language models (LLMs) are used in AI applications in healthcare.<n>Red-teaming framework that continuously stress-test LLMs can reveal significant weaknesses in four safety-critical domains.<n>A suite of adversarial agents is applied to autonomously mutate test cases, identify/evolve unsafe-triggering strategies, and evaluate responses.<n>Our framework delivers an evolvable, scalable, and reliable safeguard for the next generation of medical AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-30T08:44:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.