What Motivates Whom? A Survey of Newcomers to OSS and Experienced OSS Practitioners

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25126v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 22:40:29 GMT
• Title: What Motivates Whom? A Survey of Newcomers to OSS and Experienced OSS Practitioners
• Abstract summary: Open source software (OSS) development continues to expand, yet software practitioners often struggle to select suitable projects.<n>This study investigates contributors' project-selection preferences in OSS projects.<n>We find that demographic factors, such as age, gender, and the OSS role they held, significantly correlate with their motivations.
• Score: 7.504007895842893
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Open source software (OSS) development continues to expand, yet software practitioners often struggle to select suitable projects, leading to inefficient onboarding and disengagement. Understanding how contributors select OSS projects is important for supporting contributors onboarding, engagement, and long-term participation within OSS communities. This study investigates contributors' project-selection preferences in OSS projects and examines how these preferences correlate with contributors' motivations and demographic backgrounds. Through an online survey of 208 practitioners, we found that demographic factors, such as age, gender, and the OSS role they held, significantly correlate with their motivations. Additionally, preferences for project characteristics such as project age, development stage, and documentation quality vary based on specific motivations. Importantly, our findings are presented through a comparative lens, analyzing the responses of newcomers to OSS and experienced OSS practitioners separately to uncover their distinct preferences. Lastly, we explore software practitioners' perspectives on how existing recommendation systems could better support project selection and align with their motivations. By disentangling the unique needs of newcomers to OSS and OSS practitioners, our findings provide insights for researchers, OSS project owners, and software practitioners to improve contributor onboarding, engagement, and retention, while also informing future project recommendation systems and improving the OSS ecosystem.

Related papers

• Beyond Code: Empirical Insights into How Team Dynamics Influence OSS Project Selection [7.504007895842893]
  Open-source software (OSS) development relies on effective collaboration among distributed contributors.<n>This study investigates how team dynamics within OSS communities influence project selection and how these preferences vary across contributors' motivations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T08:16:09Z)
• Exploring the Untapped: Student Perceptions and Participation in OSS [9.212408099557573]
  Open Source Software (OSS) projects offer valuable opportunities to train the next generation of software engineers while benefiting projects and society as a whole.<n>This study aims to investigate the relationship between students' interest in contributing to OSS and their perceptions of barriers and motivational factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T19:00:06Z)
• Personalized Generation In Large Model Era: A Survey [90.7579254803302]
  In the era of large models, content generation is gradually shifting to Personalized Generation (PGen)<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey on PGen, investigating existing research in this rapidly growing field.<n>By bridging PGen research across multiple modalities, this survey serves as a valuable resource for fostering knowledge sharing and interdisciplinary collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T13:34:19Z)
• Untold Stories: Unveiling the Scarce Contributions of UX Professionals to Usability Issue Discussions of Open Source Software Projects [11.767394881100223]
  This study identifies UX professionals' distinct approaches to raising and following up on usability issues.<n>Compared to other contributors, UX professionals addressed a broader range of usability issues, well-supported their stances, and were more factual than emotional.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T15:45:13Z)
• An Overview and Catalogue of Dependency Challenges in Open Source Software Package Registries [52.23798016734889]
  This article provides a catalogue of dependency-related challenges that come with relying on OSS packages or libraries. The catalogue is based on the scientific literature on empirical research that has been conducted to understand, quantify and overcome these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T16:20:20Z)
• CROSS: A Contributor-Project Interaction Lifecycle Model for Open Source Software [2.9631016562930546]
  Cross model is a novel contributor-project interaction lifecycle model for open source software. It explains a range of archetypal cases of contributor engagement and highlights research gaps, especially in EoS/offboarding scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T17:57:12Z)
• Unveiling Diversity: Empowering OSS Project Leaders with Community Diversity and Turnover Dashboards [51.67585198094836]
  CommunityTapestry is a dynamic real-time community dashboard. It presents key diversity and turnover signals that we identified from the literature. It helped project leaders identify areas of improvement and gave them actionable information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T22:12:57Z)
• An Exploratory Study on the Evidence of Hackathons' Role in Solving OSS Newcomers' Challenges [54.56931759953522]
  We aim to understand and discuss the challenges newcomers face when joining an OSS project. We collect evidence on how hackathons were used to address those challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T15:40:19Z)
• Assisting Human Decisions in Document Matching [52.79491990823573]
  We devise a proxy matching task that allows us to evaluate which kinds of assistive information improve decision makers' performance. We find that providing black-box model explanations reduces users' accuracy on the matching task. On the other hand, custom methods that are designed to closely attend to some task-specific desiderata are found to be effective in improving user performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T17:45:20Z)
• Leaving My Fingerprints: Motivations and Challenges of Contributing to OSS for Social Good [17.145094780239564]
  We conducted 21 semi-structured interviews with OSS for Social Good contributors. We find that the majority of contributors demonstrate a distinction between OSS4SG and OSS. OSS4SG contributors evaluate the owners of the project significantly more than OSS contributors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T21:50:11Z)
• Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support [62.61153549123407]
  We explore the use of historical expert decisions as a rich source of information that can be combined with observed outcomes to narrow the construct gap. We propose an influence function-based methodology to estimate expert consistency indirectly when each case in the data is assessed by a single expert. Our empirical evaluation, using simulations in a clinical setting and real-world data from the child welfare domain, indicates that the proposed approach successfully narrows the construct gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T05:40:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.