When Prompts Control Robots: Prompt Injection Attacks in Multi-Agent Robotic Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00747v2
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:20:03 GMT
- Title: When Prompts Control Robots: Prompt Injection Attacks in Multi-Agent Robotic Systems
- Abstract summary: Large language models are increasingly integrated into autonomous robotic systems for task planning and control.<n>This integration exposes them to prompt injection attacks that can lead to unsafe decisions and physical harm.<n>In this paper, we evaluate prompt injection attacks against an LLM-based multi-agent robotic system.
- Score: 0.5161531917413708
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models are increasingly integrated into autonomous robotic systems for task planning and control, but this integration exposes them to prompt injection attacks that can lead to unsafe decisions and physical harm. Multi-agent settings increase the risks through cross-agent contamination and broader attack surfaces. In this paper, we evaluate prompt injection attacks against an LLM-based multi-agent robotic system, considering both direct injections into task instructions and indirect injections through perception modules. In our experiments across varying attack-goal complexities and injection strategies in both single-agent and multi-agent settings, we show that prompt injection can induce adversarial actions while reducing task completion. We find that attacks can propagate from one agent to others through shared prompt structures, with impacts varying depending on prompt composition and the targeted agent. We further analyze how architectural changes affect LLM queries and, consequently, the attack success. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that systematically investigates prompt injection attacks in a multi-agent LLM-based robotic system.
Related papers
- PI-Hunter: Automated Red-Teaming for Exposing and Localizing Prompt Injections [51.8246149916068]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving into agentic systems that interact with external tools and environments.<n>We propose PI-Hunter, an automated agentic auditing framework for proactive vulnerability exposure in LLM agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-10T22:57:02Z) - DecodingTrust-Agent Platform (DTap): A Controllable and Interactive Red-Teaming Platform for AI Agents [121.77550256034]
DecodingTrust-Agent Platform (DTap) is a controllable and interactive red-teaming platform for AI agents.<n>DTap-Red is the first autonomous red-teaming agent that explores diverse injection vectors and autonomously discovers effective attack strategies.<n>Through DTap, we conduct large-scale evaluations of popular AI agents built on various backbone models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-06T11:59:48Z) - Defense Against Indirect Prompt Injection via Tool Result Parsing [5.69701430275527]
LLM agents face an escalating threat from indirect prompt injection.<n>This vulnerability poses a significant risk as agents gain more direct control over physical environments.<n>We propose a novel method that provides LLMs with precise data via tool result parsing while effectively filtering out injected malicious code.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T10:21:56Z) - It's a TRAP! Task-Redirecting Agent Persuasion Benchmark for Web Agents [52.81924177620322]
Web-based agents powered by large language models are increasingly used for tasks such as email management or professional networking.<n>Their reliance on dynamic web content makes them vulnerable to prompt injection attacks: adversarial instructions hidden in interface elements that persuade the agent to divert from its original task.<n>We introduce the Task-Redirecting Agent Persuasion Benchmark (TRAP), an evaluation for studying how persuasion techniques misguide autonomous web agents on realistic tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-29T01:09:10Z) - Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Agent Safety [20.704989548285372]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents can leverage tools like Google Search to complete complex tasks.<n>Current defense strategies rely on fine-tuning LLM agents on datasets of known attacks.<n>We propose Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Agent Safety (ARLAS), a novel framework that leverages adversarial reinforcement learning (RL) by formulating the problem as a two-player zero-sum game.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T23:09:18Z) - Can an Individual Manipulate the Collective Decisions of Multi-Agents? [53.01767232004823]
M-Spoiler is a framework that simulates agent interactions within a multi-agent system to generate adversarial samples.<n>M-Spoiler introduces a stubborn agent that actively aids in optimizing adversarial samples.<n>Our findings confirm the risks posed by the knowledge of an individual agent in multi-agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-20T01:54:20Z) - BlindGuard: Safeguarding LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems under Unknown Attacks [58.959622170433725]
BlindGuard is an unsupervised defense method that learns without requiring any attack-specific labels or prior knowledge of malicious behaviors.<n>We show that BlindGuard effectively detects diverse attack types (i.e., prompt injection, memory poisoning, and tool attack) across multi-agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-11T16:04:47Z) - PeerGuard: Defending Multi-Agent Systems Against Backdoor Attacks Through Mutual Reasoning [8.191214701984162]
Multi-agent systems leverage advanced AI models as autonomous agents that interact, cooperate, or compete to complete complex tasks.<n>Despite their growing importance, safety in multi-agent systems remains largely underexplored.<n>This work investigates backdoor vulnerabilities in multi-agent systems and proposes a defense mechanism based on agent interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T19:08:29Z) - AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents [54.29555239363013]
We propose a generic black-box fuzzing framework, AgentVigil, to automatically discover and exploit indirect prompt injection vulnerabilities.<n>We evaluate AgentVigil on two public benchmarks, AgentDojo and VWA-adv, where it achieves 71% and 70% success rates against agents based on o3-mini and GPT-4o.<n>We apply our attacks in real-world environments, successfully misleading agents to navigate to arbitrary URLs, including malicious sites.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-09T07:40:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.