Evaluating Regional Bias in LLMs From Abstract Stereotype to Concrete Social Decision-Making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27022v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:20:36 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Regional Bias in LLMs From Abstract Stereotype to Concrete Social Decision-Making
• Abstract summary: Regional bias in large language models (LLMs) may shape both perceptions of regional groups and decisions about individuals from different regions.<n>We introduce Stereotypes-to-Decisions (S2D), a systematic framework evaluating regional bias from abstract stereotypes to concrete social decisions.
• Score: 14.339541636354943
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Regional bias in large language models (LLMs) may shape both perceptions of regional groups and decisions about individuals from different regions. Yet existing studies often examine these manifestations separately, leaving their structure and consequences unclear. We introduce Stereotypes-to-Decisions (S2D), a systematic framework evaluating regional bias from abstract stereotypes to concrete social decisions. Covering all 34 provincial-level administrative regions of China, S2D evaluates six LLMs using stereotype ratings of Warmth (perceived friendliness and trustworthiness) and Competence (perceived capability and intelligence), along with paired-choice tasks across Education, Occupation, and Social Interaction. Results reveal substantial regional differences in regional scores, with considerable agreement across models, especially for Competence and Occupation decisions. Furthermore, these patterns are associated with regional economic and digital development indicators and display mixed human-like stereotypes, with some regions rated highly on one dimension but poorly on the other. They also remain largely stable across Chinese and English prompts. Overall, our findings show that regional bias in LLMs is prevalent, systematic, and consequential, motivating more regionally aware evaluation and mitigation.

Related papers

• Sociodemographic Biases in Educational Counselling by Large Language Models [61.30199414932204]
  This study examines sociodemographic biases in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We evaluate responses from six LLMs answering questions about 900 vignettes describing students in diverse circumstances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T14:08:22Z)
• IndRegBias: A Dataset for Studying Indian Regional Biases in English and Code-Mixed Social Media Comments [0.1749935196721634]
  This paper focuses on creating a dataset IndRegBias, consisting of regional biases in an Indian context reflected in users' comments on popular social media platforms.<n>We carefully selected 25,000 comments appearing on various threads in Reddit and videos on YouTube discussing trending topics on regional issues in India.<n>To detect the presence of regional bias and its severity in IndRegBias, we evaluate open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) and Indic Language Models (ILMs) using zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T08:13:03Z)
• SESGO: Spanish Evaluation of Stereotypical Generative Outputs [1.1549572298362782]
  This paper addresses the critical gap in evaluating bias in multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Current evaluations remain predominantly US-English-centric, leaving potential harms in other linguistic and cultural contexts largely underexamined.<n>We introduce a novel, culturally-grounded framework for detecting social biases in instruction-tuned LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T14:04:51Z)
• FairReason: Balancing Reasoning and Social Bias in MLLMs [54.26091556079722]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) already achieve state-of-the-art results across a wide range of tasks and modalities.<n>Recent studies explore advanced prompting schemes and post-training fine-tuning to push their reasoning ability further.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T19:57:22Z)
• Unequal Opportunities: Examining the Bias in Geographical Recommendations by Large Language Models [11.585115320816257]
  This study examines the biases present in Large Language Models (LLMs) recommendations of U.S. cities and towns.<n>We focus on the consistency of LLMs responses and their tendency to over-represent or under-represent specific locations.<n>Our findings point to consistent demographic biases in these recommendations, which could perpetuate a rich-get-richer'' effect that widens existing economic disparities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T18:59:00Z)
• Unveiling Linguistic Regions in Large Language Models [49.298360366468934]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated considerable cross-lingual alignment and generalization ability. This paper conducts several investigations on the linguistic competence of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T16:56:13Z)
• Large Language Models are Geographically Biased [47.88767211956144]
  We study what Large Language Models (LLMs) know about the world we live in through the lens of geography. We show various problematic geographic biases, which we define as systemic errors in geospatial predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T02:32:09Z)
• Unveiling A Core Linguistic Region in Large Language Models [49.860260050718516]
  This paper conducts an analogical research using brain localization as a prototype. We have discovered a core region in large language models that corresponds to linguistic competence. We observe that an improvement in linguistic competence does not necessarily accompany an elevation in the model's knowledge level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T13:31:32Z)
• StereoMap: Quantifying the Awareness of Human-like Stereotypes in Large Language Models [11.218531873222398]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been observed to encode and perpetuate harmful associations present in the training data. We propose a theoretically grounded framework called StereoMap to gain insights into their perceptions of how demographic groups have been viewed by society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T17:22:30Z)
• Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Models [72.27121528451528]
  We propose a new method for exploring the social biases in Text-to-Image (TTI) systems. Our approach relies on characterizing the variation in generated images triggered by enumerating gender and ethnicity markers in the prompts. We leverage this method to analyze images generated by 3 popular TTI systems and find that while all of their outputs show correlations with US labor demographics, they also consistently under-represent marginalized identities to different extents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T19:32:49Z)
• HERB: Measuring Hierarchical Regional Bias in Pre-trained Language Models [33.0987914452712]
  Regional bias in language models (LMs) is a long-standing global discrimination problem. This paper bridges the gap by analysing the regional bias learned by the pre-trained language models. We propose a HiErarchical Regional Bias evaluation method (HERB) to quantify the bias in pre-trained LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-05T11:30:57Z)
• Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models [107.82654101403264]
  Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) can be potentially dangerous in manifesting undesirable representational biases. We propose steps towards mitigating social biases during text generation. Our empirical results and human evaluation demonstrate effectiveness in mitigating bias while retaining crucial contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T17:52:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.