Minimizing Targeted Activations: Input-Only Suppression of Evaluation-Awareness Latents in Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25907v1
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:01:48 GMT
- Title: Minimizing Targeted Activations: Input-Only Suppression of Evaluation-Awareness Latents in Large Language Models
- Abstract summary: Activation steering controls model behavior by editing internal activations at inference time.<n>We study its input-side dual: optimizing a fluent prompt so that a chosen internal latent is driven toward zero.
- Score: 0.4783156204372467
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Activation steering controls model behavior by editing internal activations at inference time. We study its input-side dual: optimizing a fluent prompt so that a chosen internal latent is driven toward zero, with no inference-time model access. Our target is an "evaluation-awareness" latent-linearly readable and steerable in recent work-whose control would threaten the validity of safety evaluations if models behave differently when they detect being tested. Adapting Fluent Dreaming / EPO with a negated feature term (GCG-style token optimization plus a self-cross-entropy fluency regularizer, swept over a fluency weight), we suppress the latent under five target constructions-a CAA direction, a subspace norm, an SAE feature, a single MLP neuron, and a behavioral logit-on Llama-3.2-3B and Llama-3.1-8B. The latent is robustly suppressible ($z\approx-7$), and a causally-validated Llama Scope SAE feature can be fully and selectively turned off. But our controls tell a cautionary story about the CAA direction: a placebo random direction is suppressed just as hard and shifts behavior just as far, and when we hold a real eval passage in context and optimize only a prefix, suppressing the eval-direction fails to reduce-and slightly increases-the model's behavioral eval judgment. Activation-readability, in short, is not behavioral controllability. We further find that a single MLP neuron is eval-correlated but not causal at both scales, and that scanning the real Pile yields a natural-text baseline competitive with the optimizer for the internal direction. A positive control validates our erasure detector, bounding an erasure-vs-rotation question earlier left open.
Related papers
- CIAware-Bench: Benchmarking Control Intervention Awareness Across Frontier LLMs [100.38986535324284]
We introduce textbfCIAware-Bench, a benchmark for measuring textbfcontrol textbfintervention (CI) awareness across frontier models.<n>CIAware-Bench tests whether models can distinguish their own trajectories from those modified by a control intervention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-09T16:24:16Z) - Activation Steering Induces Emergent Misalignment: A More Comprehensive Evaluation [74.17379276939599]
We show that activation steering can induce broad misalignment, even in the recent Qwen-3.5 series.<n>We characterize properties of AS-induced EM by analyzing key steering-specific factors, including steering magnitude, the low-rank structure of the steering subspace, and the number of epochs during steering-vector construction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-07T15:34:59Z) - Representation Without Control: Testing the Realization Effect in Language Models [0.0]
Large language models are increasingly used as behavioral simulators, but it remains unclear when their outputs reflect human-like cognitive mechanisms.<n>We study this question through the realization effect, a well-characterized finding in behavioral economics in which risk-taking differs systematically after paper versus realized gains and losses.<n>We evaluate LLM behavior at three levels: prompt-only behavioral sensitivity, linear readout of internal representations, and causal control via activation steering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-24T16:07:34Z) - Agentic Control in Variational Language Models [0.0]
We study whether a variational language model can support a minimal and measurable form of agentic control grounded in its own internal evidence.<n>Our model combines local variational hidden computation (EVE), a homeostatic latent regulator, structurally aware checkpoint retention and a calibrated uncertainty-aware controller operating on top of the retained model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T09:47:53Z) - Reliable Control-Point Selection for Steering Reasoning in Large Language Models [28.288321095634128]
Steering vectors offer a training-free mechanism for controlling reasoning behaviors in large language models.<n>However, constructing effective vectors requires identifying genuine behavioral signals in the model's hidden states.<n>We show that current methods detect these behaviors through keyword matching in chain-of-thought traces, implicitly assuming that every detected boundary encodes a genuine behavioral signal.<n>We develop a probabilistic model that formalizes intrinsic reasoning behaviors as events with context-dependent trigger probabilities, and show that unstable boundaries dilute the steering signal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T14:48:56Z) - Principled Steering via Null-space Projection for Jailbreak Defense in Vision-Language Models [71.11171576590134]
Vision-language models can be easily induced by visual jailbreak attacks to generate harmful content.<n>We propose NullSteer, a null-space projected activation defense framework.<n>We show that NullSteer significantly reduces harmful outputs under various jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T15:23:23Z) - Internalizing LLM Reasoning via Discovery and Replay of Latent Actions [4.830503861275364]
Internalization of chain-of-thought processes into hidden states has emerged as a highly efficient paradigm for scaling test-time compute.<n>We propose STIR (Self-Distilled Tools for Internal Reasoning), a framework that reformulates reasoning enhancement as a dynamic latent trajectory control problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T08:44:57Z) - Selective Steering: Norm-Preserving Control Through Discriminative Layer Selection [1.7802147489386628]
Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks that elicit harmful behaviors.<n>We propose Selective Steering, which addresses these limitations through two key innovations.<n> Experiments across nine models demonstrate that Selective Steering achieves 5.5x higher attack success rates than prior methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-27T08:56:25Z) - GrAInS: Gradient-based Attribution for Inference-Time Steering of LLMs and VLMs [56.93583799109029]
GrAInS is an inference-time steering approach that operates across both language-only and vision-language models and tasks.<n>During inference, GrAInS hidden activations at transformer layers guided by token-level attribution signals, and normalizes activations to preserve representational scale.<n>It consistently outperforms both fine-tuning and existing steering baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-24T02:34:13Z) - AdaSteer: Your Aligned LLM is Inherently an Adaptive Jailbreak Defender [99.3105257001476]
We propose AdaSteer, an adaptive activation steering method that adjusts model behavior based on input characteristics.<n>AdaSteer steers input representations along both the Rejection Direction (RD) and Harmfulness Direction (HD)<n>Our results highlight the potential of interpretable model internals for real-time, flexible safety enforcement in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-13T07:39:17Z) - SEAL: Steerable Reasoning Calibration of Large Language Models for Free [58.931194824519935]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated compelling capabilities for complex reasoning tasks via the extended chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning mechanism.<n>Recent studies reveal substantial redundancy in the CoT reasoning traces, which negatively impacts model performance.<n>We introduce SEAL, a training-free approach that seamlessly calibrates the CoT process, improving accuracy while demonstrating significant efficiency gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T02:42:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.