SCOPE: Synthetic Conditional Objectives for Policy Evolution in Black-Box Combinatorial Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27630v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 03:42:18 GMT
• Title: SCOPE: Synthetic Conditional Objectives for Policy Evolution in Black-Box Combinatorial Optimization
• Abstract summary: We introduce SCOPE, a framework for synthetic Conditional Objectives for Policy Evolution.<n>SCOPE learns a set of synthetic objectives conditioned on the accumulated search history.<n>We show that SCOPE consistently improves black-box search performance under limited evaluation budgets.
• Score: 8.10827298136302
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Black-box combinatorial optimization requires systematically identifying high-quality solutions under a limited evaluation budget, yet the unknown objective function provides little guidance for deciding where the search should explore next. We introduce SCOPE, a general framework for Synthetic Conditional Objectives for Policy Evolution in Black-Box Combinatorial Optimization. Rather than directly optimizing the inaccessible objective, SCOPE learns a set of synthetic objectives conditioned on the accumulated search history, where each objective is designed to expose a distinct and potentially useful preference over candidate solutions. These objectives are then used to evolve search policies that generate diverse candidates, whose true quality is subsequently assessed through black-box evaluations. The outer loop adaptively updates and selects synthetic objectives according to how effectively their induced policies discover promising regions. In contrast, the inner loop returns a portfolio of top-performing policies to reduce the risk of relying on a single surrogate preference. This formulation reframes objective design as a mechanism for guiding policy exploration, enabling the search process to exploit observed evidence while maintaining structured diversity across discrete solution spaces. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmark problems demonstrate that SCOPE consistently improves black-box search performance under limited evaluation budgets and generalizes well across diverse combinatorial structures.

Related papers

• Diversity-Driven Offline Multi-Objective Optimization via Nested Pareto Set Learning [11.1141573484419]
  Multi-objective optimization (MOO) has emerged as a powerful approach to solving complex optimization problems involving multiple objectives.<n>This paper proposes Diversity-driven Offline Multi-Objective Optimization (DOMOO), which aims to find out a diverse and high-quality set of solutions.<n>Experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks show that DOMOO achieves the best average rank across tasks in both convergence and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-13T05:09:25Z)
• Multi-Agent LLMs for Adaptive Acquisition in Bayesian Optimization [2.6954666679827137]
  We show how Large Language Models (LLMs) construct and adapt exploration-exploitation strategies.<n>We propose a multi-agent framework that decomposes exploration-exploitation control into strategic policy mediation and tactical candidate generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T20:05:30Z)
• Neural Nonmyopic Bayesian Optimization in Dynamic Cost Settings [73.44599934855067]
  LookaHES is a nonmyopic BO framework designed for dynamic, history-dependent cost environments.<n>LookaHES combines a multi-step variant of $H$-Entropy Search with pathwise sampling and neural policy optimization.<n>Our innovation is the integration of neural policies, including large language models, to effectively navigate structured, domain-specific action spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T09:49:45Z)
• Towards Context-aware Reasoning-enhanced Generative Searching in E-commerce [61.03081096959132]
  We propose a context-aware reasoning-enhanced generative search framework for better textbfunderstanding the complicated context.<n>Our approach achieves superior performance compared with strong baselines, validating its effectiveness for search-based recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T16:46:11Z)
• Bounded Rationality for LLMs: Satisficing Alignment at Inference-Time [52.230936493691985]
  We propose SITAlign, an inference framework that addresses the multifaceted nature of alignment by maximizing a primary objective while satisfying threshold-based constraints on secondary criteria.<n>We provide theoretical insights by deriving sub-optimality bounds of our satisficing based inference alignment approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:56:05Z)
• Illuminating the Diversity-Fitness Trade-Off in Black-Box Optimization [9.838618121102053]
  In real-world applications, users often favor structurally diverse design choices over one high-quality solution.<n>This paper considers the problem of identifying a fixed number of solutions with a pairwise distance above a specified threshold.<n>We analyze how this trade-off depends on the properties of the underlying optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T09:55:55Z)
• An Efficient Approach for Solving Expensive Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems [0.0]
  An efficient probabilistic selection based constrained multi-objective EA is proposed, referred to as PSCMOEA. It comprises novel elements such as (a) an adaptive search bound identification scheme based on the feasibility and convergence status of evaluated solutions. Numerical experiments are conducted on an extensive range of challenging constrained problems using low evaluation budgets to simulate ECMOPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T02:32:58Z)
• Acceleration in Policy Optimization [50.323182853069184]
  We work towards a unifying paradigm for accelerating policy optimization methods in reinforcement learning (RL) by integrating foresight in the policy improvement step via optimistic and adaptive updates. We define optimism as predictive modelling of the future behavior of a policy, and adaptivity as taking immediate and anticipatory corrective actions to mitigate errors from overshooting predictions or delayed responses to change. We design an optimistic policy gradient algorithm, adaptive via meta-gradient learning, and empirically highlight several design choices pertaining to acceleration, in an illustrative task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T15:50:57Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Search Framework for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization [40.40632890861706]
  We consider the problem of multi-objective (MO) blackbox optimization using expensive function evaluations. We propose a novel uncertainty-aware search framework referred to as USeMO to efficiently select the sequence of inputs for evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T16:50:48Z)
• Learning Proximal Operators to Discover Multiple Optima [66.98045013486794]
  We present an end-to-end method to learn the proximal operator across non-family problems. We show that for weakly-ized objectives and under mild conditions, the method converges globally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T05:53:28Z)
• Local policy search with Bayesian optimization [73.0364959221845]
  Reinforcement learning aims to find an optimal policy by interaction with an environment. Policy gradients for local search are often obtained from random perturbations. We develop an algorithm utilizing a probabilistic model of the objective function and its gradient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-22T16:07:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.