Lottery Tickets Are Not Deployment Tickets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27031v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:25:19 GMT
• Title: Lottery Tickets Are Not Deployment Tickets
• Abstract summary: We study whether an accuracy-matched lottery ticket or another sparse challenger can replace an incumbent dense model without reconfiguring downstream decision logic.<n>Across experiments, sparse candidates repeatedly recover dense-reference accuracy yet remain behaviorally different.<n>In small-gap settings with fixed-threshold policy diagnostics, lottery-ticket replacement changes 7% to 10% of accept-review decisions.
• Score: 4.230349220081444
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reports on how sparsification, compression, and lottery tickets change model behavior have been mixed in the prior literature, with beneficial effects observed in some studies and adverse effects in others. Moreover, prior work has not considered actual deployment conditions, where decision logic is already fixed for the incumbent. To assess these mixed findings from a practical standpoint, we study the production-replacement question at the deployment level, namely whether an accuracy-matched lottery ticket or another sparse challenger can replace an incumbent dense model without reconfiguring downstream decision logic. We therefore audit a broad, protocol-specific panel of deployment-relevant behaviors spanning calibration, OOD response, class-level reliability, representations, and downstream policy decisions, and summarize clean-accuracy-excluded deviations with a behavioral-compatibility distance. Across extensive experiments, sparse candidates repeatedly recover dense-reference accuracy yet remain behaviorally different; in several study-band-matched settings, LTs also show lower corruption accuracy. In small-gap settings with fixed-threshold policy diagnostics, lottery-ticket replacement changes 7% to 10% of accept--review decisions. This churn creates precisely the burden that drop-in replacement is meant to avoid: reconfiguring and revalidating downstream decision logic. These findings establish the limits of clean-accuracy certification: Establishing compatibility with a fixed incumbent is distinct from attributing churn uniquely to sparsity or treating every measured deviation as harmful. Our theory explains the routing result: Even exact pointwise top-1 agreement cannot bound fixed-threshold decision changes, and small confidence shifts near the operating boundary can generate first-order routing churn.

Related papers

• Unmasking Removal-Budget Confounding: A Matched Operating-Point Evaluation Framework for Adaptive Data Cleaning [0.0]
  We introduce an operating-point-aware evaluation framework that evaluates methods using matched-budget and matched-recall controls.<n>We test this framework on a multi-cue adaptive cleaner redesign featuring a reweighted learning-difficulty cue, an auxiliary Euclidean-distance cue, and increased partition granularity.<n>False-positive decomposition reveals that clean-but-difficult samples primarily drive error counts at low corruption rates, become threshold-dependent at moderate corruption, and contribute negligibly under severe corruption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T18:50:35Z)
• Conformal Changepoint Localization and Root Cause Analysis with Corrupted Observations [55.76952683833966]
  This paper proposes weighted CONCH (W-CONCH) and weighted CROC (W-CROC) to reduce confidence set size when data may be corrupted.<n>Experiments on image-based and real-world changepoint and root-cause benchmarks show that uncertainty-based weighting substantially reduces confidence set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T05:16:59Z)
• Budgeted Act-or-Defer Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation with Local Reliability Bounds [8.682220907885714]
  We formulate this as budgeted act-or-defer decision making.<n>System maps the debate prefix to a low-dimensional state.<n>It acts only when the bound exceeds a user-specified reliability threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-28T23:46:56Z)
• How Useful is Causal Invariance for Domain Adaptation in Finite-Sample Settings? [58.740078141879984]
  Machine learning models often degrade when they are deployed on a target distribution that differs from the source distributions they were trained on.<n>Recent work in causality-based domain generalization has shown how shared causal structure can induce invariant predictors.<n>In this paper, we study when full or partial causal knowledge can provably improve supervised domain adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T21:07:49Z)
• Proper Scoring Rules for Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [0.038379177968040606]
  Trajectory Proper Score (TPS) is a predictor-agnostic family of strictly proper trajectory-level scoring rules.<n>Trajectory ECE is resolution-blind, while scalarized Trajectory Brier elicits only the collapsed scalar, not the full trace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T22:22:00Z)
• \mathsf{VISTA}: Decentralized Machine Learning in Adversary Dominated Environments [21.69919643934826]
  Decentralized machine learning often relies on outsourcing computations, such as evaluations, to untrusted worker nodes.<n>We study this adversary-dominated setting through an incentive-oriented framework in which reports are accepted and rewarded only when they are mutually consistent up to a threshold.<n>We propose mathsfVISTA, an adaptive algorithm that tunes the acceptance threshold using the optimization history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T15:07:15Z)
• Correction and Corruption: A Two-Rate View of Error Flow in LLM Protocols [51.56484100374058]
  We propose a paired-outcome measurement interface for auditing a single protocol step on exact-match tasks.<n>For each instance, the interface records a baseline correctness bit and a post-step correctness bit.<n>These rates predict accuracy changes and define a reusable empirical interface testable across seeds, mixtures, and pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T13:25:40Z)
• Correct Answers from Sound Reasoning: Verifiable Process Supervision for Language Models [94.68358825189738]
  We propose a post-training framework for verifiable domains that jointly optimize prediction accuracy and reasoning quality.<n>We evaluate VPS on chess, a controlled testbed where reasoning steps can be deterministically verified against engine signals.<n>VPS preserves accuracy while significantly improving reasoning quality, reducing win-rate error by up to 30% and restoring consistency to near saturation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T15:19:46Z)
• Partial Causal Structure Learning for Valid Selective Conformal Inference under Interventions [0.0]
  In genomics experiments, exchangeability often holds only within subsets of interventions that leave a target variable "unaffected"<n>Our contributions are: (i) a contamination-robust conformal coverage theorem that quantifies how misclassification of "unaffected" calibration examples degrades coverage via an explicit function $g(,n)$ of the contamination fraction and calibration set size; and (ii) a task-driven partial causal learning formulation that estimates only the binary descendant indicators $Z_a,i=mathbf1iinmathrmdesc(a)$ needed
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T18:58:22Z)
• Conformal Tradeoffs: Guarantees Beyond Coverage [0.02648566468224904]
  Deployed conformal predictors are long-lived decision infrastructure operating over finite operational windows.<n> Marginal coverage does not determine deployment-facing quantities.<n>We provide a framework for operational certification and planning beyond coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T07:58:25Z)
• COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
  COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z)
• When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice? [69.28314307469381]
  Cascades are a classical strategy to enable inference cost to vary adaptively across samples. A deferral rule determines whether to invoke the next classifier in the sequence, or to terminate prediction. Despite being oblivious to the structure of the cascade, confidence-based deferral often works remarkably well in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T04:13:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.