Reflection, Education, Consistency: Towards Best Ethics Practices At Security And Privacy Conferences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00282v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 20:41:15 GMT
• Title: Reflection, Education, Consistency: Towards Best Ethics Practices At Security And Privacy Conferences
• Abstract summary: Research ethics is a controversial and emotionally charged topic in the security and privacy community.<n>Leading conferences have introduced mandatory ethics sections, with mixed reactions within the community.<n>Interviewees mentioned challenges with the complexity of ethics policies and the lack of consistency across different conferences.
• Score: 13.318173470516115
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Research ethics is a controversial and emotionally charged topic in the security and privacy community, sparking discussions at conferences and on social media. In recent years, some of the leading conferences have introduced interventions such as mandatory ethics sections, with mixed reactions within the community. Program committee chairs and steering committees increasingly emphasize ethics, yet there is limited empirical validation on ethics procedures and interventions, as well as no explicitly communicated goals. To support a shared understanding in our community and guide informed decisions at the conference level, we examined past ethics policies at the top-four conferences and conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with senior and junior (n=20) community members, including some (former) chairs of program and research ethics committees. In these, we explored reasons for and goals of ethics procedures and discussed existing ethics interventions as well as possible new approaches proposed by our team. While the community appears to be evolving toward the identified goals, i.e., raising ethical awareness and preventing the publication of unethical work, we identified the lack of ethical education within the community itself as a major obstacle to further progress on this matter. Ethical education is often passed to the universities. Interviewees also mentioned challenges with the complexity of ethics policies and the lack of consistency across different conferences, as well as policies changing year-to-year. Several participants warned that over-regulation may lead to backlash, encouraging mere compliance, such as people turning to LLMs for ethics sections rather than undertaking in-depth consideration. In response, we suggest a coordinated, community-wide ethics steering effort and take a first step by introducing an open ethics wiki.

Related papers

• Mirror: A Multi-Agent System for AI-Assisted Ethics Review [104.3684024153469]
  Mirror is an agentic framework for AI-assisted ethical review.<n>It integrates ethical reasoning, structured rule interpretation, and multi-agent deliberation within a unified architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T03:38:55Z)
• The Only Way is Ethics: A Guide to Ethical Research with Large Language Models [53.316174782223115]
  'LLM Ethics Whitepaper' is an open resource for NLP practitioners and those tasked with evaluating the ethical implications of others' work.<n>Our goal is to translate ethics literature into concrete recommendations and provocations for thinking with clear first steps.<n>'LLM Ethics Whitepaper' distils a thorough literature review into clear Do's and Don'ts, which we present also in this paper.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T16:14:43Z)
• Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [51.85131234265026]
  I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.<n>I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
• The overlooked need for Ethics in Complexity Science: Why it matters [0.0]
  We highlight the critical absence of formal guidelines, dedicated ethical committees, and widespread discussions on ethics within the complexity science community. Our recommendations include (i) initiating supportive mechanisms to develop ethical guidelines specific to complex systems research, (ii) creating open-access resources, and (iii) fostering inclusive dialogues. By initiating this dialogue, we aim to encourage a necessary shift in how ethics is integrated into complexity research, positioning the field to address contemporary challenges more effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T15:48:24Z)
• Frameworking for a Community-led Feminist Ethics [9.89126103505209]
  This paper introduces a relational perspective on ethics within the context of Feminist Digital Civics and community-led design. We advocate for a community-led, processual approach to ethics, acknowledging power dynamics and local contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T16:07:25Z)
• Unpacking the Ethical Value Alignment in Big Models [46.560886177083084]
  This paper provides an overview of the risks and challenges associated with big models, surveys existing AI ethics guidelines, and examines the ethical implications arising from the limitations of these models. We introduce a novel conceptual paradigm for aligning the ethical values of big models and discuss promising research directions for alignment criteria, evaluation, and method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T16:45:40Z)
• Introduction to ethics in the age of digital communication [1.922823221013346]
  This article serves as an introduction to ethics in the field of digital communication. It gives a brief overview of applied ethics as a practical sub-field of ethics. The article also discusses the ways in which the nature of ethics in the field of communication has been changing, and the impact of emerging technology on these changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T09:03:15Z)
• Walking the Walk of AI Ethics: Organizational Challenges and the Individualization of Risk among Ethics Entrepreneurs [0.0]
  We find that workers experience an environment where policies, practices, and outcomes are decoupled. We analyze AI ethics workers as ethics entrepreneurs who work to institutionalize new ethics-related practices within organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T16:11:24Z)
• AiSocrates: Towards Answering Ethical Quandary Questions [51.53350252548668]
  AiSocrates is a system for deliberative exchange of different perspectives to an ethical quandary. We show that AiSocrates generates promising answers to ethical quandary questions with multiple perspectives. We argue that AiSocrates is a promising step toward developing an NLP system that incorporates human values explicitly by prompt instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-12T09:52:59Z)
• Ethics of AI: A Systematic Literature Review of Principles and Challenges [3.7129018407842445]
  Transparency, privacy, accountability and fairness are identified as the most common AI ethics principles. Lack of ethical knowledge and vague principles are reported as the significant challenges for considering ethics in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-12T15:33:43Z)
• Case Study: Deontological Ethics in NLP [119.53038547411062]
  We study one ethical theory, namely deontological ethics, from the perspective of NLP. In particular, we focus on the generalization principle and the respect for autonomy through informed consent. We provide four case studies to demonstrate how these principles can be used with NLP systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T16:04:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.