LaRec: Unleashing LLM-based Latent Reasoning for Generative Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24617v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:14:57 GMT
• Title: LaRec: Unleashing LLM-based Latent Reasoning for Generative Recommendation
• Abstract summary: latent reasoning aims to balance efficiency by thinking within a continuous latent space.<n>$LaRec$ is an efficient generative recommendation framework designed to unleash the potential of latent reasoning.<n> Experiments on multiple datasets show that $LaRec$ significantly outperforms existing baselines with comparable efficiency.
• Score: 27.643675369277858
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great promise in recommendation due to superior reasoning abilities. However, existing methods mainly rely on explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT), resulting in verbose reasoning texts and inefficient response times. latent reasoning aims to balance efficiency by thinking within a continuous latent space, yet it faces two major challenges: (1) Lack of Fine-grained Supervision: Latent reasoning relies solely on feedback from the final labels, providing sparse supervisory signals that struggle to effectively guide the optimization of multiple hidden reasoning steps. (2) Single Reasoning Path: The deterministic nature of latent reasoning impedes the exploration of users' diverse interests and preferences, thereby limiting the recommendation capabilities of LLMs. To address these issues, we propose \textbf{$LaRec$}, an efficient generative recommendation framework designed to unleash the potential of latent reasoning in LLMs. $LaRec$ consists of two core stages: First, we design Latent Pre-training that empowers LLMs with latent reasoning capabilities by providing rich supervisory signals to the latent space reasoning via step-level alignment and process direction alignment. Second, we introduce Personalized RL-tuning. Specifically, we construct a personalized Gaussian Mixture Distribution for each user based on their historical interests. By randomly sampling distinct reasoning starting points from this distribution during training, we guide the LLMs to traverse diverse reasoning paths within the latent space, enabling efficient exploration of user's multi-faceted interests. Experiments on multiple datasets show that $LaRec$ significantly outperforms existing baselines with comparable efficiency.

Related papers

• Advantage-Guided Gate: Reshaping Open-Ended Reasoning for Vision-Based Spatial Intelligence [70.8951332710039]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in complex spatial scene understanding and reasoning tasks.<n>However, their open-ended reasoning process is prone to decision errors and error accumulation, leading to instability in answer quality.<n>We propose an advantage-guided gating framework that dynamically intervenes in and corrects deviations during the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T07:46:04Z)
• Intuition-Guided Latent Reasoning for LLM-Based Recommendation [72.06271644558291]
  We propose emphIntuRec, a framework that anchors latent reasoning with emphrecommendation intuition.<n>IntuRec consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in experiments on multiple real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T03:29:48Z)
• Reinforced Efficient Reasoning via Semantically Diverse Exploration [73.41112984160992]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has proven effective in enhancing the reasoning of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose reinforced efficient reasoning via semantically diverse explorations, i.e., ROSE, for LLMs.<n>Our method incorporates a semantic-entropy-based branching strategy and an $varepsilon$-exploration mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T15:56:44Z)
• Latent Reasoning in LLMs as a Vocabulary-Space Superposition [80.01651003144282]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning abilities with chain-of-thought prompting, but explicit reasoning introduces substantial computational overhead.<n>Recent work on latent reasoning reduces this cost by reasoning in latent space without explicit supervision, but performance drops significantly.<n>To address this, we restrict the latent space to the column space of the LLM vocabulary, treating latent reasoning as a superposition over vocabulary probabilities.<n>Once latent reasoning concludes, it collapses into an eigenstate of explicit reasoning to yield the final answer.<n>Latent-SFT sets a new state of the art on GSM8k, matching explicit
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T10:51:20Z)
• Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation [9.282278040339138]
  $textbfR2Rec$ is a reasoning-enhanced recommendation framework.<n>It samples interaction chains from the user-item graph and converts them into structured interaction-of-thoughts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T14:16:44Z)
• Reinforced Latent Reasoning for LLM-based Recommendation [92.56166822197919]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities in complex problem-solving tasks.<n>Existing methods typically rely on fine-tuning with explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) data.<n>In this work, we explore an alternative approach that shifts from explicit CoT reasoning to compact, information-dense latent reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T11:03:45Z)
• SoftCoT: Soft Chain-of-Thought for Efficient Reasoning with LLMs [48.28847964704554]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve complex reasoning tasks.<n>We propose a novel approach for continuous-space reasoning that does not require modifying the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:52:29Z)
• DetermLR: Augmenting LLM-based Logical Reasoning from Indeterminacy to Determinacy [76.58614128865652]
  We propose DetermLR, a novel perspective that rethinks the reasoning process as an evolution from indeterminacy to determinacy. First, we categorize known conditions into two types: determinate and indeterminate premises This provides an oveall direction for the reasoning process and guides LLMs in converting indeterminate data into progressively determinate insights. We automate the storage and extraction of available premises and reasoning paths with reasoning memory, preserving historical reasoning details for subsequent reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T10:05:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.