Myopia Prevention and Control 3.0: Artificial Intelligence--Driven Risk Stratification, Proactive Monitoring, and Personalized Intervention

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24187v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 09:07:07 GMT
• Title: Myopia Prevention and Control 3.0: Artificial Intelligence--Driven Risk Stratification, Proactive Monitoring, and Personalized Intervention
• Abstract summary: We review the emergence of Myopia Prevention and Control 3.0, defined by AI integration across three interconnected domains.<n>We critically evaluate evidence across each stage, discuss challenges in data quality, model validation, ethics, and equity.<n>We outline future directions including multimodal foundation models, digital twins, and causal machine learning.
• Score: 1.0582793992259394
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI), digital sensing, and ubiquitous computing has created an unprecedented opportunity to transform myopia prevention from a reactive, population-based model into a proactive, precision-driven one. Despite evidence that half the world's population will be myopic by 2050, conventional approaches---school-based vision screening (Phase 1.0) and evidence-based risk factor management (Phase 2.0)---have proven insufficient. We review the emergence of Myopia Prevention and Control 3.0, defined by AI integration across three interconnected domains forming a closed-loop pipeline: (1) AI-driven risk stratification predicting individual-level risk through machine learning on multimodal data; (2) AI-enabled proactive monitoring via wearables, smartphones, and school screening networks; and (3) AI-powered personalized intervention with closed-loop feedback. We critically evaluate evidence across each stage, discuss challenges in data quality, model validation, ethics, and equity, and outline future directions including multimodal foundation models, digital twins, and causal machine learning.

Related papers

• ERR@HRI 3.0 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Anticipation in Human-Robot Interactions [18.151307410451796]
  The third edition of the ERR@HRI Challenge (ERR@HRI 3.0) provided researchers with two complementary datasets.<n>This paper describes the datasets, tasks, baselines, and results of ERR@HRI 3.0, and discusses implications for building generalizable, context-aware, and anticipatory error detection systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T13:50:43Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• Bridging the Gap Between Ideal and Real-world Evaluation: Benchmarking AI-Generated Image Detection in Challenging Scenarios [54.07895223545793]
  This paper introduces the Real-World Robustness dataset (RRDataset) for comprehensive evaluation of detection models across three dimensions.<n>RRDataset includes high-quality images from seven major scenarios.<n>We benchmarked 17 detectors and 10 vision-language models (VLMs) on RRDataset and conducted a large-scale human study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T06:15:52Z)
• Explainable AI for Collaborative Assessment of 2D/3D Registration Quality [50.65650507103078]
  We propose the first artificial intelligence framework trained specifically for 2D/3D registration quality verification.<n>Our explainable AI (XAI) approach aims to enhance informed decision-making for human operators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T15:28:57Z)
• Computational Safety for Generative AI: A Signal Processing Perspective [65.268245109828]
  computational safety is a mathematical framework that enables the quantitative assessment, formulation, and study of safety challenges in GenAI.<n>We show how sensitivity analysis and loss landscape analysis can be used to detect malicious prompts with jailbreak attempts.<n>We discuss key open research challenges, opportunities, and the essential role of signal processing in computational AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T02:26:50Z)
• Unmasking Biases and Navigating Pitfalls in the Ophthalmic Artificial Intelligence Lifecycle: A Review [3.1929071422400446]
  This review article breaks down the AI lifecycle into seven steps. Data collection; defining the model task; data pre-processing and labeling; model development; model evaluation and validation; deployment. Finally, post-deployment evaluation, monitoring, and system recalibration and delves into the risks for harm at each step and strategies for mitigating them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T03:49:42Z)
• Safe AI for health and beyond -- Monitoring to transform a health service [51.8524501805308]
  We will assess the infrastructure required to monitor the outputs of a machine learning algorithm. We will present two scenarios with examples of monitoring and updates of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:27:45Z)
• DeepSOCIAL: Social Distancing Monitoring and Infection Risk Assessment in COVID-19 Pandemic [1.027974860479791]
  Social distancing is a recommended solution by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to minimise the spread of COVID-19 in public places. We develop a hybrid Computer Vision and YOLOv4-based Deep Neural Network model for automated people detection in the crowd using common CCTV cameras. The developed model is a generic and accurate people detection and tracking solution that can be applied in many other fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-26T16:56:57Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.