Beyond Epistemia: Epistemic Schizologia and Large Language Models as Techno-Semiotic Machines

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25620v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 11:57:59 GMT
• Title: Beyond Epistemia: Epistemic Schizologia and Large Language Models as Techno-Semiotic Machines
• Abstract summary: Quattrociocchi and colleagues warn that the fluent outputs of large language models may allow linguistic plausibility to substitute for epistemic evaluation.<n>This article accepts that diagnosis but challenges its explanatory framework.
• Score: 2.8769907321928283
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quattrociocchi and colleagues warn that the fluent outputs of large language models may allow linguistic plausibility to substitute for epistemic evaluation, producing the condition they call *Epistemia*: the experience of possessing knowledge without undertaking the practices through which judgment would ordinarily be warranted. This article accepts that diagnosis but challenges its explanatory framework, which compares an embodied, socially situated human knower with an isolated generative model thereby locating epistemic legitimacy in capacities internal to autonomous agents. Drawing on Carlo Sini's philosophy of practices, writing, signs, and technics, we propose instead to understand a large language model (LLM) as a *techno-semiotic machine* that automates a phase of written semiosis by producing plausible linguistic configurations from the sedimented archive of human writing. From this perspective, *Epistemia* is one consequence of a broader phenomenon that we call *epistemic schizologia*: the socio-technical cleavage between signs as linguistically accomplished expressions and signs as moments within socially embedded circuits of interpretation, evidence, criticism, verification, and responsibility. This cleavage is reinforced by *eikotic closure*, through which a plausible continuation is presented with the finality of an epistemic result, and by algorithmic authority and epistemic self-misrecognition. The relevant unit is therefore not the model alone but the complete practice in which generated inscriptions are prompted, interpreted, verified, contested, used, and made consequential. This reframing preserves the distinction between linguistic production and responsible understanding while grounding a design programme centred on inspectable genealogy, contestability, distributed responsibility, epistemic agency, and the evaluation of hybrid human--AIpractices.

Related papers

• Beyond ID Embeddings: Process-Grounded Language Modeling for Cognitive Diagnosis [77.02066500576528]
  Process-aware Language Cognitive Diagnosis (PLCD) framework uses language-derived structures as cognitive priors and response records to calibrate student posterior states.<n>PLCD not only outperforms traditional baselines in predicting student performance but also exhibits strong cognitive transfer capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-11T03:51:20Z)
• Surprisal Theory is Tautological (without Rational Grounding) [60.917028769172795]
  Surprisal theory holds that the human processing difficulty of a linguistic unit in context is an affine function of its surprisal under some language model.<n>I argue this claim is a tautology without further constraint.<n>I conclude that breaking the tautology requires a rationalist intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T17:54:37Z)
• Graph Modelling Analysis of Speech-Gesture Interaction for Aphasia Severity Estimation [0.0]
  Aphasia is an acquired language disorder caused by injury to the regions of the brain that are responsible for language.<n>Recent advancements in speech analysis focus on automated estimation of aphasia severity from spontaneous speech.<n>In this work, we propose a graph neural network-based framework for estimating aphasia severity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T14:11:36Z)
• Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligence [0.688204255655161]
  We show that the apparent alignment between human and machine outputs conceals a deeper structural mismatch in how judgments are produced.<n>We argue that LLMs are not agents but pattern-completion systems, formally describable as walks on high-dimensional graphs of linguistic transitions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T15:20:21Z)
• Generative Human-Object Interaction Detection via Differentiable Cognitive Steering of Multi-modal LLMs [85.69785384599827]
  Human-object interaction (HOI) detection aims to localize human-object pairs and the interactions between them.<n>Existing methods operate under a closed-world assumption, treating the task as a classification problem over a small, predefined verb set.<n>We propose GRASP-HO, a novel Generative Reasoning And Steerable Perception framework that reformulates HOI detection from the closed-set classification task to the open-vocabulary generation problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T14:41:50Z)
• Plausibility as Failure: How LLMs and Humans Co-Construct Epistemic Error [0.0]
  This study examines how different forms of epistemic failure emerge, are masked, and are tolerated in human AI interaction.<n>Evaluators frequently conflated criteria such as correctness, relevance, bias, groundedness, and consistency, indicating that human judgment collapses analytical distinctions into intuitives shaped by form and fluency.<n>The study provides implications for LLM assessment, digital literacy, and the design of trustworthy human AI communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T16:45:29Z)
• The Epistemic Suite: A Post-Foundational Diagnostic Methodology for Assessing AI Knowledge Claims [0.7233897166339268]
  This paper introduces the Epistemic Suite, a diagnostic methodology for surfacing the conditions under which AI outputs are produced and received.<n>Rather than determining truth or falsity, the Suite operates through twenty diagnostic lenses to reveal patterns such as confidence laundering, narrative compression, displaced authority, and temporal drift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T00:29:38Z)
• Noosemia: toward a Cognitive and Phenomenological Account of Intentionality Attribution in Human-Generative AI Interaction [4.022364531869169]
  This paper introduces and formalizes Noosemia, a novel cognitive-phenomenological pattern emerging from human interaction with generative AI systems.<n>We propose a multidisciplinary framework to explain how, under certain conditions, users attribute intentionality, agency, and even interiority to these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T17:10:08Z)
• Meta-Representational Predictive Coding: Biomimetic Self-Supervised Learning [51.22185316175418]
  We present a new form of predictive coding that we call meta-representational predictive coding (MPC)<n>MPC sidesteps the need for learning a generative model of sensory input by learning to predict representations of sensory input across parallel streams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-22T22:13:14Z)
• Understanding Epistemic Language with a Language-augmented Bayesian Theory of Mind [47.001163099930494]
  We introduce a cognitive model of epistemic language interpretation grounded in Bayesian inferences.<n>We validate our model in an experiment where participants watch an agent navigate a maze to find keys hidden in boxes needed to reach their goal, then rate sentences about the agent's beliefs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T22:29:56Z)
• Lexically-constrained Text Generation through Commonsense Knowledge Extraction and Injection [62.071938098215085]
  We focus on the Commongen benchmark, wherein the aim is to generate a plausible sentence for a given set of input concepts. We propose strategies for enhancing the semantic correctness of the generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-19T23:23:40Z)
• Mechanisms for Handling Nested Dependencies in Neural-Network Language Models and Humans [75.15855405318855]
  We studied whether a modern artificial neural network trained with "deep learning" methods mimics a central aspect of human sentence processing. Although the network was solely trained to predict the next word in a large corpus, analysis showed the emergence of specialized units that successfully handled local and long-distance syntactic agreement. We tested the model's predictions in a behavioral experiment where humans detected violations in number agreement in sentences with systematic variations in the singular/plural status of multiple nouns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T12:00:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.