XL-DocBench: Benchmarking Evidence-Grounded Extra-Long Document Understanding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00036v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:38:24 GMT
• Title: XL-DocBench: Benchmarking Evidence-Grounded Extra-Long Document Understanding
• Abstract summary: XL-DocBench is a fully human-verified benchmark for extra-long document understanding.<n>1,519 retained questions from six professional domains and contexts up to 2,303 pages.<n>Each question has one of twelve reasoning labels, expert-annotated evidence pages, a typed verification rule, and an answer format.
• Score: 66.6175918865927
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Real-world document tasks often ask professionals to answer questions from annual reports, regulations, clinical guidelines, and technical manuals that span hundreds or thousands of pages. Some questions also require comparing related reports. Reliable long-document understanding is therefore a prerequisite for using LLMs in compliance, clinical, financial, and engineering workflows, where decisions must be traceable to specific evidence pages and the cost of an unsupported answer is high -- yet most existing benchmarks still measure short-context or single-page QA. We introduce XL-DocBench, a fully human-verified benchmark for extra-long document understanding, with 1,519 retained questions from six professional domains and contexts up to 2,303 pages. XL-DocBench goes beyond page-level lookup. 1,103 examples (72.6\%) use multiple evidence pages. The final set also includes 556 questions (36.6\%) that use tables, charts, or figures, and 165 questions (10.9\%) that require evidence from multiple documents. Each question has one of twelve reasoning labels, expert-annotated evidence pages, a typed verification rule, and an answer format, including 218 None-answer cases. We build the benchmark with a tree-guided synthesis pipeline followed by artifact filters and full verification by 194 human experts. By coupling extra-long professional contexts with page-level evidence and typed rules, XL-DocBench fills a gap left by prior single-page, short multi-page, or text-only long-context benchmarks, and lets future work attribute system failures to retrieval, evidence use, or rule following rather than to a single leaderboard score. The results show that current systems still struggle with long contexts, multi-page evidence, and structured reasoning over professional documents.

Related papers

• Trace Only What You Need: Structure-Aware On-Demand Hypergraph Memory for Long-Document Question Answering [11.17007249581283]
  Long-document question answering requires large language models to reason over evidence scattered across lengthy documents.<n>Existing structured RAG methods face three limitations: costly query-agnostic knowledge organization, insufficient use of original document structure, and no reuse of historical reasoning experience.<n>We propose DocTrace, a multi-agent RAG framework for long-document QA that supports query-triggered knowledge organization, document-structure-aware and experience-guided reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T14:29:06Z)
• Dr. DocBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Expert-Level and Difficult Document Parsing [53.41293908252118]
  We introduce Dr. DocBench, a difficulty-aware benchmark for expert-level document parsing.<n>Dr. DocBench spans 52 BISAC domains and selects documents through failure-based sampling.<n>It contains 4,514 annotated pages from long documents averaging around 100 pages, with 65k high-quality annotations for layout, reading order, hierarchical relations, and domain-specific visual contents.<n>Our analysis reveals substantial failures across subjects, content types, and structural attributes, highlighting Dr. DocBench as a comprehensive testbed for diagnosing and advancing document intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-31T18:35:30Z)
• Navigating Large-Scale Document Collections: MuDABench for Multi-Document Analytical QA [25.155696504567718]
  This paper introduces the task of analytical question answering over large, semi-structured document collections.<n>We present MuDABench, a benchmark for multi-document analytical QA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T05:28:51Z)
• Doc-V*:Coarse-to-Fine Interactive Visual Reasoning for Multi-Page Document VQA [71.42483000929614]
  Multi-page Document Visual Question Answering requires reasoning over semantics, layouts, and visual elements in long, visually dense documents.<n>We propose Doc-$V*$, an textbfOCR-free agentic framework that casts multi-page DocVQA as sequential evidence aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T11:12:27Z)
• MMDocIR: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval for Long Documents [44.02536756069517]
  This work introduces a new benchmark, named MMDocIR, that encompasses two distinct tasks: page-level and layout-level retrieval.<n>The MMDocIR benchmark comprises a rich dataset featuring 1,685 questions annotated by experts and 173,843 questions with bootstrapped labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T14:30:13Z)
• MMLongBench-Doc: Benchmarking Long-context Document Understanding with Visualizations [105.10376440302076]
  This work presents MMLongBench-Doc, a long-context, multi-modal benchmark comprising 1,062 expert-annotated questions. It is constructed upon 130 lengthy PDF-formatted documents with an average of 49.4 pages and 20,971 textual tokens. Experiments on 14 LVLMs demonstrate that long-context DU greatly challenges current models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:59:26Z)
• PDFTriage: Question Answering over Long, Structured Documents [60.96667912964659]
  Representing structured documents as plain text is incongruous with the user's mental model of these documents with rich structure. We propose PDFTriage that enables models to retrieve the context based on either structure or content. Our benchmark dataset consists of 900+ human-generated questions over 80 structured documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T04:29:05Z)
• End-to-End Multihop Retrieval for Compositional Question Answering over Long Documents [93.55268936974971]
  We propose a multi-hop retrieval method, DocHopper, to answer compositional questions over long documents. At each step, DocHopper retrieves a paragraph or sentence embedding from the document, mixes the retrieved result with the query, and updates the query for the next step. We demonstrate that utilizing document structure in this was can largely improve question-answering and retrieval performance on long documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T03:13:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.