Security of World-Model-Based Embodied AI: A Lifecycle of Threats, Defenses, and Evaluation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28226v1
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 13:58:33 GMT
- Title: Security of World-Model-Based Embodied AI: A Lifecycle of Threats, Defenses, and Evaluation
- Abstract summary: This survey traces threats across their entire lifecycle-from data construction and representation learning, through state grounding and imagination, to trajectory evaluation, execution, and long-term adaptation via memory and tools.<n>We show that familiar attack families: poisoning, backdoors, adversarial examples, sensor spoofing, prompt injection, trajectory manipulation, and supply-chain attacks take on distinct meanings when they corrupt world states, learned dynamics, affordance estimates, or safety costs.<n>The survey offers a lifecycle taxonomy, maps existing attacks to world-model security properties, outlines evaluation protocols for safety failures, and structures defenses across provenance, robust grounding, uncertainty-
- Score: 15.943456899620053
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: World models give embodied AI a predictive core: they compress observations into states, simulate action-conditioned futures, and enable planning beyond reactive control. This predictive layer, however, opens a new security boundary-compromise can propagate from data, sensors, prompts, or feedback into physical action. Rather than treating world models as an isolated component, this survey traces threats across their entire lifecycle-from data construction and representation learning, through state grounding and imagination, to trajectory evaluation, execution, and long-term adaptation via memory and tools. We show that familiar attack families: poisoning, backdoors, adversarial examples, sensor spoofing, prompt injection, trajectory manipulation, and supply-chain attacks take on distinct meanings when they corrupt world states, learned dynamics, affordance estimates, or safety costs. We also highlight a duality: world models can serve as runtime safety shields, yet when compromised or over-trusted they generate predictive safety illusions. The survey offers a lifecycle taxonomy, maps existing attacks to world-model security properties, outlines evaluation protocols for safety failures, and structures defenses across provenance, robust grounding, uncertainty-aware prediction, trajectory gating, feedback auditing, and deployment assurance.
Related papers
- World Models for Embodied Intelligence: From Plausible to Controllable to Actionable [100.13060753774657]
World models connect perception and decision-making in embodied intelligence by maintaining hidden state, anticipating consequences, comparing interventions, and adapting when execution departs from expectations.<n>This raises a central question: which predictive capabilities improve behavior?<n>We introduce three progressively stronger capability levels: Plausible models preserve task-relevant temporal, geometric, or physical structure; Controllable models additionally predict how interventions alter that structure; and Actionable models translate predictions into measurable gains in planning, action, learning, evaluation, verification, recovery, or data selection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-15T06:22:42Z) - Rethinking World Models for Safety-Critical Embodied Systems [3.802367963338718]
This perspective identifies three structural mismatches in current world modeling.<n>We propose the Risk-Informed World Model (RIWM) as a decision-centric research direction for safety-critical embodied systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-03T12:44:44Z) - Security in the Fine-Tuning Lifecycle of Large Language Models: Threats, Defenses,Evaluation, and Future Directions [21.047807094226986]
This paper presents a systematic survey of Large Language Models fine-tuning security.<n>It establishes a lifecycle-based framework for comparing attacks and defenses.<n>We identify key open problems (configuration-robust defense, cross-phase defense composition, and embedding-space attacks beyond behavioral assumptions) and propose concrete future research directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-24T13:34:47Z) - From Stealthy Data Fabrication to Unsafe Driving: Realistic Scenario Attacks on Collaborative Perception [7.889284710970368]
Collaborative perception allows connected and autonomous vehicles to improve perception by sharing sensory data.<n>Prior work shows that attackers can spoof or remove objects by fabricating shared data, yet the practicality of such attacks in real-world driving remains unclear.<n>We present a stealthy, scenario-realistic data fabrication attack that induces unsafe driving behaviors through end-to-end system effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-02T07:21:22Z) - Vision-Language-Action Safety: Threats, Challenges, Evaluations, and Mechanisms [61.29786895012393]
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are emerging as a unified substrate for embodied intelligence.<n>This survey provides a unified and up-to-date overview of safety in Vision-Language-Action models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-26T15:58:19Z) - Safety, Security, and Cognitive Risks in World Models [0.0]
World models are learned internal simulators of environment dynamics.<n>World models are rapidly becoming foundational to autonomous decision-making in robotics, autonomous vehicles, and agentic AI.<n>This paper surveys the world model landscape; introduces formal definitions of trajectory persistence and representational risk; presents a five-profile attacker taxonomy.<n>We provide an empirical proof-of-concept demonstrating trajectory-persistent adversarial attacks on a GRU-based RSSM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T19:57:33Z) - Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses [168.50301366360344]
Embodied Artificial Intelligence (Embodied AI) integrates perception, cognition, planning, and interaction into agents that operate in safety-critical environments.<n>Unlike digital AI systems, embodied agents must act under uncertain sensing, incomplete knowledge, and dynamic human-robot interactions.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive review of safety research in embodied AI, examining attacks and defenses across the full embodied pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-28T13:21:44Z) - WorldLens: Full-Spectrum Evaluations of Driving World Models in Real World [100.68103378427567]
Generative world models are reshaping embodied AI, enabling agents to synthesize realistic 4D driving environments that look convincing but often fail physically or behaviorally.<n>We introduce WorldLens, a full-spectrum benchmark evaluating how well a model builds, understands, and behaves within its generated world.<n>We further construct WorldLens-26K, a large-scale dataset of human-annotated videos with numerical scores and textual rationales, and develop WorldLens-Agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-11T18:59:58Z) - Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model and Agent Safety [296.5392512998251]
We present a comprehensive taxonomy of safety threats to large models, including adversarial attacks, data poisoning, backdoor attacks, jailbreak and prompt injection attacks, energy-latency attacks, data and model extraction attacks, and emerging agent-specific threats.<n>We identify and discuss the open challenges in large model safety, emphasizing the need for comprehensive safety evaluations, scalable and effective defense mechanisms, and sustainable data practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-02T05:14:22Z) - Certifiers Make Neural Networks Vulnerable to Availability Attacks [70.69104148250614]
We show for the first time that fallback strategies can be deliberately triggered by an adversary.
In addition to naturally occurring abstains for some inputs and perturbations, the adversary can use training-time attacks to deliberately trigger the fallback.
We design two novel availability attacks, which show the practical relevance of these threats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-25T15:49:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.