Harnessing the Wisdom of LLM Crowds through Complementarity-Driven Iterative Collaboration
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29087v1
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 07:13:59 GMT
- Title: Harnessing the Wisdom of LLM Crowds through Complementarity-Driven Iterative Collaboration
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings, yet individual models remain bounded by model-specific capability limitations.<n>We propose WILC (Wisdom Integration of LLM Crowds), a framework grounded in two design principles.<n>WilC matches the average benchmark performance of GPT-5.2 at roughly 7 times lower estimated per-Query cost.
- Score: 7.252833168419753
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings, yet individual models remain bounded by model-specific capability limitations. These heterogeneous boundaries pose a deployment challenge, but also create an opportunity: strategically coordinating multiple LLMs may unlock collective intelligence exceeding any single model. Existing approaches fix how models are combined in advance, overlooking the dynamic, state-dependent role of complementarity in complex problem solving. Drawing on the wisdom-of-crowds paradigm, we reconceptualize collective LLM intelligence as relay-style complementarity: a sequential process in which each successor model is selected to address the specific bottleneck identified in its predecessor's output. To operationalize this, we propose WILC (Wisdom Integration of LLM Crowds), a framework grounded in two design principles. First, iterative reflection-and-refinement establishes a state-preserving workflow through which models diagnose and refine prior outputs. Second, complementarity-driven model selection governs transitions via a dual-gate mechanism: prospective complementarity fit (PCF) identifies the worker most suited to the current bottleneck, while posterior complementarity gain (PCG) evaluates whether the selected transition improves the evolving solution. Experiments across four diverse benchmarks show that WILC outperforms existing approaches, including single-model self-refinement, ensemble methods, and query-routing methods. Under standardized pricing assumptions, WILC matches the average benchmark performance of GPT-5.2 at roughly 7 times lower estimated per-query cost, while facilitating data sovereignty through self-hosted deployment. This study extends wisdom-of-crowds theory from static aggregation to sequential AI complementarity and provides transferable design principles for multi-AI coordination.
Related papers
- Revitalizing the Beginning: Avoiding Storage Dependency for Model Merging in Continual Learning [57.10440766103372]
Trajectory Regularized Merging (TRM) is a framework that reformulates the merging phase as an optimization process within an augmented trajectory subspace.<n>Our framework integrates three synergistic objectives including task alignment, prediction consistency, and gradient responsiveness to concurrently preserve merged model's historical stability and re-activate optimization dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T14:07:32Z) - Fine-Grained Model Merging via Modular Expert Recombination [33.253051407398836]
We propose MERGE, a method that enables component-wise model merging and input-aware, on-demand module recombination at inference.<n> MERGE formulates component-wise merging as a bi-objective optimization problem that balances cross-task performance and storage efficiency.<n>We show that MERGE consistently outperforms strong baselines and generalizes effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T09:55:56Z) - PathWise: Planning through World Model for Automated Heuristic Design via Self-Evolving LLMs [16.59846708454225]
We propose a novel multi-agent reasoning framework, referred to as Planning through World Model for Automated Heuristic Design via Self-Evolving LLMs (PathWise)<n>PathWise formulates a sequential decision process over an entailment graph serving as a compact, stateful memory of the search trajectory.<n> Experiments across diverse COPs show that PathWise converges faster to better generalizes, generalizes across different LLM backbones, and scales to larger problem sizes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-28T12:34:50Z) - Offline Multi-Task Multi-Objective Data-Driven Evolutionary Algorithm with Language Surrogate Model and Implicit Q-Learning [16.52427396199173]
We propose Q-MetaSur as a plug-and-play surrogate modeling scheme.<n>We consider multi-task-multi-objective optimization(MTMOO) in offline setting.<n>We show that Q-MetaSur outperforms representative surrogate baselines in objective approximation accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-17T07:30:11Z) - UME-R1: Exploring Reasoning-Driven Generative Multimodal Embeddings [70.60608084375691]
We pioneer the exploration of generative embeddings, unifying embedding tasks within a generative paradigm.<n>We propose UME-R1, a universal multimodal embedding framework consisting of a two-stage training strategy.<n> evaluated on the MMEB-V2 benchmark across 78 tasks spanning video, image, and visual documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-01T05:04:23Z) - Merge and Guide: Unifying Model Merging and Guided Decoding for Controllable Multi-Objective Generation [49.98025799046136]
We introduce Merge-And-GuidE, a two-stage framework that leverages model merging for guided decoding.<n>In Stage 1, MAGE resolves a compatibility problem between the guidance and base models.<n>In Stage 2, we merge explicit and implicit value models into a unified guidance proxy, which then steers the decoding of the base model from Stage 1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-04T11:10:07Z) - StepORLM: A Self-Evolving Framework With Generative Process Supervision For Operations Research Language Models [18.500046072165254]
We introduce StepORLM, a novel self-evolving framework with generative process supervision.<n>At its core, StepORLM features a co-evolutionary loop where a policy model and a generative process reward model (GenPRM) iteratively improve on each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T16:39:10Z) - The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey [103.32591749156416]
The emergence of agentic reinforcement learning (Agentic RL) marks a paradigm shift from conventional reinforcement learning applied to large language models (LLM RL)<n>This survey formalizes this conceptual shift by contrasting the degenerate single-step Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) of LLM-RL with the temporally extended, partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) that define Agentic RL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-02T17:46:26Z) - LLM4CMO: Large Language Model-aided Algorithm Design for Constrained Multiobjective Optimization [54.35609820607923]
Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for assisting with algorithm design.<n>We propose LLM4CMO, a novel CMOEA based on a dual-population, two-stage framework.<n>LLMs can serve as efficient co-designers in the development of complex evolutionary optimization algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-16T02:00:57Z) - Leveraging Importance Sampling to Detach Alignment Modules from Large Language Models [48.15777554876988]
Traditional alignment methods often require retraining large pretrained models.<n>We propose a novel textitResidual Alignment Model (textitRAM) that formalizes the alignment process as a type of importance sampling.<n>We develop a resampling algorithm with iterative token-level decoding to address the common first-token latency issue in comparable methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T08:53:02Z) - Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models.<n>Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining.<n>We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.